50 points

What a silly hill to die on. This is blatantly unconstitutional. That’s obvious to everyone, even those of us who might agree in spirit. So it’s just a waste. A waste of time and tax payer money. New Mexico is gonna spend time and resources on this that could be better spent elsewhere.

What’s more it wastes political capital. Capital that is gonna be needed soon for the Democratic party. So I can’t fathom why she’s doing this. She just gave conservatives the high ground and a huge rallying call.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

With the current court, it is unconstitutional. Several states banned public carry when the country was founded including Virginia so it’s not like that was unheard of at the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

100% this. It feels like sabotage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Show me where the constitution gives you a right to open carry.

Oh that’s right, it doesn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I love how effectively controversial things like this function like bug traps in drawing out the gnats - makes it easy to identify the low-effort trolls for a quick block.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

A judge has already issued a temporary order to block the ban.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Thank goodness, the murders can continue

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

I know right, this governor should have made murder illegal instead touches forhead

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t think it’s quite an equivalence. When carrying firearms is illegal (as it effectively is in my country of Canada), you know whenever you see someone with a gun that you should run and call the police. You know they’re up to no good. In many US states, if you see someone with a gun… you kinda just have to deal with it. Maybe they’ll shoot you. Maybe they just need to overcompensate for something. You can’t really run from it because it can be so common.

A decent amount of gun crime is also spur of the moment acts. They won’t go home, get their gun, and come back. The gun violence only happens because the perpetrator happened to have a gun when they were angry. Banning carrying doesn’t guarantee people won’t be armed in public, but it sure will heavily reduce it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yep. Waiting until after murders occur is definitely the right approach to curbing gun violence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

For a second there I worried my children could die without firearms!

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Open or concealed carry is insane. You Americans are unhinged.

This is from a gun owner.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Believing a politician can unilaterally suspend a right protected by both the federal and state constitution is unhinged.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I wasn’t commenting on that, I was commenting on carrying a gun in public

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Licensed concealed carriers have a lower violent crime rate than the general public. So its unhinged to ban these individuals from carrying thinking it’ll stop criminals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Good thing open carry isn’t protected then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I think the last time we cared about another country’s opinion of how we live our lives was in 1775.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

We’d definitely be better off if we actually care about how countries that are objectively better in multiple metrics do things differently.

Like oh I don’t know, Healthcare. Plus the overwhelming amount of gun violence that doesn’t exist in any other country than our own, the other ones are probably on to something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They do tend to do the whole social safety net thing far better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

my God do you realise how cringe this statement is

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Well, how the people who haven’t been shot yet live their lives at least.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

I wish I could give you a gold award.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Hah, a classic!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

“This from a gun owner” is my favorite take on the “how do you do, fellow kids” meme.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well I own 5 guns and would never even consider carrying in public ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Nifty. Neither being a firearm owner nor count of firearms in any way invalidates the decisions of those who choose to do so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

From what I saw, even the Democrat AG of New Mexico won’t support or defend this in court.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Yeah, she’s also lost the support of many of her party members.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Goddam…we love our guns, though.

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 22K

    Posts

  • 552K

    Comments