A few years ago we were able to upgrade everything (OS and Apps) using a single command. I remember this was something we boasted about when talking to Windows and Mac fans. It was such an amazing feature. Something that users of proprietary systems hadn’t even heard about. We had this on desktops before things like Apple’s App Store and Play Store were a thing.

We can no longer do that thanks to Flatpaks and Snaps as well as AppImages.

Recently i upgraded my Fedora system. I few days later i found out i was runnig some older apps since they were Flatpaks (i had completely forgotten how I installed bitwarden for instance.)

Do you miss the old system too?

Is it possible to bring back that experience? A unified, reliable CLI solution to make sure EVERYTHING is up to date?

201 points

Alias update=“sudo apt full-upgrade && flatpak update”

Fixed it for you

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Nice. Your excellent suggestion probably belongs in a meta-package somewhere so that users get it for free when appropriate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Since they’re using Fedora apt isn’t going to do anything, they would need to run sudo dnf upgrade -y && flatpak update

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

appimages though?

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

They don’t update, they are standalone files

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Appimages for in-dev programs usually have an auto-updater that runs when you run the program, too, which is accetapble by my factual and perfect standards. It would be nice if someone put together an appimage store to manage these, I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This is obviously what I was referring to, but yeah…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Thats it … Thats how i do it in every distro inluding nix-env and i’m eine

No need to overengeneer

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If you’re an Obtainium/install from GitHub fan, then don’t forget gam update.

permalink
report
parent
reply
114 points

There has always been the option of installing software from source. The package manager won’t update anything installed from source.

You don’t have to use Flatpak, Snap or AppImage if you don’t want to. If you use the package manager to install everything, it will update everything.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

Except doesn’t ubumtu now force a snap on you even if you try installing a package app?

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points

The solution is to use any of the other hundreds of readily available distributions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Exactly. I dont have flatpak or snap integration installed so packages are packages. I think it was Ubuntu being delivered with snap as part of the OS. As well as CLI ads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’m confused by this. If I run apt install, am I getting stuff from flatpak?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Yes and no, you’re getting stuff form Snap, not flatpak

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You have to check your distros info, but from popular Linux podcasts they were claiming certain distros used the apt get but once the package manager saw what you want it would throw in a snap or flatpak of the same. Not all distros. I think Ubuntu was one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yes. Some packages are just meta packages for their snap versions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

If I use ubuntu I’m somehow forced to use them.

Even on Fedora the average user is presented with many flatpak results when they use the GUI software manager. Not everyone is technically adept enough to check the origin of the app. So it’s kind of being forced on users.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

If you use the Fedora software manager it updates everything at once? It even updates BIOS firmware.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

If I use ubuntu I’m somehow forced to use them.

Yes, that’s why I stopped using it years ago (among other reasons).

Users are not out of options, they don’t need to check the origin of the apps themselves, it’s enough to ask other users what distros don’t do the things they don’t like and use those.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

so ditch this nonsense and use a better distro?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You can use bauh. it is a graphical app manager which can Install and update appimage, deb, flatpak, snap and web apps. https://github.com/vinifmor/bauh

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The package manager won’t update anything installed from source.

emerge lols

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Portage: Am I a joke to you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You are just spreading FUD for the sake of it.

Snaps are updated automatically: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1262058/what-are-the-snap-equivalent-of-apt-get-update-and-apt-get-upgrade/1262059#1262059

Flatpak updates are usually integrated as hooks of the package manager (Archlinux handles this for you automatically, and I’m sure other distros do as well).

And on top of that, there’s also packagekit to handle all of this automatically.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I dont understand how that comment spreads fud. If you think theyre wrong just say it

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

In Mint you can install flatpaks from the software manager and those get updated by the update manager. So it’s all still one click.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Same on Fedora. It’ll even do firmware too.

We’re nowhere near the absolute shitshow that is updating the system and and programs on windows.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The individual pop up for upgrades on windows is probably the single biggest bother… (except the Microsoft bloatware/spyware of course)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’d like to add that it’s even better than that!
You can install apt, flathub and snap (if you want to install it) packages from the same installer, complete with full package info, screenshots and reviews!
You can even compare them by switching quickly via the drop-down!

The updater also checks all three, allowing you to scrutinise every part you want, or just updating it all with one button!

The installer and updater are actually better than using the command line, in my opinion, and I am by no means a stranger to the command line!

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

If you use a graphical tool like gnome software, it will update everything with one click on a button

permalink
report
reply
22 points

And sometimes it will even work!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Oh really. I should probably try that again sometime. Usually I just choose not to roll the dice on gnome, and update through the terminal instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well I did say sometimes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I would really love gnome software to add update on background feature and set update interval (update only once a month, hold update indefinitely etc.)

But fedora software center behavior is the most intuitive and easy compare to other popular desktop OS/distros: Mac, Windows, or Ubuntu.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It does background updates for flatpak. For system, just move to Silverblue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I think it only downloads the update but you still need to click install to install it. I am looking for Google Play / Windows Store behavior, where the store juat keep my app up-to-date in the background, maybe push a notification after update is done or something.

I understand this behavior is not for everyone, but I think it should be a toggle at least.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I love and use Fedora but I still think Mints update manager is the best GUI implementation I ever used for updating, it has all the essentials, is easy to use and looks nice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I have never used mint, so I dont know.

One of the thing that drived me from Ubuntu to Fedora is that Ubuntu has 3 different UI for system, apt, and snap/flatpak update. It feels really segmented.

I personally prefer Gnome experience more than any other DE (including windows and macOS). But mint only include Gnome version on Ubuntu LTS, so it is a bit dated. But no doubt that mint is extremely user friendly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Don’t generalize whatever distro you’re running as “Linux”, especially when we’re talking package management.

permalink
report
reply
-9 points

Isn’t this the case with all major distros at least?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

As far as I know, Ubuntu is unique in its insistence on snaps. I can’t really speak for any others but my system runs fine entirely on native or locally compiled packages known to my package manager.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Nope the major distros use about 3 different package management systems.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.ml

Create post

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
  • No misinformation
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

Community stats

  • 9.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.8K

    Posts

  • 162K

    Comments