Hunter Biden’s lawyer filed an ethics complaint in the House of Representatives on Friday against Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene for reaching a “new level of abhorrent behavior” after she displayed sexually explicit pictures of him during a hearing Wednesday.

309 points

Now file charges under DC revenge porn law

permalink
report
reply
70 points

Then emailed it to non age verified people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

So, she should be on the sexual offenders list?

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

Unfortunately she’s protected by congressional immunity. If only people in power didn’t create special rules for themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
98 points

Only when she says it on the floor as a congresswoman. She doesn’t have carte blanche to say whatever she wants anywhere else.

And since she sent out his nudes in a mailer, he can sue

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

I’m not sure she had immunity here. Did she have a lawful right to obtain those pictures or to release them in a public hearing? Probably not.

Further, I’m pretty certain this didn’t fall under legitimate legislative purposes.

She may be personally interest in hunter’s giant cock, but it’s difficult to imagine a legitimate governmental interest- especially since he’s a private citizen not employed by the government. Him doing a porn shoot or having a dick are irrelevant to an irs investigation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Unfortunately, she does have carte blanche, implicitly, when nobody has the guts to stand up for justice and charge her for the crime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

What does congressional immunity specify about guillotines?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They are discouraged. Rather too humane.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

How else would we see the presidents sons penis? This is America! It used to be tradition to show your tax return. Now they will just show their sons penises.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I’ve been thinking this is exactly the way to go.

permalink
report
parent
reply
199 points

This needs to be more than an ethics complaint. This was revenge porn.

permalink
report
reply
-11 points

Hubter doing porn and getting out… Doing drugs from the crack of a prostitute that he paied with your money… Hahahh

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I’m pretty sure I don’t own Burisma, so it wouldn’t be my money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
123 points

It’s wild how unhinged our society has become in such a short time

permalink
report
reply
103 points

not everybody. just one, particular sector of society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I believe a wise woman once aptly described them as “deplorables.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

it’s just going to exponentiate from here. we’ve only been on the curve of the hockey stick so far. about to be vertical

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah. We are not in a good place to deal with AI propaganda and the consequences of climate change.

We let pond scum take too much power and wealth because none of us wanted to become politicans, union leaders and protest organisers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is why if you want to maintain security, you can’t have exposed hinges. Well there’s ways Around the problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s how she goes. Things get worse bit by bit, then all at once

It’s how systems fail

permalink
report
parent
reply
109 points

Again. What the fuck does Hunter Biden matter, and why is this Scarecrow looking scab insist on wasting our money on this garbage?

permalink
report
reply
52 points

hunter biden matters to republicans because he’s the only thing they can hang on joe biden, who has been honestly masterful in the way he’s navigated the late and post-pandemic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

I honestly don’t understand why they act like Joe Biden is the only politician with a child who has addiction issues and/or failed relationships. Donald Trump Jr. is also divorced and has had alcohol addiction problems. During the Biden/Trump debates I almost wanted Biden to mention Don Jr’s problems since Don Sr kept bringing up Hunter, but fortunately familial attacks are beneath Biden.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

If they cared about what close relatives of presidents were doing, they should be investigating Jared’s deal with the Saudis.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I honestly don’t understand

you’re still assuming good faith. stop it. they’re not interested in developing a well-rounded worldview and a rational approach to solving the problems that face America. They’re interested in seizing as much power as possible and hurting their opponents as much as possible. Once you realize that, their actions start to make perfect sense. Acting like Joe Biden is the only politician with a problem child serves that end. Ignoring Don Jr’s obvious coke and booze habit serves that end. There is no guiding philosophy to them, no principles they serve, no basis of human decency in which they even pretend to embed themselves. They’ve gone full Lee Atwater: they know who they’re enemies are and they’ll hurt everyone as long as their enemies get hurt too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-25 points

What? No that’s not it. They highlight this because when liberals all respond saying they don’t care about this they help reinforce to republicans that they shouldn’t care about Trump’s prostitution stuff or “grab em by the pussy”. It makes liberals look like people doing a performance who don’t actually hold those things as principles because they’re entirely willing to toss them aside for certain issues.

