49 points

Most, if not all, Apple devices look almost exactly the same as their sibling devices.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

That doesn’t seem very good for the price.

permalink
report
reply
34 points

When… have their products ever been competitive on price? Not even shitting on them, but there’s always been an Apple tax.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Honestly, now that they put in a reasonable amount of RAM, with a processor that strong and some external storage, 600USD isn’t that terrible of a price.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I’d need to see what comparable x86 processors and graphics are to the M4, but yeah, this seems like it could be one of the first Macs in a while to be really competitive on price. It doesn’t happen often but it does happen. Fifteen years ago, a couple years after Macintosh went to Intel, I bought a Mac Pro. I had a hard time comparing prices at first, but once I finally realized I needed to be looking at workstations instead of desktops the Mac Pro actually came out to be about $300 less than identically spec’d workstations from Dell and HP. That was about the price of a full retail license on Windows Vista Ultimate (or later Windows 7 Ultimate). With Boot Camp and feeling like I could find Windows on sale for less it actually seemed to make the most sense with the added benefit of access to both Windows and OS X. It was frankly the best Windows machine I’ve ever used. No bloat, and all the drivers worked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The SSD size is silly though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

They’ve often been on par with competitors tbh.

The X1 Carbon isn’t much cheaper than a Macbook Air and ditto for Dell XPS vs Macbook Pro. The Macs have better build quality usually, but the PCs would get better specs. RAM, at least.

The Galaxy S series stars in the same range as iPhones do, though you get a better screen. But in the Ultra and Pro Max versions the screens trade blows and the iPhone is apparently cheaper.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

When I was last comparing laptops a few years back I was seriously leaning towards the Framework AMD. It was clearly a tradeoff between Apple’s displays, trackpad, lid hinges, CPU/GPU benchmarks, and battery life, versus much more built in memory and storage, a tall display form factor, and better Linux support. Price was kinda a wash, as I was just comparing what I could get for $1500 at the time. I ended up with an Apple again, in the end. I’m keeping an eye on progress with the Asahi project, though, and might switch OSes soon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Back in 2009-2010 I bought an entry level 13" MacBook Pro because it was fairly competitively priced compared to other options with similar specs, but the MBP had by far the better battery life, display quality, touchpad, and probably keyboard. It was easily worth the upcharge for those factors, so no real Apple Tax.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Mac Mini M1 when it was released was a good deal compared to same form factor machines at similar prices. Same for the M1 MacBook Air, despite the base RAM.

That advantage lasted a while, too, considering battery life and build quality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Still running an m1 Mac mini right now, it’s a damn good machine, but the performance gains over the years on the m series chips haven’t really forced me to upgrade yet. As for gaming, I just use GeForce now to play my steam library and it’s awesome, it’s a really great combo. The 8GB of ram is lacking, but I’m using GFN and not pushing it too hard, so I don’t notice any meaningful performance problems. I’m also not editing photos or videos, so that probably helps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

For the Mac Mini? The Apple Silicon line has always been a really good value for the CPU, compared to similar performance from Intel and AMD. The upcharge on RAM and storage basically made it break even somewhere around 1 or 2 upgrades, if you were looking for a comparable CPU/GPU.

For my purposes the M1 Mac Mini was cheaper than anything I was looking at for a low power/quiet home server, back in 2021, through some random Costco coupon for $80 off the base $599 configuration. A little more CPU than I needed, and a little less RAM than I would’ve preferred, but it was fine.

Plus having official Mac hardware allows me to run a Bluebubbles server and hack Backblaze pricing (unlimited data backup for any external storage you can hook up to a Mac), so that was a nice little bonus compared to running a Linux server.

On their laptops, they’re kinda cost competitive if you’re looking for high dpi laptop screens, and there’s just not really a good comparison for that CPU/GPU performance for power. If you don’t need or want those things then Macs aren’t a good value, but if you are looking for those things the other computer manufacturers aren’t going to be offering better value.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

M4 reportedly outperforms Intel’s Core i9-14900KS by 16%. That CPU alone is over $600.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I don’t think anything with the word “intel” can be taken seriously in value comparisons…

When I got my last laptop I ended up with a MBP because there were no high end options for Linux laptops with AMD. Now the options are better, but back then, the only realistic alternative to a MacBook Pro would have had a third of the real-world battery life if not less, even if I decided to spend £3k. That didn’t seem like an acceptable compromise so there were virtually no laptops in existence that could compete with an M2 MBP.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

True. It was just the first comparison I saw when I searched for M4 benchmarks.

Really, AMD isn’t even a fair comparison because we’re talking about an ARM SoC here. So maybe the Snapdragon dev kit that ultimately got cancelled?

