20 points

I observe what you did there.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

permalink
report
reply
53 points

“Greg, we got an order for a lot of unobserved results. Take the rest of the week off.”

permalink
report
reply
5 points

2060 job posting, Quantum Stability Engineer.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

could a record like this be used as a presence detector? Like if there was any observer who collapsed the wave function then we’d get the collapsed lines in the log, otherwise it would have indicated no observers? (obviously even what the hell is an ‘observer’ anyway?)

permalink
report
reply
9 points

A log is an observance itself. Any measurement changes the state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

How is the unobserved state ever known about, then?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They say, “I’m not peeking” but cross their fingers behind their back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You observe the result, not the experiment while it is running.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It is “guessed” using whatever mathematical model that matches the system.

Of course, if our whole theory is wrong, then the guess will be wrong and we won’t know unless some condition arises where the predicted result and the observed result are different.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

We can observe the end result. E.g. observing the screen only, and you get wavelike behaviour. When you also observe the slit, the wavelike behaviour disappears, and it seems particle like.

Both end in an observation, 1 has an extra observation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes. Trust me, am science guy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Observer here doesn’t mean the same as the layman meaning. It’s anything that interacts with the system while it’s developing.

Interestingly, it actually can be used for a presence detector, at least in a sense. You can use it to transfer cryptographic information. If no-one is listening in, about half your sent numbers are wrong, but you can agree on what ones. However, if someone is listening in, all your data gets randomised.

They actually now use this system to transfer information between banks. They send a random stream of 0s and 1s over a fibre optic cable. They then send (semi publicly) which bits made it properly. If someone spliced into the fibre, they would get the encryption data, but the target bank would not! They know instantly that something is wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes. This is how motion detectors work. Normally, motion detectors have an IR emitter that acts as a particle, but when someone walks by, the IR emitter works as a wave, triggering the motion detector.

Notably, this doesn’t work with dogs, as they have no souls.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Notably, this doesn’t work with dogs, as they have no souls.

Which kind of motion detectors? The ones I know work on everything that’s moving, including my cats (don’t have dogs) or even just throwing something past it

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Oh, you might have one of the newer ones that use interferometry to detect soulless entities.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 8.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.9K

    Posts

  • 98K

    Comments