14 points

The civil rights movement did not succeed because of Martin Luther King Jr’s peaceful speech, it succeeded because the Black Panthers bought a firearms en masse and took their rights.
We didn’t win the revolutionary war because we asked nicely and protested peacefully, we won because we ignored the standards of chivalry in war at the time and fought like guerillas.
Anyone who says violence isn’t the answer has never studied history.
Violence is the only thing that’s ever worked.

permalink
report
reply

This is probably a bit too reductive. Violence is sometimes necessary, but isn’t always the best strategy.

In general, the left should take an approach of nonviolent, disruptive agitation, combined with a willingness to use violence in self-defense. Arm up, protect each other, but don’t try to instigate a shooting war.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Moderates only ever succeed with and because of a radical flank demonstrating the alternative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

No. The left should use violence as the tool it is that has always gotten results. Every right and freedom has come from the blood of those who fought.

Leave the peaceful donothings to the lib/centrists, because they won’t do shit anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It smells like Fed in here. ಠ_ಠ

Anarchists have a significant history of using “Propaganda of the Deed” and accomplishing fuck all with it. No shortage of examples among the history of the broader left, too. So yeah, I’m gonna have to call BS on this.

Violence is a tool, and there’s a time and place for it. Don’t be an idiot adventurist about it though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If you’re going to use violence, be very smart about your targets who, where, how. You want those in power to fear, not the average gun toting American who is just trying to pay rent and buy food. If you make that population fear for their lives they won’t hesitate to kill you and in most of this country they could do so legally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m not saying these aren’t salient points, but it’s not going to do much unless you’re talking about rebuilding the underground networks that weren’t needed for the past 90 years.

People in the US shouldn’t have to rebuild backroom abortion Operating Rooms, or places to hide people who are suddenly declared enemies of the state, or places of worship, or even have homegrown defenses built from neighborhoods.

This is absolute insanity that this kind of writing s even happening right now.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Honestly, some of the best post-election advice I’ve seen yet.

Make sure your local community is reinforced to survive the next four years and, if you care about politics, get into it. Too many people enter it to get rich and grift.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

State and Local governments exist as the mainstream source of organization. We’ve lost the national election, but my local state is stronger than ever.

I’d say that the pockets of anarchists might make more sense in a Red State where you’d have enemies all around you. But if you’re in a Blue State with large scale support, the best support structure you can aim for is just your State Government

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I will never join an anarchist movement. But I appreciate the playbook in any case.

You anarchists keep doing what you do. I can never agree with you but it does give hope in this era.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

The great thing about us anarchists is that if you leave us alone and don’t fuck with others in harmful ways we’re really ok with how you want to live your life

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Ish. I got my complaints but this isn’t the topic for me to get into them.

The message of local organization is 100% needed right now. And is something the anarchist movements are good at, I must admit. I’ll complain about methods later, after Trump. There’s fires to be put out right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 446K

    Comments