It was supposed to be $900, for a special Snapdragon X Elite, 32GB RAM, and 512GB SSD.

cpubenchmark.net has comparisons to other X Elite chips, putting them pretty much on-par with the M4 or maybe just below it.

With the same amount of RAM and storage in a Mac Mini, you’re talkin $1200. So, $300 premium for a device that’s maybe 2-8% better, has retail support instead of being a dev kit, and… well, actually exists. It’s not a slam dunk for the Mini, but it’s clearly not a rip-off either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Aside from the pitiful SSD it seems good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

$600 gets you 16GB of RAM and 256GB of storage. You can get better hardware for less.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Have you factored in the processing power and the cost of an equivalent processor?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Is there even a better ARM SoC? All I know of is the Snapdragon X Elites, which are either on par or slightly below the M4. And you can only get them in a laptop form factor at this point, cuz they cancelled the mini-PC dev kit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Its not, you can build your own mini pc with a ryzen 9700X, more ram, more storage, and it would probrally cost less. In addition you wouldn’t be locked into the Apple ecosystem and you would be able to upgrade it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Some people like the Apple ecosystem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Same, I loved building my own PC but I also have a Mac mini because Macs just ✨fucking work✨ always

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sure. And you can buy a dirt bike cheaper than an ATV. Yet people still buy ATVs.

I’m not gonna do iOS dev or ML on a GMKtec no matter how cost-effective it is, just like I’m not gonna play x86 Windows games on a Mac even if I win a maxed-out unit in a giveaway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ok, let’s put together a mini PC with a ryzen 9700X for under $600. What case, power supply, motherboard, RAM, and SSD are we gonna get? How’s it compare on power, sound, form factor?

It’s an apples to oranges comparison, and at a certain point you’re comparing different things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
  • Case/mothedboard: minisforum ms-a1
  • Power supply: external
  • Ram: ddr5l (sold separately)
  • ssd: pcie gen 5
  • power: slightly worse single core performance (can be overclocked) slightly better multi core performance (with a better AM5 CPU)

My point isnt that Apple sucks and nobody should ever buy it, my point is that you’re paying an Apple premium for a fully assembled computer. That premium is greater over time since you cannot upgrade it, meanwhile every part of the minisforum ms-a1 can be. Its convenience and a premium product vs freedom and upgradability. I cannot say that every person does or should value freedom but I do and thats my opinion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think the issue is - I would buy something positioned as a very long-living and good machine for that price.

Like Sun workstations were. The design and experience of everything.

The issue with Apple is that these things look expensive, temporary and inconvenient (that feeling of concept nice to look at … for a day or so). And what’s worse, they are.

I hope Larry Ellison gets geriatric demented sooner, maybe then he’ll try to resurrect Sun as a separate entity. Just joking, even to Larry Ellison I only wish good health.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
2 points

Oh. F*ck Larry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
21 points

It’s kinda cute

permalink
report
reply
131 points

Mac Mini’s are cool, and I appreciate that Apple has some of the most experienced and talented designers in the world… But they put the power switch on the bottom. You have to lift it up and turn it over to turn it on and off.

permalink
report
reply
13 points
*

The new design seems more lifted, I think it should be fine to fit your finger below there without having to lift it up yourself. At least for most people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

In case it wasn’t a joke, I imagine it would be high enough for your finger to just poke under it to push the button, like you would a monitor with buttons on the bottom of the screen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Doesn’t look like it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’re using it wrong: Just place the whole computer upside down on your desk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

A reporter at the Verge just had a hands on with it and confirmed that you do, unfortunately, have to lift it up.

there’s no way to reach the power button, which is on the underside of the computer, without lifting it up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Apple reported to say that you don’t need to use the power button because Mac Mini is not required to shut off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
95 points
*

Remember these are the same engineers who put the Magic Mouse charging port on the bottom, making the mouse unusable while you charge it

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Honestly, the mouse charger screams marketing or management. Apple’s brand is partially form over function.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What marketing genius uses a mouse upside down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It was very likely a designers decision. It forces the use the use case they wanted; wireless mice should be used wirelessly. I would bet they fought marketing and management to get this on the final product.

Marketing would want the mouse they can advertise as being useable with and wireless. Female ports are easier to mount and manufacture with they have depth to set the socket. So a plug on the front is much cheaper and easier to manufacture.

The fact the charging cable doesn’t get used in motion means it will last longer and you wouldn’t have people useing fraying cables on the front of their mouse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

PARTIALLY!? The Vision shipped without a lens cover. It did ship with a cover for the outside face.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Yeah and I hear they might bring that back lol. Why haven’t there been any wireless mice that use wireless charging? They could include a super thin coil that you could place under any mouse pad. It doesn’t even need to charge fast so heat shouldn’t be an issue. Just trickle charge when it’s not being used.

