3 points

Two thirds of a pint please, so that’s two thirds of the cost of a pint yeah? So cheaper right? Right???

permalink
report
reply
2 points

They don’t sound like much fun!

permalink
report
reply
37 points

Well that’s illegal, and I can literally point to the letter of the law:

Some goods must be sold in fixed sizes known as ‘specified quantities’.

Draught beer and cider: Third, half, two-thirds of a pint and multiples of half a pint

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

They were serving 2/3, so it’s fully legal. Also they’re actually urging the govt to reduce sizes, not the pub owners directly.

Granted, it would be nice if we had had more than a screenshot to go off on

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Surely a fine publication such as the Mirror wouldn’t publish a misleading headline?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Oh come on now, next you’re going to tell me Daily Star is not a shining beacon of journalistic integrity!

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The Code is more what you’d call “guidelines” than actual rules.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Seems like the part where it says it can be sold in half pints means that it would be ok to sell a half a pint.

I think maybe your comment didnt do a great job of expressing your point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

We don’t have a link to the article so we don’t know exactly what they’re doing, but I feel it’s unlikely that they’ve just replaced pints with half pints. Or maybe they have, that would be even weirder!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I do hope this isn’t a road to the term ‘pint’ just becoming a generic name rather than actually holding meaning. I remember when a 99 referred to the price!

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

The british pound once referred to the value of a “pound” of silver at the time. Though the meaning of even that measurement of weight has likely changed

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

A very good point, I’m just bitter about the cost of a 99!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The number 99 meant royalty in Belgium, where flakes came from. Nothing to do with price

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Did not know that, very interesting! Wonder if there’s something similar for the UK.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Lion and Unicorn? Probably? The actual crown itself has a fancy form of copyright on it where you cannot really use it on anything except for historical stuff or tacky memorabilia celebrating the likes of a coronation, jubilee, birth, death, etc

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

slashing the size of pints boost sales in an unexpected way

Oh is it unexpected is it? Unexpected that selling people less quantity per unit would increase sales as people would probably still want the same quantity?

This is weirdly pro business from the mirror

permalink
report
reply
21 points

The unexpected way is that while it decreased sales of beer it increased sales of wine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

So the people who didn’t like the idea of short pints asked if they were messing with the serving size of wine, and when told no, they went with that. Everyone else just consumed the same amount as they would’ve, more or less.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Probably as they were charging the same price as a pint, perhaps an exaggerating, but I suspect two halves wouldn’t be the same price as a pint was last week. Nobody likes to be ripped off.

permalink
report
parent
reply

okmatewanker

!okmatewanker@feddit.uk

Create post

No foul language - i.e. French 🤮

Obviously satire, dozy wankers

Community stats

  • 1.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 174

    Posts

  • 1.9K

    Comments