4 points

This should be beyond illegal.

This kind of white collar crime should be punishable in days for dollars.

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*

The saddest bit is the staggering numbers of non-wealthy Americans who insist our economy isn’t completely rigged against them and rigged for existing capital holders, as if sucking up will grant them access into the little club doing the rigging one day.

They’re the poor deluded bastards that keep us stuck in it. “This is fine haha! I’ll fight you if you try to improve how fine it is haha! Give our glorious job creators everything and pray for rain haha!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Afaik, it is. This news is blown out of proportion. Getting an approval to sell your shares takes like half a year, so these were actually sold way in advance. And he sold basically a couple of shares, compared to what he still holds. They are still scummy, but this is just an attention grabbing article.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

Some rat-off-sinking-ship move? Only in this case the rat also was responsible for the sinking, and leaves with a pile of cash? But then I’m no expert in neither gaming nor stocks, nor ships.

Watching turbo capitalism eat itself live and in colour is rad.

permalink
report
reply
12 points
*

I’m no expert either, but this could be a deliberate exit plan that CEOs do, or if he plans to stick around, it could be a deliberate ploy to buy back shares at a lower price - so even if he bought back everything he sold, he’d be making a big profit. Could also be combined with a ploy to introduce the actual pricing plan they wanted to implement all along, and when they implement it, it won’t seem so bad combined to what they’ve proposed currently, and people, especially those deeply invested in the Unity ecosystem, will lap it up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Or like most CEOs all his trading is done by a 3rd party so there is no conflict of interest

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Sadly none of these options seem to add anything of tangible quality to actual life, just yet another bit of scamming people out of money somehow to add to the general dystopian vibe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Of course, that’s what I was getting it. It’s highly unlikely that all of this wasn’t pre-planned, this stuff is taken right out of the modern CEO playbook.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Isn’t that what executives usually do?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

How is this not insider trading?

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Because it’s scheduled. He probably just has a “sell all of my stock bonuses as I receive them” order to his broker. If he doesn’t actually get involved in the day-to-day decision making of his stock portfolio, then there’s no special knowledge involved in the sale.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That makes sense. Thought there would be a reasonable explanation for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

he didn’t have control over the trades, but he controlled the timing of the announcement entirely.

they knew since june (when the TOS was edited), but waited until last week to drop their stinker of a plan after everyone had already cashed out what they wanted to.

almightysnoo above posted this, which I think is revealing:

Chief among them being Tomer Bar-Zeev, Unity’s president of growth, who sold 37,500 shares on September 1 for roughly $1,406,250, and board director Shlomo Dovrat, who sold 68,454 shares on August 30 for around $2,576,608.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Twitter, Reddit, Netflix, Unity, we keep asking why these corporations are so greedy, but we know the answer. Because we let them be.

Why shouldn’t Google sell your porn history to the Saudis and Russians? Is your use of their search engine/apps going to change if they do? Even if it does, does it effect their sales? Are they actually going to be held accountable for their scumbag actions? Why should they give the slightest FUCK about you, if you’re never going to cause a problem for them?

No. They’re not.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Why do we let execs sell stock received as compensation at all?

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Because stock you can’t sell is worthless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s worth whatever it sells for when you resign. Which, if you did a good job, is way more than what it would’ve sold for the day you got it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

If you’re doing a good job, though, why would you want to resign?

And if, for reasons beyond their control, the stock price is going to fall (e.g. new international tariffs or something), why should they be handcuffed to that decrease in value?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They literally take out tax free loans with the stocks as collateral. Dodging the entire capital gains system.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 543K

    Comments