-13 points
*

What the fuck do I care what europoors think? I don’t like Jill Stein but they should mind their own business! In America we understand that a country’s domestic politics are only the citizens’ business, that’s why we don’t involve ourselves in any foreign country’s domestic matters

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Jfc…

  1. It’s their, not there.
  2. Climate change does not care about your borders. So of course actual proper Green parties care about green foreign politics.
  3. You’re literally in everyone’s face when it comes to other countries.
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
  1. It’s their, not there.

My bad, fixed

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

That last line tips into “has to be sarcasm” territory. I don’t think anyone believes America doesn’t meddle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Oh shit, I think you’re right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Let’s hope so…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It is sarcasm lmao

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

That’s rich. I’m American, too, but the whole isolationist stance is bs. They are our allies, and whatever happens here effects them as well. You fell for the propaganda, champ.

Also, it’s funny that you don’t choose not to see how much our own country involves itself in the affairs of other countries. Every American knows this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
225 points
*

Breaking news: people with an actual commitment to environmentalism recognize Jill Stein for the obvious Russian shill and extreme threat to environmentalism she is. More at 11.

permalink
report
reply
-11 points

They also recognize the current government as an extreme threat to environment

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

The best thing Stein could do for the environment right now is to quit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Decomposing is also an option.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Decomposition releases greenhouse gases. Better for her to preserve herself in a peat bog or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

Stein pulling out wouldn’t result in more votes for Harris. It would just make more people stay home. I think they’re more worried about greens hitting the 5% national threshold.

Stop assuming these votes are stolen from Harris. She hasn’t earned them.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Say you need a life saving operation. Your choices are: a skilled surgeon who is suspected to have cheated on their spouse, George Clooney from the hit TV show ER, or a mediocre at best veterinarian. This is essentially the state of things. A qualified person, a fictional character, and a person who is tangentially qualified at best.

The country needs a life saving operation. Harris is extremely qualified candidate who at worst carries some of the murky ethical baggage of any career politician. Trump is not only unqualified, but uniquely contraindicated (vindictive, foreign debts, exceedingly old, litany of bonafide legal issues, unrepentant rapist). And Stein is at best a politician shaped object, who is perhaps qualified enough to be a pundit or a podcast host.

For the safety of people of color, for women, for the environment, for the rule of law, for diplomacy, for the economy, there is only one pragmatic choice, and that choice is Harris.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Nothing in Harris’ record shows she’s qualified. She’s done a measurably shit job in every position she’s been in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Really, nothing at all qualifies her? Not her 6 years as an attorney general? Or her 4 years as a senator? Her 3 years as vice president? She’s better educated, has a better resume, doesn’t have 30 something felonies, and isn’t 78 years old. We already tried Trump as president once and America survived by the skin of our teeth. And he has not improved as a candidate in any way in the intervening 4 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

She hasn’t earned them.

The binary choice and the risks of failure have been mentioned so many times, that I worry for people who don’t get it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Both candidates support genocide. A binary choice would be an improvement from what we have now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

At best, one candidate doesn’t do enough to oppose genocide, while the other candidate offers their full throated support, advising that Isreal “just finish the job”. We’re not looking for a perfect candidate, we’re looking for the best candidate. And there is absolutely a candidate with a better track record of compassion, and a likelier chance of fighting the fire rather than fueling it in exchange for political favors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’re right. If they weren’t going to vote for Harris, to me it sounds like they’re perfectly fine with another Trump presidency and the decades of consequences that would follow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Why would European Greens be worried about the Greens getting more than 5%

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I suspect they’re acting as controlled opposition to absorb activist energies. They’re openly shepherding activist voters to a capitalist party in this action.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Wasn’t aware there was an anti-capitalist candidate running, but that’s beside the point. Why do you accuse other countries’ parties of controlled opposition? This doesn’t make any sense. Are you saying they’re propping up Kamala. Many European greens are more left than Stein

permalink
report
parent
reply
108 points

You mean Russian Asset Jill Stein?

permalink
report
reply
65 points

I was talking about intentional spoiler candidate for Trump whom Republicans are scrambling to get on as many ballots as possible Jill Stein, but maybe we’re talking about the same person here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Po-traitor, Po-traito

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Russia controls ¾ of US candidates. Awesome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

A nation that sent his troops on an invasion without boots and helmets controls ¾ of the candidates of the most powerful and advanced nation in the world that spend 10 times as much money in war and propaganda than everyone else, that has thousand military facilities around the globe, that has the biggest mass surveillance network ever seen in history with satellites capable of snooping at every inch of the planet at any given time.

That’s what you are saying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yeah that’s what I am saying. Trump is definitely compromised, for example. And he’s not the only one, look at the Hungarian PM. They would sell their ass if Putin asked so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I see these comments a lot and I’d like to learn more. Do you have any articles on this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
*

Well, start here at a dinner she attended in Moscow in late 2015:

Years later, after Trump was elected, she claimed it was just perfunctory, with no real interaction with Putin. She also claims she received no payment for being there, although we know Flynn received 45k from Putin for his attendance.

Then there is this from 2016 about Russian efforts to divert Clinton voters to stein. She also received intense press coverage by RT, Russians propaganda TV station, that was not banned in the US at the time.

Here she is refusing to call Putin a war criminal, a stance she suddenly recanted days later.

Here is evidence she is currently working with the GOP.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

According to the lesser evil logic receiving money from putin is still less evil than being a fascist or being supporting a genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Thank you for the well cited reply! Scary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

The very same

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

“But I’ve finally gotten David Duke on board!”

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 470K

    Comments