-6 points
MSN.com - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for MSN.com:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/kamala-harris-tied-with-green-party-candidate-jill-stein-among-muslim-voters-damning-poll-reveals/ar-AA1pJk0C?ocid=BingNewsVerp

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Muslim voters are nevertheless poised to exact revenge on the VP at the ballot box

What a mature read of politics. The US is so fucked. Thinking along these lines Harris will get the final revenge when Trump wins and Israel actually completes the genocide because of it. Genius.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

do you believe democrats en masse…?

I believe democrats en masse are keenly aware of the fact that civilian casualties are an intentional strategy of radical islam to discourage resolve, and unwilling to allow this strategy to remain viable anymore. More importantly, they are far more concerned with the internal consequences of losing to trump than about any foreign policy.

…that she would do so?

No. For one, they are too small and polarizing a minority to make catering to their myopic demands a worthwhile gambit. Her campaign is also smart enough to call the bluff. There is no other option. Vote 3rd party, trump wins. Vote trump, he wins. His winning results in Muslim bans and bulk weapons shipments to Netanyahu with zero hesitation or restrictions.

The time for platform adjusting shenanigans was before the DNC. Is it fair there were no primaries? No. Does that justify being stuck in a mindset that the primaries are still possible? Also no

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Harris and Stein tied at 29%, with 11% of the cohort’s support going to Donald Trump

She’s tied…for first place among Muslim voters. And Trump is getting almost 2/3rds less.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Yeah if anything the story is stein is stomping Trump

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

And yet many Lemmys will just downvote anyway cuz, well, “third party bad.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I feel like you don’t understand what the person you’re responding to is saying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Trump wants to nuke Gaza, pave over the remains and build one of his shitty hotels there. He would also deport Muslims and send those who don’t leave to internment camps. Explain to me how both sides are the same.

permalink
report
reply
-4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Trump’s vile ideas are monstrous, no doubt, but let’s not pretend the Democrats are clean when they continue to fund and support military actions that devastate lives in Gaza and beyond.

Both sides perpetuate violence and oppression in their own ways—whether it’s through blatant aggression or complicit support.

The difference lies in the packaging, not the substance.

It’s my opinion that it really is the same system, two faces, both indifferent to the real suffering they cause.

You disagree, and I respect your right to do that. As I’m sure you respect mine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Who says the Dems are clean? Most leftists I know openly acknowledge she’s so far from perfect but they’d still take her over Trump.

Are you really telling me Trump and Harris are the exact same? Like give me a break. Why is Harris 3x more popular than Trump among Muslim voters?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Who says the Dems are clean?

Not me.

Are you really telling me Trump and Harris are the exact same?

Both sides perpetuate violence and oppression in their own ways—whether it’s through blatant aggression or complicit support.

Why is Harris 3x more popular than Trump among Muslim voters?

Everyone has their own opinions. I support and respect people’s right to have a different opinion than me. Just as you respect and support my right to my own opinions. Yes?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

another winning post from the downvote king.

permalink
report
reply
-20 points
*

another winning post from the downvote king.

So I’ll keep posting. Thanks!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

More like the bad faith actor king. Good job helping Republicans. You can feign ignorance but the proof is in the pudding.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

More like the bad faith actor king. Good job helping Republicans. You can feign ignorance but the proof is in the pudding.

Yeah? If I was helping the Republicans, I’d vote for them. How do you think I’m helping Republicans? On fucking Lemmy which practically worships democrat party or is working extra hard to keep the current broken duopoly in place?

Or wait, is it the almost 200 anti-Republican/pro-socialist posts and comments I’ve made to my c/socialist community? Because Republicans are sooooooooo socialist.

Wait, is it the 16 non-republican Lemmy communities that I’ve started and mod that are also non-republican? Most of which aren’t even political. Because Republicans are sooooooo pro-trans and pro-education.

Wait, is it the over 641 non-republican posts I’ve made? Or is it the 1,000+ anti-republican comments I’ve made arguing with pro-duopoly people such as yourself?

Wait, is it the fact that I actually am a registered socialist and donate money to the socialist parties? Cuz again, Republicans or soooooo socialist.

I’m starting to doubt your good intentions here. You seem pretty anti-democratic in your comments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*

More like the bad faith actor king. Good job helping Republicans. You can feign ignorance but the proof is in the pudding.

Ah, the old accusation of bad faith—a tired tactic used by those who can’t stand to see the working class rise up against the status quo.

You call me the “bad faith actor king,” but I say it’s those who cling to a broken system who are acting in bad faith.

I’m not here to play by the rules set by the very forces that oppress us; I’m here to shatter those chains and expose the truth.

If standing up for workers’ rights and challenging the duopoly makes me a threat to your cozy alliance with the establishment, then I wear your insults like armor.

The proof isn’t in the pudding, my friend—it’s in the political revolution that’s building momentum. It might not happen this election or the next, but rest assured, people are growing weary of the duopoly. We won’t be bullied into submission, and we won’t stop fighting for true change.

And we’re not voting for your candidate. Or for the republicans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

another winning post from the downvote king.

If speaking truth to power and challenging the status quo makes me the “downvote king,” then I gladly accept the crown.

Brothers and sisters who fear the kind of bullying I face, wear your downvotes like a badge of honor, just as I do. Every downvote is a sign that the capitalist defenders are feeling the pressure of our righteous cause—and that, my friends, is how you know we’re on the right path.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Pra ba Jeeba

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments