Hunter Biden’s lawyer filed an ethics complaint in the House of Representatives on Friday against Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene for reaching a “new level of abhorrent behavior” after she displayed sexually explicit pictures of him during a hearing Wednesday.

-80 points

These pictures… were in the publics interest… to see

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Just wanted you to know, I knew you were being sarcastic, but I only have one upvote to normalize the situation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Haha, that’s okay

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

We would like to see yours. For public interest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-25 points

I am lacking in crack cocaine and high class escorts so I can’t produce any sadly

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Oh really? Please elaborate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

What possible reason would the public need to see Hunter Biden naked? What relevance does it have to anything?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

I was being sarcastic

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

We need to normalize /s again

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

…and that’s how you learn about Poe’s Law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

The NSA sees me naked all the time

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They’re going to continue to erode any remaining 4th amendment protections so why should the presidents son have any privacy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points
*

One side uses a distraction. It gets full media attention. People get involved. People get angry. People start blaming each other. Then, the other side counters with a distraction. It gets even more heated. This time it’s personal. There might even be consequences. Maybe…

Why the fuck are you eating all this rotting shit those out of touch, self-absorbed, greedy, attention-seeking Partisans are serving you?

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Because they’re the people that craft our laws? Why shouldn’t we care?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points
*

Yea, naked pictures of a politicant are vital to your legal wellbeing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

And that’s how you took that comment?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

While she ought to be tossed in jail, she is likely shielded by the Speech & Debate clause.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Taking a private citizens’s nudes and sharing it against their will in congress may go against the spirit of that clause. I would love to see how this holds up in court.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-47 points

Except he voluntary turned over the laptop with the photos.

permalink
report
parent
reply

If you give your employer your bank info for direct deposit does that give them the right to drain your bank account?

No?

Because that wasn’t the reason you gave them the information?

Huh. So the reason you disclose something is relevant to how it is used? Go figure. 🤷

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

So if I turn my laptop in to a repair shop, which is what he did, they have the right to publish anything they find on it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

For what she did on the floor of Congress, yes.

But she also emailed it out to her supporters. That ain’t “speech or debate in either House”

permalink
report
parent
reply
87 points

Complaint. What she did was a not legal in Washington dc.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

If only there were limits on the speech and debate clause…

permalink
report
parent
reply
123 points

It’s wild how unhinged our society has become in such a short time

permalink
report
reply
2 points

This is why if you want to maintain security, you can’t have exposed hinges. Well there’s ways Around the problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
103 points

not everybody. just one, particular sector of society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I believe a wise woman once aptly described them as “deplorables.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

it’s just going to exponentiate from here. we’ve only been on the curve of the hockey stick so far. about to be vertical

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah. We are not in a good place to deal with AI propaganda and the consequences of climate change.

We let pond scum take too much power and wealth because none of us wanted to become politicans, union leaders and protest organisers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s how she goes. Things get worse bit by bit, then all at once

It’s how systems fail

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 453K

    Comments