59 points

The civilian settlers who are taking Palestinian homes by force are an occupying force.

The attack by Hamas was not legitimate because it was against random civilians.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

I agree entirely. But to them, Israelis are all ‘settlers’.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m not saying Israelis are guilty or deserved the attack on civilians, but Israel is a settler-colonial state. So is the US, but I’m not going to call for every US citizen with colonial roots to be forced off the continent (especially since that would include myself, my ancestors - including recent ones - were awful people who did awful things).

You can acknowledge that the state of Israel is an illegal settlement without calling for genocide, just as you can acknowledge that the US is founded on stolen land without calling for death to all Americans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

My point was that they regard all Israelis as culpable in the same manner as those currently constructing illegal settlements in the West Bank and shooting Palestinians, and use such terminology as a means of justifying their view of collective guilt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Palestine is also a settler-colonial state, and so are the Ottomans. So is pretty much every sovereign nation in the world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

So, let me just confirm - you regard Israeli civilians as not innocent for the crime of being born Israeli on stolen land. Correct?

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

This is their name for the attack by Hamas on a music festival, is that right?

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Yep.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-31 points

I just woke up this morning to the news that six hostages had been found dead in a tunnel in Gaza, cause of death multiple gunshot wounds at close range.

I struggle to find sympathy for Palestine after reading a story like that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Hamas deserve no sympathy - but most Palestinians are just people, like the Israelis, living under a regime that heavily peddles dehumanizing propaganda. If we had no sympathy for the Israelis because of the Palestinians intentionally killed by their hands, we’d be going down the same route that’s currently locking the two sides into a fucking pointless race towards genocide, that Israel seems likely to ‘win’.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

All of Palestine? You gotta refine that opinion dude, it’s ~5 million people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Should foreigners lose sympathy for your people as a whole, if a group whose members hailed from it do something horrible? Its not like everyday people in Palestine have much choice about what goes on there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

What does killing 40 thousand people, mostly innocent, do for your sympathies? Raping and torturing people in detention. For that matter, detention without charge? Turning off water to 2 million people? Preventing food and medical aid? No, sorry - the IDF claimed that a bad thing was done by Hamas… more genocide is clearly called for. You’re allowed to think whatever you like online, as you’ve asserted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Palestine didn’t kill those hostages, Hamas did. Hamas deserves to die, innocents do not, and killing innocents to reach the bad guy is not justified

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

I too find it hard to sympathize with little Hind or the poet Refaat when they murder hostages.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Based

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Daily reminder that tankies aren’t leftists.

permalink
report
reply
9 points
*

stolen your homes and land

private property should be abolished

Pick only one

permalink
report
reply
4 points

That’s not what they mean by “private property.” Leftists are just so goddamn stubborn that they refuse to acknowledge the immediate confusion and use any other label.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Is there anything resembling a consensus on that? They’re not interested in our toothbrushes as they say, but how about arable land? A machine shop? A work truck?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Depends what you’re using it for

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

When they say “private property” they are not referring to the people’s toothbrush, but the private ownership of production. Houses and such are “personal property”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They are also private property. How about my machine shop? My acre of land with a garden? A dairy cow?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

That depends on the use. Are you using it as a productive business for profit or just something you like, maybe even for some side money. Are you hiring employees to work it for you? Once you make it a mode of production it’s considered a privately owned means of production. If it’s something you just have, it’s personal property.

That’s the gist anyway. These are actual, defined terms and not just things people throw around on the internet. If you want something more specific, doing a search will probably get a better explanation than I’m good at giving.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Holy strawman, Batman!

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Please explain to me how defining the murder of civilians as a legitimate and legal attack for the crime of existing in a country while a particular ethnicity is anything but a call for ethnic cleansing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Characterising fighting against an occupying force as “calling for the genocide of the working class for being the wrong ethnicity” is deliberately misinterpreting the post that (I presume you) were responding to.

That is a strawman.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

“[attack targeting civilians] was a legitimate attack against an occupying force.”

“Innocent civilians are not an occupying force”

“When they’re the people who’ve stolen your homes and land, they are”

Please, explain this to me. Explain to me how “Israeli civilians are legitimate targets because they’re the ethnicity who’ve stolen your homes and land” isn’t a call for genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply

MeanwhileOnGrad

!meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works

Create post

“Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he’s on the floor!”

Welcome to MoG!

Meanwhile On Grad

Documenting hate-speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse


What is a Tankie?

Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of bias)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don’t be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism or any variation of Tankie Ideology. There is no justifying Genocide.

Revisionism — Downplaying or denying atrocities past and present will result in an immediate ban.

If you’re violating instance rules, you’ll typically be warned. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last seven days, but repeat infractions will have longer sentences. You may ask to be unbanned.


Community stats

  • 1.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 195

    Posts

  • 2.5K

    Comments