As the title states I am confused on this matter. The way I see it, the USA has a two party system and in the next few weeks they’re either going to have Trump or Harris as president, come inauguration day. With this in mind doesn’t it make sense to vote for the person least likely to escalate the situation even more.

Giving your vote to an independent or worse not voting at all, just gives more of a chance for Trump to win the election and then who knows what crazy stuff he will allow, or encourage, Israel to get away with.

I really don’t get the logic. As sure nobody wants to vote for a party allowing these heinous crimes to be committed, but given you’re getting one of them shouldn’t you be voting for the one that will be the least horrible of the two.

Please don’t come at me with pro-Israeli rhetoric as this isn’t the post for that, I’m asking about why people would make such choices and I’m not up for debate on the Middle East, on this post, you can DM me for that.

Edit: Bedtime here now so will respond to incoming comments in the morning, love starting the day with an inbox full 😊.

Edit 2: This blew up, it’s a little overwhelming right now but I do intent on replying to everybody that took the time to comment. Just need to get in the right headspace.

156 points

Remember that in online spaces (and IRL in reality), there are astro-turf/sock puppet accounts that will make claims to sway public opinions.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Yeah like all of these people out here telling me to vote for genociders. There’s no way that real humans would think so little of Palestinian lives, right?

Right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

And who, of those who aren’t mathematically precluded by the flawed system we are currently stuck with from having a chance at winning, can you vote for that isn’t about to help Isreal with their genocide? Trump is even more favorable towards that policy than Biden is, and while Harris isn’t Biden, it seems hard to imagine she’d be much worse than current administration on that issue. One of the reasons to vote for Harris is because, despite all her administration would likely do there, having her in office would almost certainly result in fewer Palestinian deaths than Trump would.

Suppose you have two buttons. If you press one, it kills someone. If you press the second, it kills two people. If you don’t press the first button, someone else is eagerly waiting who will press the second. Whoever has placed the buttons here, has enough power that neither the buttons nor the other person are within your personal ability to harm at the moment, and you have neither the time nor the popularity to amass enough people to change this before the other guy pushes the “kill two people” button. Your only options are to press one or press neither and allow the second be pressed. If your answer to this scenario is “I press neither button, because pressing the first kills someone, don’t you care about people’s lives!?”, then you are not choosing morality, you are choosing selfishness, because you care more about the notion that your hands will be clean than about the net life saved if you press the button that kills fewer people. In fact, the blood is as much on your hands by inaction if you decide to reject your choice, as it would be had you killed the additional victim yourself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

And who, of those who aren’t mathematically precluded by the flawed system we are currently stuck with from having a chance at winning, can you vote for that isn’t about to help Isreal with their genocide?

When you are offered two candidates and both support genocide, including one being an active part of the current one, you can say, “no, never again means never again” and work against both rather than pretending you now have to support genocide.

Trump is even more favorable towards that policy than Biden is, and while Harris isn’t Biden, it seems hard to imagine she’d be much worse than current administration on that issue.

You should believe your lying eyes and see that Biden has gotten your consent for genocide, with Harris helping. The genocide has only ramped up as the election draws close.

There is not worse that can be done. It is full, unequivocal support for basically anything Israel wants for genocide including the weapons and supplies on which they depend to carry out this genocide. If anything, Dems are more effective at this kind of thing, as they secure European support and offer better stipulations to the Israelis around when to escalate and when to play it a little cooler.

Though your electoral logic is seld-defeating anyways. Your consent for the lesser evil keeps you politically anemic and unable to have solidarity with those who need it. You make yourself subservient.

One of the reasons to vote for Harris is because, despite all her administration would likely do there, having her in office would almost certainly result in fewer Palestinian deaths than Trump would.

This is a fantasy.

Suppose you have two buttons.

I am not interested in childish metaphors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

You know how you can trick a stupid fucking child into doing what you want by presenting them a false choice of two alternatives you’re happy with? “Do you want to go to bed now or after one more show?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Trump is even more favorable towards that policy than Biden is, and while Harris isn’t Biden, it seems hard to imagine she’d be much worse than current administration on that issue.

What liberal brain rot is this?

Biden is fully engaging with his policy of genociding Palestinians. Harris has said that she will carry on with the policy with absolutely no change.

The fucking dissonance you people walk around with is astounding!

And before you come out with the usual other shit floating around your vacuous head, no, I’m not advocating voting for the shitty pants trust fund rapist.

You people cannot seem to grasp that what is being done in the Levant will be done to you. The DOD had just updated it’s rules so they can use lethal force against you.

It’s coming and you’ll are too fucking partisan to realise that you’re turkeys all voting for Christmas!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

having her in office would almost certainly result in fewer Palestinian deaths than Trump would.

Current dead baby count would disagree

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

If both of them support genocide, but one also supports banning abortion, the ethical choice is to vote for the one that won’t ban abortion.

If you’d rather wait until a candidate arrives that agrees with you on every issue, that’s fine, but you’ll probably never vote, and in the meantime, by not voting, supporting whichever candidate you like less.

While there’s no honor in the presidency, there is honor in doing what you can to reduce harm, and if you can’t reduce harm to the Palestinians, at least you can reduce harm to American women and girls.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Never again means never again for anyone.

Trying to lesser evil genocide makes you complicit.

Repeat after me: “I am against genocide and will not vote for genociders”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The comprador government of the West Bank is just that, compradors. You should care about the people who live under a comprador government, yes.

The government of Gaza is led by those taking direct militant action against their genocidal settler colonial invaders. They fight and die alongside their people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Pray tell, which elected leaders?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Fucking brain broken if you think the bots are on the side opposite entrenched power

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

There are, but not on Lemmy, because Lemmy is still much too small to bother with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Funny, good one

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Are you a Lemmy sock puppetry expert? Because I am.

Which Lemmy admins are saying there are astro-turf/sock puppet accounts? Because I haven’t heard any.

There is the occasional spammer or corpo shill, who is quickly dealt with, and that’s about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

Good point. Although, I would question whether Lemmy is such a place as we really don’t have the numbers to warrant the effort, imo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I disagree - it feels like Lemmy is seeing the same kind of shills that 4chan saw in the last several elections. These bad actors are trying to sway dems to vote third party or not vote at all “in protest” across many small and large online spaces.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Are the shills in the room with us right now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

We get drug spam and stock spam, no reason to expect that political spam is any less likely.

Lemmy has a huge amount of hardcore lefty’s. If you can get them to not vote, and especially if you can get them to tell their friends not to vote, that is a big win.

Astroturfing/sockpuppeting is dirty cheap to do, so no reason not to try.

You do see some users here that will post continously on about a certain topic repeatedly, with no other opinions. They might be legit, but I have my suspicions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

“Hardcore lefties” have a very different understanding of the value of their vote, which is to say, it means very little.

Have you deigned to ask them questions?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

It is not currently such a place. I’ve yet to hear a Lemmy admin say otherwise.

Edit to add: Russiagate conspiracy theorists want it to be true so they can simply dismiss voices that contradict their beliefs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’ve seen cryptospam, drugspam, generic adspam on here. Why would a political astroturfspam be a conspiracy theory?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

takes no effort with modern technology

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

yeah, mostly CIA and Israeli bots/paid posters. all of reddit is astroturfed. All social media is controlled by the feds as well. Look into the twitter leaks to see how they do it. Mintpressnews also has great articles about feds in censorship positions in all these social media companies ranging from Facebook to TikTok (100% CIA controlled btw).

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

Is there any evidence of these CIA/Israeli bots / paid posters?

If somebody makes a pro-Israel post, maybe they just genuinely support Israel (I wouldn’t say that’s my view currently - I think both Israel and Hamas are wrong because both have killed civilians).

Edit: your downvotes aren’t evidence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Who has killed more civilians?

By multiple orders of magnitude?

This is like “Man, I don’t like the sun and light bulbs, they’re both so bright.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
29 points

i wonder how much of a single issue a genocide is

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Upvoted for proving the point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

And there it is, liberal genocide support going mask off yet again

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

What did you think about Hitlers economic policies?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The single issue? Genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Does your logic apply to single issue (anti Trump) voters?

dumb as fuck

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yep

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

They believe that taking a moral stand against the Democrats, who are supporting Israeli genocide, is worth it even if that means that Trump, who even more fervently supports Israeli genocide, becomes president.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Even calling it “Israeli genocide” is transferring responsibility. “Supporting” is an understatement. The democrats ARE THE ONES DOING THE GENOCIDE. Biden can stop it with a single phone call. Israel is not an independent state; it is a subordinate of the US.

Telling people to vote for your party, a nazi party, at the absolute peak of your depraved inhuman bloodthirst, because the other side might be worse, is the most cynical fucking thing I’ve ever heard.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

I honestly appreciate the downvotes as a counter of angry people shamed into silence

Good. You should be fucking ashamed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Yeah the “democrats are the REAL nazis” is tiring when you get comments from the republican hero agent Orange: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/10/trump-military-generals-hitler/680327/

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

As I said, I want to personally thank you and your ilk for Trump winning this election.

Congratulations. You let the fascists win to “stick it to the libs”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Yeah, you’re misreading that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So when Trump wins and my rights to exist are stripped even further, I’ll be sure to thank you for it

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

stop voting for genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The dems are not bringing your rights back. Project 2025 is happening regardless of who wins president due to how captured the court system is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Republicans and Democrats were unable to stop legislation from the Judiciary with Roe v. Wade and later Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Super PAC’s donate multiple lifetimes of dollars to Presidential candidates in a quid pro quo system protected by the first amendment under Citizens United v. FEC. Americans outside the oligarchy will never exhibit their influence.

If oligarchs find your existence icky, they have the power to remove your “right” to exist. You lack the power to prevent it. Instead of thanking anyone, I suggest we take the power back. Punch up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Everything is always about YOU 🤡

Pathetic…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

the most cynical fucking thing I’ve ever heard.

Yes, it’s cynical. It’s based on the jaded belief that democracy is 90% dead, and Americans only get to make one of two meaningful choices.

The opposite belief, which is that America is a democracy and you can vote for whoever you want, is hopeful and patriotic. It puts a lot of trust in the American system. It shows faith that politicians have our best interests at heart, and that it’ll all work out if you just say what you want.

Is that how you want to describe yourself? As a patriot who believes in America? It doesn’t seem to align with your worldview, but it’s what your actions are saying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

you’re a silly one

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

I’d rather vote for the party that’s 85% nazi than 100%. And in a world where it’s entirely unrealistic that anyone else can win between past-the-post voting and voter disenfranchisement, that’s the best we’re getting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

This was a meme like 6 years ago, that we’d get to the point that US democrats would accept a candidate that’s 99% pro-genocide compared to the 100% republican one. It’s worked, and now democrats are falling over themselves to defend this genocide and their party’s staunch material support for it.

Keep voting tho, its working great so far. The USA keeps improving by doing the same thing over and over again. /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

holy shit they’re actually doing the 99% hitler meme now, this country is cooked

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

I genuinely do believe we’re going to look back this time as inexcusable. Right now, Netanyahu’s extreme right flank is now advocating for settlement of the parts of Gaza that have been ethnically cleansed. Specifically, they’re saying that as long as the army stays there for a permanent long-term occupation, that can be the first step to proceeding with settlements.

It’s so much worse than even the Iraq war. I’ve seen by some estimates that the Iraq war displaced 2 million people, and the deaths, before they stopped counting, were between 100,000 and a quarter million.

I think the deaths and displacements in Gaza probably are going to exceed those, and it’s concentrated in a much smaller area, and it’s horrifyingly closer to affecting the whole population.

Simply put there’s no excuse for this moral atrocity.

And here’s the but: I don’t see how a strategic attitude of indifference to who runs the State department brings it closer to an end. And I don’t see that that attitude is one of even pretending to try for an alternative. I do think supporting politicians especially in their Democratic primaries is a positive step. And I do think, as with the Iraq war, galvanizing a sea change and discrediting everyone who is associated with what happened in Gaza is necessary. I believe it is urgent to do something, and the actual channels of aid that can meaningfully do something right now exist entirely outside of party infrastructure of either party. But I also think, for how true that is, using that to lose sight a very real and very serious differences between the parties that also affect human welfare in numerous ways, would be to needlessly visit tragedy upon tragedy. I wouldn’t want to lose American democracy into the bargain, and I don’t think it’s nuanced to be in indifferent to that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

tl;dr: “Can’t beat them, might as well join them!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

it’s the greater Israel project. they openly talk about it

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

nice hasbara

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Describe “even more”? In what specific material ways would trump increase support for Israel?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Trump has been deliberately framing himself as a protector of Israel who supports them doing whatever they want to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

European here, stuck in the middle of all this.

Please vote Harris.

The winner of this ellection will be the president of all americans, not just of its supporters.

an election is just a nudge in one direction. real change takes many electoral cycles or a revolution.

If you want to do a revolution please do that on your own time or think long term electoral strategy.

Dont be stupid, be usefull. Even if it hurts.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Obama dropped an average of 60 bombs every day on the middle east and north africa during his presidency.

The US isn’t a democracy, and it’s elections are nothing but theatre. I recommend asking about this on lemmygrad or hexbear also.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

it’s the famous Dessalines of github US atrocities fame :D :D

permalink
report
parent
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 7.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.7K

    Posts

  • 310K

    Comments