120 points

Good on the host for insisting on getting the guy’s face fully on camera. That’s some quick thinking.

permalink
report
reply
81 points

You can see she really didn’t want to address it at first. Like she immediately apologised, then the host stopped her to ask about it and she cringed when she said he had touched her. Only after the host put a stop to everything did she call the guy out on it, which she handled really well.

It seems to me her first instinct was that this could become a real problem for her, and she was safer just letting it go. It’s also probably way more normal for her than for the host.

One good thing is she is the visible person and the guy who assaulted her was just some random guy, so public opinion should easily go in her favour.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points
*

As a woman who got harassed nearly every day in the country I lived who responded to at least 40% of those with yelling and middle fingers, it’s not fun, it takes a toll on you, and some days you have to choose your battles carefully. That being said, I carried a taser gun and it made my life easier. When I left to another country that was safer, I gifted said taser gun to an American girl who was in that country in exchange and was sexually harassed by a taxi driver who drove her somewhere “hidden” and tried to kiss her and she found it hard to handle things after that.

Edit: made some things bold

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

You’re absolutely right, and I wasn’t trying to criticise her for any of her decisions here. Honestly without the host intervening she was probably making the best choice to keep herself safe.

It clearly would’ve been easy for everyone involved to dismiss the moment and let it go if they’d chosen to, and it seems like she didn’t feel like she could do anything until her host stopped things and gave her implicit permission to confront the guy.

I’m AMAB NB myself, but grew up pretty cis-passing, and I would’ve been pretty oblivious to most of the things she was doing here because my upbringing allowed me to be.

My point in making that comment was to help other oblivious AMAB folks see that the extraordinary part of this situation wasn’t the fact a woman was assaulted, because that is going on constantly. The extraordinary part is the attention it received, and the fact both her and the host took action to make sure it got attention.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

Yeah. She’d probably been passively (or maybe even actively) taught that ignoring and tolerating abuse was the “professional” thing to do… that it was the price she had to pay for being a woman.

Fuck that noise. I’m glad to see this issue getting the attention it deserves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
101 points

Good on the anchor for sticking up for her. The reporter was just going to downplay it. She needed someone to take her side. She rocks for using that encouragement to confront the guy, and the anchor set a fantastic example by speaking up. He even said to her “excuse me for interrupting you.”

It feels good to see people support each other like this. They’re both awesome.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Can anyone translate the whole video for me? Spanish is rusty and I am curious what exactly everyone is saying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

The reality women live with is even in this thread, which has more than one comment focusing on how stupid this guy was to do it on camera, rather than how stupid and disgusting it is to do it at all.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

I guess because he’s a jerk for doing it, but a really dumb jerk for doing it on camera.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The weirdest part for me in this video isn’t even the groping, it’s that weird pat on head that looked like: okay little girl, bye

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

They say that rape isn’t just about sex, but power.

If you look at the grope and head pat in that lens, they slot right in to him showing her he has power over her life and that she has none over him.

Doing it on camera really flipped that on his head, but it also highlights the realities of womans day to day life, watching out for these shitheads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Those aren’t mutually exclusive. Doing that with no cameras is disgusting, doing it on camera is that and stupid, proving what many of us thought of the people doing that in the first place

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

What the fuck?? This is so stupid I have a hard time believing it’s real. Does this guy have a single digit IQ or something? He did this in front of a camera. And then he came back after leaving. This guy doesn’t need to go to jail, he needs to go to an asylum and attend classes made for 5 year olds where they teach about consequences for actions. This is like, teenage dare level stupidity.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Also, that he ruffles her hair after the accusation. Like, I can’t decide if that was belitteling like “yes, little stupid girl, just image that I touched your butt” or a powermove “I touched you and I touch you again, watch me”. Either way, that this really a horrible view and show cases how much this behaviour is ingrained in some people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 273K

    Comments