159 points

pretty fucking close to vote buying if you ask me

permalink
report
reply
85 points

I’ll take his money and then not vote for Trump. It’s not like he can tell.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

Honestly, I kinda hope he can tell. I’d love for there to be a paper trail of me accepting $100 from Elon and then voting for Harris. Hell, I’d put the money toward renting a highway billboard as close to the Tesla HQ as possible showing the receipts. Fuck him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

Get the money, donate to Harris

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

He can, though. In another post about Cards Against Humanity’s project, they explained how criminally easy it was to create a PAC, request and acquire voters information. They can see your registered voter information and who you’ve voted for in the past.

Edit: Someone corrected me that you can’t see exactly who people voted for, but, you can see party affiliation, and if you voted. Going by that data, he can assume you voted for the party you’re affiliated with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Voting records don’t show whom you voted for. They do show party affiliation, which they can infer from.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’d like to see that source. The voter information should be limited to their registered address and what primary or caucus they voted in - not their individual votes, which are anonymized. At most, a PAC should only be able to infer (from the voter information alone) a likelihood of which political party the voter is associated with. Now, if they take that voters info and combine it with open source intelligence, social media, advertising intelligence/marketing data, they can make much better assumptions.

At the locality level, the voter is issued a serialized ballot. The local township, city, whatever keeps a log that “voter x received ballot Y”, but that’s where the association ends. Before being tabulated (read by the optical scanning machine and dropped into a sealed chamber), an election official removes to perforated strip containing the serial number, and the voter deposits the ballot (deserialized) into the tabulator. There is no input to the tabulator to indicate which ballot, or which voter was just processed.

The registration receipts and ballots (without serial numbers) are kept by the locality under seal for a designated retention period.

Source: local election official

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Highly doubt Musk will pay, also hilarious that the reason is “to protect constitutional rights” when the person who he is endorsing has 0 integrity for that asides for freedom of his own speech…

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

And only the speech where he lies, or is racist, or sexist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

The term you’re looking for is bribery.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

The term is actually “electioneering.” And, he’s getting close to the illegal kind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
114 points

Jesus titty-fucking Christ. If someone like George Soros were paying people to vote for Harris, right-wingers would be losing their collective shit and flinging it at the moon.

The double standard is amazing.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

They don’t care about truth, or consistency. They care about power. Specifically, the power of their in-group.

Conservatism has been aptly summarized as “There must be in-groups for the law to protect but not bind, and out-groups for the law to bind but not protect.” That’s pretty much the whole thing. Conservatives are, in a kind of fundamental way, bad people. They value the in-group far too much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

I thought I remembered Michael Moore buying ramen and stuff to get students out to vote and he got in trouble for that. https://www.acslaw.org/?post_type=acsblog&p=1035

Turns out it was overturned or ignored, but didn’t stop republicans from whining.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

…which, at this point, makes it completely predictable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The double standard is amazing.

“Yes, but I’m right.”

They think their collective belief in the correctness of their group identity is more important than law. This explains why right-wing politics doesn’t care about consequences.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Well yeah, but this a white guy doing it-- so you know…it just CAN’T be wrong!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Cards Against Humanity is doing this btw.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Clarification: CAH is taking advantage of the bullshit laws that allow Elon to do this

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

And not pocketing the money

permalink
report
parent
reply
85 points

I really liked this line:

But it’s also possible that Musk is simply doing the rich guy thing—and the classic rich tech guy thing—of walking into a new situation and assuming all of his ideas are important.

What a chud.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
73 points
*

You can tell capitalists are getting desperate when they start offering brides … bribes … to voters during an election

EDIT: beautiful how a simple typo can grab people’s attention so much

permalink
report
reply
27 points

Is that an unfortunate typo? Or are they also offering brides alongside monetary bribes?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Trump is about due for a new one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Nah, he found someone as morally bankrupt as him and they’re as happy as two peas in a pod.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Tell me more about the brides. Asking for a friend.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

They are Russian.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That’s ok but are they sturdy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Correction:

You can tell capitalists are getting desperate when they start offering brides to voters during an erection

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

*Erection:
You can tell capitalists are getting desperate when they start offering brides to voters during an erection

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes, that’s what I said. Thank you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

I’m going to slap the next person who tells me racism is over and everyone is treated equal.

How the hell is this even LEGAL? This is the state of our country? Really? Blatant bribing? Corruption? And it’s STILL a close race?

permalink
report
reply
5 points
*

the fucker is basically telling how he is going to cause horrible damage to americas economy yet those people still want to vote him. I wonder if they just want to destroy their country so awful people can remake it into something terrible. If they succeed, soviets will win in the end, as didnt they blatantly gloat at some point how they will destroy america from within? This whole thing has been fueled by russia from the beginning after all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Racism is over and everyone is treated equal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Not you, only because you probably would enjoy it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Seems racist…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 21K

    Posts

  • 526K

    Comments