Is this the fastest video game death of all time? Not even Lawbreakers died this fast.

40 points

All 15 of them

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Being a little generous there, bud

permalink
report
parent
reply
178 points

Every game executive and investor wants a Fortnight. That’s why no matter how many times gamers reject it live service games will continue to be developed. Because AAA games are made for investors not players.

permalink
report
reply
87 points

When God of War was popular, they wanted a God of War of their own.

When Call of Duty was popular, they wanted a Call of Duty of their own.

When Overwatch was popular, they wanted a Overwatch of their own.

When Fortnite was popular, everyone wants their own Fortnite.

Rinse and repeat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s not like any game is completely original anyways. They all take inspiration from games that come before, some more than others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

While that is true, the issue is that they are trend chasing for a quick cash grab and put in next to no effort to make the game good or listen to consumers saying that this isn’t what we want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think the shareholder takeover of gaming removed one big thing from the tendency to “take inspiration” from competitors, and that is developing the world and characters in order to make the clone feel unique and deep.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

I wonder what all the big publishers are pushing now. A Genshin? A Palworld?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

actually yes, there have been alot of games in the rpgmmo ish game like genshin and the ark / survival builder games like Palworld.

Whenever a game becomes popular people and studios try to make thier own. Palworld is an example of one that worked (it being Ark survival evolved: pokemon editon)

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

expect a push of gacha games, gacha games will be considered potential money printing machines by higher executives

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Genshin-likes are being very popular in the east, this year we got Wuthering Waves (which is actually much better), and 2-3 years ago we got Tower of Fantasy (which was terrible), now the same studio from ToF announced Neverness to Everness which is the same concept of an open world anime action rpg but in an urban setting, suspiciously years after Project Mugen had been announced which is has the exact same premise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Oppai Succubus Academy exists. So where the fuck are all of my Oppai Succubus Academy clones?

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

They’re all on F95.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I mean sometimes it works. Pubg was the big Battle Royale in town until Fortnite came along. League of Legends too. The problem with Concord is it took about 6 years to come out so it couldn’t draft on the hot trend.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

League of Legends is a pet peeve of mine, since one bad person took down DotA forum, stole ideas from it, created LoL, and acted like a big shot. He wasn’t alone, but you know what I mean.

To this day I think that Blizzard hates esports, because they left DotA with 0 support, and only after many years of Dota 2 they created Heroes of the Storm, which was even more watered down than LoL.

And LoL is such a simple game, which is OK, but once you actually understand Dota, it doesn’t come anywhere close. It brought nothing innovative. Which is sad.

Source: I played hundreds of hours, and put hundreds of dollars into LoL back in the ~2010.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

It’s not like gamers are rejecting live services as a whole, because there are still quite a lot of successful live service games. And when a live service is successful, it’s really successful. So much so that it’s worth it to investors to keep gambling on them, one hit can compensate for a dozen flops.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Can they stay solvent through a dozen flops when each one costs them hundreds of millions of dollars?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Usually they don’t completely flop though, they just underwhelm expectations but if they can stay active long enough with the right amount of whales and fish they can usually break even or make a small profit. Concord is just a high profile legitimate flop that was turned off before it could do anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This is the truth people don’t want to admit, but Final Fantasy XIV being successful carried square enix through their darkest days when everything wasn’t making a profit. Cygames using all the money they got from the granblue gacha to finance an action rpg and a fighting game, etc.

They serve as a safety net, we lost mimimi last year, I don’t think anyone would say they made bad games, but they just didn’t sell enough so they closed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Problem with trying to get a Fortnite was that Epic was wanting to get it’s own PUBG after realizing that trying to get their own Minecraft was a failed endeavor. They quickly pivoted the game formula from a Minecraft type tower defense to a battle royale game.

Concord should have seen the writing on the wall early on and pivoted it’s game into something else thats flavor of the month.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Wait wasn’t the original concept for fortnite actually a wave based tower defence game? I remember being excited for that and then battle royal happened and I lost all interest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Yeah, the original trailer made it clear they were trying to go after the Minecraft style of gathering resources, building up a base and fortifying it, then defending from zombie mobs at night, like the Minecraft mobs.

Maybe not so much the pixel/block graphics, but the ideas behind Minecraft, with an actual objective, which Minecraft lacked.

https://youtu.be/hHTE5xg9E-g

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

People paid for that original game too, it wasn’t free. I don’t assume they got refunded. It was basically a massive bait and switch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah the tower defense part of it was actually quite fun

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

You just made me realise I’m a gamer, not a Fortniter. But I probably should’ve realised that based on my Steam "years of service* and disgustingly large catalogue.

I’m a proven guaranteed money pot, publishers! Make me something good and I give the moneys!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The challenge is that requires creativity. Creativity isn’t a stable investment.

Viva La indie game studio!

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Lawbreakers was an excellent game that was killed by executive stupidity.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I thought it was killed by having stupid design around game objectives and not letting you tweak those rules yourself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Don’t forget the fact that is was a free-to-play game with a $30 price-tag.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That’s what killed it for me. I really enjoyed the Lawbreakers beta, but paying $30 for a game that would either die at a fixed price or quickly shift to F2P made no sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How does a f2p game cost $30?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Honestly. I kinda would have liked to try concord, but I sure as shit wasn’t going to pay to try it.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

The game had an open beta and only 2 thousand people played it, no one cared.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

So funny when a corpo is forced to seem positive about something where there is absolutely no positive way of spinning it. It has this surreal energy where the person doing PR seems almost uncanny, like some kind of lizard person.

permalink
report
reply

Games

!games@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

Community stats

  • 9.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.7K

    Posts

  • 79K

    Comments