Edit: guess I should have searched first. Of course it was Logitech

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

People treat it like a mistake but not be able to use the mouse while it’s plugged in is the entire point of the design. Right or wrong the Apple designers thought a cord drag was a bad experience and designed to prevent it.

They probably looked at their target audience and realized there was a certain percentage of folks that would just leave the mouse on the cord 24/7 and wanted to prevent that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

People treat it like a mistake, but the Emperor has no clothes and people are catching on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

I don’t understand why this is so hard to understand. You’re supposed to stop using the mouse while it is charging, and use the mouse unplugged. That’s the purpose. It’s not a stupid decision, it just prevents some user’s preferred operation of using the mouse while it is charging

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

They also know their target audience has plenty of people who gobble up every bad design decision and even defend it online years later.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I don’t understand what was wrong with the original version that just took 2 AA batteries. Reaching for the AA charger and swapping cells not awkward enough or something?

Smart and elegant design would be hiding a battery charger in the iMac it self (maybe even use something smaller than AA), not expect you to flip and plug in your mouse every time ya leave it. The Nintendo Switch, while a completely different form factor, is a great example of an elegant (you could even say “wireless”) charging solution.

I’m getting really sick of the Apple esthetic of sticking out wires, be it the mouse or the dozen dongles for every portable device they now make. Uh! Can’t forget the world’s only pen that needs charging, for seemingly no reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Even worse, that was done intentionally. They wanted to prevent retail stores from leaving them plugged in at all times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s not true at all. Apple likes minimalism, and putting ports and buttons where you can’t see them adds to the aesthetic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

But once its on why would you ever turn it off? /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Assuming the desktop takes the same power saving techniques from their laptops, there is no real reason to turn it off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

This but non-sarcastically. I have a Mac mini and I don’t think I’ve ever touched the power button (except after plugging in of course, but then you’re already fiddling)

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I bought my iMac in March 2020… since then it’s been powered down maybe half a dozen times (a couple of those were power cuts) and rebooted (outside of macOS updates) maybe ten times.

It just sits there reliably doing its thing and sucks little juice in power saving so 🤷🏻‍♂️

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

We used to have racks of these things for automated testing …. And eventually they stop responding, so someone needs to power cycle them. In the computer room. In a rack

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I seriously don’t understand why Apple won’t make server macs, with proper server features like IPMI, rack mounting support, virtualization. As a software developer, macs are horrible to work with.

Beyond the nightmare that is code signing and certificates (required even for debug builds), the physical devices are special snowflakes. Getting them to play nicely in a CI/CD system is really difficult. They often freeze or misbehave requiring physical access to fix. Also, if you want to target older OS X or iOS versions, you need to use an older version of XCode (that Apple makes really difficult to find) and an older version of MacOS.

There are many other use cases beyond software development, such as render farms, network storage, backup etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

At the very least, the keyboard functions for power.

There is plenty of room on the front for a power button. Should have removed the headphone jack.

Lol, lmao.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Why didn’t they put the headphone port on the back…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Or on the keyboard?

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

What.

The fuck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The next 900$ monitor stand will attach the monitor at the bottom with the screen facing the desk.

You need to buy the ar/vr set to see what the screen is displaying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You’ll be able to fit a finger under it I bet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Is it meant to stay on forever once you set it up?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The side with the power button is now the top. There is no ports or io on the bottom.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You’re holding it wrong!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’d just get two toothpicks and make a seesaw to press it, although I pretty much never turn off my computers so I still wouldn’t mind too much

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Don’t worry, there will be suitable USB accessories, for just 99$.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That’s trippy. Try following the cable from end to end.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The previous model has it in the back, you can’t even feel it properly because it’s not recessed.

On the other hand the last time I turned off my M1 mini was when we moved. It’s 100% silent and takes less power than a lightbulb when it sleeps, so why would I bother powering it off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Why would you run a lightbulb 24/7?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

A prior model Mac Mini uses 7W at idle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

so you don’t have to turn it on when you enter a room

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

So while it sleeps, it still wastes electricity on literally nothing. Gotcha

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So does anyone’s desktop PC that they’re too lazy to power off and I can guarantee those will waste even more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

But WHY??

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It looks to me like the center part is thicker than the edge so the corner might not be flat against the desk. But I’m completely sure if it’s enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So how do you figure the designers are that good?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

who let the magic mouse engineers loose

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Power Bottom

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I assume that the plinth lifts it high enough for your finger to comfortably fit under.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 544K

    Comments