Disclaimer: this is purposefully obtuse.

Other effects in the game which explicitly state they kill you:

Shadows, succubi, massive damage, death saving throws, beholder death ray (notably not even their disintegration ray kills you), power word kill, vampires, mind flayers, night hags, drow inquisitors.

Clearly, if they intended for disintegration to kill you, they’d have said so. Since specific overrides general, and there is no general rule that disintegrated creatures are dead, I rest my case. QED.

138 points

OP you appear to be committed to (not) dying on this hill and I applaud you

permalink
report
reply
83 points

I like it RAW and wriggling!

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

What’s sneezing precious

permalink
report
parent
reply
136 points

Ain’t nothin’ in the RAW that states a sentient pile of dust can’t play basketball.

permalink
report
reply
49 points

All new straight-to-DVD film, “Air coughing fit

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Dustbud ®

permalink
report
parent
reply
87 points

A disintegrated creature and everything it is wearing and carrying, except magic items, are reduced to a pile of fine gray dust. The creature can be restored to life only by means of a true resurrection or a wish spell.

Why would you need to be “restored to life” if you weren’t dead?

permalink
report
reply
90 points

Because you could later die. So a creature that has been disintegrated, and then later dies, can only be brought back by those means.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

If this was the intent of the rules, it would be expressed in explicit, unambiguous language. They don’t write contingency rules for possible future events that haven’t happened this way, and if you interpret rules documents this way, then everything becomes an argument.

The implication of “the creature can only be restored to life by (x)…” is present tense. It applies to the current state of the game following the events described. The language “unattended objects catch fire” in fireball doesn’t mean “unattended objects in the area of a fireball will catch fire if someone sets fire to them.” it means they catch fire.

Language in rules doesn’t ambiguously cater to a potential future state of the game that may not occur. It is describing the current state of the game, like the rules do in all other situations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

To the contrary, if it were intended to kill you it would be explicit. See all the examples I included in the OP.

The “present tense” argument doesn’t hold water when you look at how spells are worded. Let’s take a look at Alarm:

You set an alarm against intrusion…

Present tense. It describes a state change to the game world.

…Until the spell ends,…

Describes an ending to that state. We can conclude that the alarm state lasts until the spell ends.

Disintegration does not describe any such end to the changed state. We can conclude that this rider effect comes into play if the character ever dies in the future.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

You’re misreading the language. It is present-tense, not future.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

I’m not misreading anything. “The creature can only…” applies a new state to the creature. After that state has been applied, or somehow reversed (unaware of any way to do this by RAW), then the creature can only be brought back to life by the means mentioned in the spell.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I’m sorry, I don’t know enough about the English language to recognise the difference. What would the phrase be in future tense?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I thought you needed a body part to resurrect? I might be thinking Pathfinder, though cause I mostly play that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The dust is your body, just in a different shape

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

But… how do you kill that which has no life?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s DND, usually a good thwacking or else some holy damage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You sell it contaminated e-girl bath water

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Undeath?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The difficulty of restoring to life someone who is already alive is why such high-level magic is required.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

o7

permalink
report
parent
reply

My sister played a campaign as a sentient ham sandwich. She would love this.

Edit:

Lmao 🤣

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Haha awesome, glad she enjoyed it!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

I’ve never played DND so I don’t know if this is something you could pull off or anything but I’d probably be like

“I snort the fine pile of dust” and then, I don’t know, there’s some latent personality or intention there, so now we have to alternate playing my character between turns/minutes or something. It’d probably make for some great RP moments, especially if each personality couldn’t remember very well what the other was doing previously. Maybe the class and abilities change with each person, which makes arming up appropriately interesting or a pain depending on how we handle it I suppose.

permalink
report
parent
reply

That would definitely fit right in at our table. Half the group is trying to break the game with their build, and the other half is trying to one-up the first half.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’d say ingesting the powder either kills it (had the players managed to get me to agree it was alive) or sends it on a tour of your digestive tract

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

I see no flaw in this argument. Instead of dying, the character exists like the guy from “One” by Metallica, desperately waiting for a stiff breeze to end his existence.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

Dust pan, imprisoning me, all I can be, a pile of fine dust

I cannot live, I cannot die, turned into dust, scattered across the floor

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Hold your breath, so you don’t blow me

Away dude—I’m dust

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

All we are is dust in the wind, dude

permalink
report
parent
reply

RPGMemes

!rpgmemes@ttrpg.network

Create post

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

Community stats

  • 2.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 21K

    Comments