The threats, which already closed government offices and caused school evacuations, come as Trump pushes racist lie

202 points

So terrorism…

permalink
report
reply
63 points

No, no, no, no, it’s only terrorism if the perpetrators are brown. If they’re white republicans it’s just a little prankarooni!

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

*sparkling directed violence

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

If they’re white republicans it’s just a little prankarooni! they’re called freedom™️ fighters!

This is unironically what most of them believe they are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Bruh, prankaroon is not the preferred nomenclature.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

So terrorism…

Yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Violence or the threat of violence by non state actors. Yup, fits perfectly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
160 points
*

They wear their title proudly. Openly admit it in the streets.

And yet for some reason, are allowed to continue to operate freely.

Our country goes to war for less.

Edit: A friend of mine got this shoved in their mailbox today

Totally not domestic terrorists…

permalink
report
reply
36 points

Our country goes to war for less.

Against brown people.

When was the last time the US bombed a white country?

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Yugoslavia 1999

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Weirdly enough, it was also to help save Muslim people. White Muslims, but still.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If you’ll forgive me for taking an opportunity to rant a bit, I once saw a hexbear saying Bernie was terrible because he voted to “carpet bomb” Yugoslavia. Besides the fact that carpet bombing by air isn’t how things work anymore, this is one of the least objectionable things the US military has done post-cold war.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Can you provide a list of “white countries”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

“beasts of the field”… What is this? Reads like some Klan shit.

A few sentences later. Oh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Jesus, is this real??

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

I don’t see anything in that link confirming that this is real. It talks about a thing from 2 years ago.

I mean, if you’re just trying to say they’re proud pieces of shit, that’s known. But not what they asked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Besides checking these address and phone number (did anyone check them?), the printer that produced these may be IDed if it leaves special secret marks:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

What for? It’s not illegal to distribute flyers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If they were shoved in the mailbox without postage it’s definitely illegal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Fot more information

🤦

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I saw Hasan Piker share that KKK flyer yesterday on his stream. It’s fucking disgusting, with the font and everything.

I was apprehensive about using the term Nazi to describe conservatives because I didn’t want to group them all under that banner, but there’s no hiding it anymore. I’m going to use this language around my friends and family until and after the election in hopes of setting there minds straight. We are literally watching the coming of the Fourth Reich. Fuck

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

10 years ago, this would have looked like something out of a dystopian movie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Wow… that font choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If it was in their mailbox and had no postage, report it to your post office. That’s illegal and the postmaster can hit them up for postage due.

permalink
report
parent
reply
87 points

I doubt it will happen, but it would be poetic justice if so many people get pissed over this that Trump loses Ohio.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Current model from Silver and the polls raw data averages say it’s not even close. Trump will win the state by a 97.6% to 2.4% spread.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Doubt

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

It’s not the spread. It’s the likelihood of him winning the state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

If it starts to make his numbers dip it could trigger them to divert more money to Ohio it hadn’t previously meant to. Could have a broader effect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

In the latest version I found of Nate Silver’s model (not 538), he has Ohio coming in at 52.4% for Trump and 43.6% for Harris, an 8.8% spread. I did not dig deeper to find the dates or particular polls from Ohio he’s basing that on.

However, based on these numbers, he is likely modelling that Trump wins Ohio in 90%+ of outcomes to Harris’s <5% of outcomes.

This is the same way he spoke to his model in previous elections. It wasn’t that Hillary was expected to win 80-90% of the popular vote or electoral college just weeks before the 2016 election, it was that his model had her winning that percentage of the outcomes when he ran the model.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

The numbers I gave are the model outputs for the state as of yesterday off his subscriber based model talk page.

So no.

Of course these are the likelihood of a win and not polling differences. That’s why I said model output, not a poll aggregate.

An 8 point spread in a state for polling averages is incredibly large. For reference Ohio is as deeply spread red in polling averages as Nee Jersey is blue. You think New Jersey votes red this year in any reasonable reality? No.

For an even more crazy but accurate comparison: Alaska has the same mid point statistical odds of going red as Ohio, but its error bars are more than double Ohio. Meaning? There is an incredibly slim but massively more possible chance Alaska goes blue than Ohio.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

People are going to mistake those odds for polling numbers…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They very much did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

“… so you’re saying there’s a chance? …”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Unfortunately that’s not usually the first impact of terrorism. Support for them will rise until they do something stupid, pointless, and tragic. Unfortunately by that time there’s thousands of people deep in the ideology in an area and it requires military action to clean up. Telling that something is wrong and we’re all hurting brings people in. Killing innocent people drives people away. It’s why David Duke is all rhetoric and little action. He can publicly sever himself and the movement from people who do take action while influencing them to do so and advancing his political position.

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

He needs to be held responsible, but no one has the balls to do it. This is how he’s been allowed to get where he is.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

He will not be held accountable. See 2021-01-06

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points
*

The US has always had domestic terrorism sure, but you can’t tell me we didn’t legitimately become a straight up terror state once Trump stochastically sent his goons to do his bidding. Courts are citing the pressure these people are causing in their rulings and handlings of Trump, which means the terrorism is working to alter the rule of law. Since the US law system is based heavily on precedent, there’s a good chance this alteration of the law will extend beyond just for Trump. All it takes is the right (or wrong depending on your perspective) judge and enough money for a damn good lawyer.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Insert Reagan “we don’t negotiate with terrorists” while negotiating with terrorists

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

By negotiate, you mean work hand in hand with them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

He was also wrong even in general. Negotiators are trained specifically because you do negotiate with terrorists. Not to give into their big demands, of course, but to try to end the situation with minimal bloodshed, especially to hostages and bystanders.

“We agree to pull back the perimeter by 15 feet. As a gesture of good faith, could you release three of the hostages? You’ll still have five more.” Or “Let’s do the exchange this way” which will just so happen to perfectly line up all the terrorists to give snipers a clear shot. That sort of thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Malcolm X had many supporters. He was held responsible when just a handful of them committed ‘terrorist’ acts.

Malcolm wasn’t innocent in that respect, but far more so than Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 446K

    Comments