I don’t have a dog in this race because I’m not american.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I’m not American either but my wife is so I know more about this than I would like. Like Hunter Biden is not in government and all he has done is smoke crack, have sex with prostitutes, swindle money from corpos by saying who his dad is and have a massive shlong so I don’t see the connection.

Like american politicians in general come off to me as the most insincere people in the whole world. Like half of them probably do cocaine regularly, quite a few are obvious child molesters, pretty much all of them abuse their position just to fill their wallet with platant insider trading and the rest are owned by major corporations. No one there needs help to seem like it’s just a performance. Like the only thing in American politics that seems sincere is republicans hating minorities, they are just making that their central focus even if it’s not popular.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

We’re not really saying “we don’t care.” What we’re saying is: Hunter Biden isn’t on the ballot. There’s no evidence that Joe Biden did anything illegal so this isn’t changing our voting plans. If Hunter did something illegal, he should get an appropriate punishment for it, but this should also apply to Don Jr, Ivanka, and everyone else.

Instead, Republicans want to “get” Hunter Biden on something - anything - and tie Joe Biden to that by virtue of being Hunter’s father. However, they also don’t want anything Trump’s kids do to be tied to Trump. It’s an obvious double standard employed for political gain without any regard for the truth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

It’s not Trump vs. Hunter Biden, but Trump vs. Joe Biden, so this sounds like the typical brainworm-reasoning that you get from right-wingers.

Donald Trump himself is the one doing the bad stuff, Biden‘s son‘s actions can’t be pinned on his father. Especially so because Hunter is not in in the government, unlike the monsters that are Trump‘s spawn.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I don’t have a dog in this race because I’m not american.

Ok Boris.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

oh you’re right in that this serves an overall strategy they call “flooding the zone”, which is where you try to make your actual hideousness seem equivalent to your opponents in order to encourage people to just check out of politics. In 2016 one of Trump’s key campaign strategies was getting Clinton voters to stay home on the idea that “they’re all the same anyway, what does it matter?” But the fact is liberals do care, and they want to see justice done. Hunter Biden has been charged with federal crimes and plead guilty, and there’s no liberal backlash because he did that shit. They tried this with the Epstein plane too. They were like “But Bill Clinton was on the plane too” and most people’s reaction was “he can have the cell next to Trump’s”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

Yea… Who cares of all the money he took? Fucking crack head good for nothing… Doing coce at the white house… My God

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You need to take another esl class.

Or go back for your GED. Whichever. Fucking moron.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Fucking retard

permalink
report
parent
reply
-115 points

Because he’s sneaking cocaine into the White house?

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Y’all been calling his dad sleepy for years he had to help wake him up somehow

permalink
report
parent
reply
-30 points

Well if you put it that way, how am I supposed to argue against that. 😆

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

A more plausible explanation is that a visitor on a tour brought it and left it there, and Occam’s Razor says that the simplest explanation is most likely the correct one.

But that doesn’t feed your insane narrative about Biden Crime Family, so I can see why you’d rather live in a fantasy world where you feel vindicated for having bad opinions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

It’s more plausible that some random someone on a tour left their cocaine in a place they weren’t returning to rather than someone with regular access left their stash for later.

Ok, I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

Doesn’t take a genius to piece the two together.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Is he smuggling the drugs in his penis? Or

permalink
report
parent
reply
-44 points

Ask the FBI maybe they can tell you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Source?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Just trust 'em.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-63 points

Some things don’t need a source. TM.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Sneaking it in and hiding it in a visitors’ belongings section! That’s definitely plausible!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Plausible deniability!

Nah I’m just kidding, but that would be a good place to hide it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

prove your allegation, troll

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Ok, Boris.

permalink
report
parent
reply
91 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
27 points

Yes, that’s very cut and dry. She broke that law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Maybe he did consent. Maybe they are kinky in their own ways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Isn’t going to happen. People in power, especially Republicans, don’t get in trouble for anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-123 points

Except he very much did consent to disclosure by turning a drive and it’s content over to someone else

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points

That’s not how it works. It’s explicitly NOT how that works. That’s the entire reason revenge porn laws exist.

What you are claiming, would be equivalent to sending a nude to someone and then them posting it online and because you consented in the first to send it to them they’re okay to repost it. That’s literally revenge porn.

You numpty.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Dummy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

How the data was obtained is irrelevant to it being illegal to distribute it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 449K

    Comments