177 points
*

Yup. I am the international buyer at my Made in America company. We pay the tariffs. We do not absorb them it gets added into the price. And when China is 50-75% lower than American made, another 30% tariff isn’t going to bring the business back here. I kept posting that on my Facebook for weeks before the election. No one listens.

permalink
report
reply
86 points

Everyone seems to be wringing hands about policy, but this is just another datapoint that propaganda won this election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

Even worse, China has already begun moving their Chinese-owned production to Malaysia, circumventing the tariffs on Chinese imported finished goods.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

I heard about this a few months back on a podcast about auto parts. China just shipped the fan belts they were making to a warehouse in Vietnam, rebranded them, and shipped them to the US, tariff free.

They did some sort of chemical analysis on the Made in China and Made in Vietnam belts and the formulation of the rubbers was identical.

Enforcement to counter this would likely eat up too much of the tariff money, so it just won’t be done. China will still get paid the same, and at minimum we’ll eat China’s additional shipping costs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That is really interesting, what is the name of the podcast?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

One possible silver lining:

By removing dirt-cheap goods from the market, this could make it more difficult to ignore the underlying problem: People are not being paid enough for their labor to afford the things they need at home. Instead, they are expected to depend on subsidized/sketchy foreign manufacturing, while corporations and the super-rich are being allowed to extract a disproportionate share of the world’s wealth from everyone else, hoard it, buy favorable legislation and policies, and avoid paying their fair share in taxes. This is already unsustainable; tariffs will make it more obvious.

(I don’t imagine this is why Trump wants tariffs, but perhaps he’ll accidentally place the straw that breaks the camel’s back, leading lawmakers to face either reform or revolution. Unfortunately, I think it’s likely to make things worse for the rest of us before it makes things better.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That is not an issue, that’s how billions of people rose out of poverty.

permalink
report
parent
reply
122 points

Once again, corporate america will use this as an excuse to raise prices more than necessary, gouging the people and stuffing the pockets of CEOs.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

The average American is already stretched to the breaking point with what overinflated goods they can afford. We’ll soon see people either buy just the bare essentials or start stealing at a much higher rate than we already have. Food riots might very well be a thing in the world’s richest country soon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

The genius part is now that Republicans are in charge of the government here, deficits no longer matter, and they will push through huge tax cuts on the rich. These massive tax cuts will only trickle down to working folks in the form of direct rebate checks, just to give Trump an excuse to have his signature all over them. Trump will convince these people that the additional money is to help offset rising prices, and his voters will believe it.

Deficits will no longer matter until after the midterms, and then if Democrats can gain back control of either house of Congress, the deficit will become a big problem again, that can only be solved by slashing more programs. The checks will stop, and Trump will blame Democrats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Yep, and the prices will stay high even after the tariffs are gone.

Grocery stores are the worst about this too. Prices are still absurdly high despite there being no more supply issues from covid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Correct. Trump’s 2017 tariffs raised the price of foreign made dishwashers by 20%. American manufacturers also jacked up the cost of their appliances, in order to match that price that customers were paying for the other brands, pocketing the difference.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That’s the point

permalink
report
parent
reply
98 points

inb4 products that have absolutely no supply chain dependence to China ‘somehow’ increase in price.

permalink
report
reply
23 points
  1. It’s Walmart: what item they sell has no connection to China?
  2. It’s important tariffs actually the board not just China
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I think a lot of their food items aren’t from China, and a few random things are even domestic. I think they sell Lodge cast iron pans, which are fully made in America.

I think his “plan” is a really big tariff on China and a moderate one on every other country?

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

That’s my understanding as well.

But, as the original comment suggested, it doesn’t really matter.

If every other cast iron pan goes up 15% in price, what do you think Lodge will do?

  1. keep their price the same, see modest relative increase in market share with a demand for investment in additional production, knowing full well the tariffs aren’t going to be permanent leaving them over-invested in production whenever they drop the tariffs.

  2. Also raise their prices by 15%, immediately show increased revenue at no additional cost to shareholders next quarter. CEO gets massive bonus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I didn’t know Lodge only used American iron - do you have a link to that somewhere? I tried finding it on Google but couldn’t. It’d be useful to have handy when talking to the “America doesn’t manufacture anything anymore” crowd

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Hey now, the Waltons need some extra cash. Who could even get by on a measly four million dollars a hour in this economy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Gotta prepare just in case one of them gets drunk and murders a person with a car again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points
*

The fact that they’re sending this message now means they will use this as an excuse go raise the prices even higher than nessesary to increase their profit margin. If they really cared about consumers then they should have been yelling from the treetops BEFORE the election.

permalink
report
reply
47 points
*

They said this the last time it happened… During his last presidency.

https://www.reuters.com/article/business/walmart-says-higher-china-tariffs-will-increase-prices-for-us-shoppers-idUSKCN1SM18X/

Walmart Chief Financial Officer Brett Biggs said in an interview that higher tariffs will result in increased prices for consumers.

If only someone else said something about how bad these tariffs would be…

https://www.piie.com/blogs/realtime-economics/2024/trumps-proposed-blanket-tariffs-would-risk-global-trade-war

https://amp.miamiherald.com/opinion/article292867514.html

https://apnews.com/article/harris-economy-ceos-trump-rule-of-law-tariffs-2dd224c63fb4dae47438b6599cc5a968

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2024/09/09/economist-calls-trumps-threat-to-tariff-countries-that-shun-the-dollar-a-lose-lose.html

https://www.euronews.com/business/2024/11/04/how-much-could-trumps-tariffs-damage-europes-economy

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Business/would-trumps-tariffs-trigger-global-trade-war-experts/story?id=114887448

https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/4938752-trump-economic-policies-impact/amp/

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/10/16/politics/trump-fact-check-john-deere-economy

https://www.semafor.com/article/10/18/2024/what-are-the-consequences-of-trumps-tariffs

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-tariff-threat-john-deere-economists-baffled-2024-9

https://fortune.com/2024/08/16/trump-tariffs-trade-war-inflation-economic-policies-joachim-klement/

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/yellen-speech-tariffs-will-increase-inflation-risk-trump/

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I’m not saying no one was warning us against tarrifs, just pointing out that Walmart specifically waited until after trump was elected (apparently twice now) to announce their warning about tarrifs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Walmart doesn’t have an obligation to educate the American electorate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Ah, well let’s hope voters don’t need a third warning just from Walmart to realize the danger the next time this pops up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points
*

Glad they said this after the election

/s

permalink
report
reply
52 points

They don’t give a shit that the customers will be paying more. In fact, if anything, they probably love the excuse to jack up prices further - or further cut their workforce to the bone, or whatever the latest fad in padding executive compensation packages is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I’m sure they probably do - shit as Walmart is a depression in consumer spending is overall bad for them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

What are the customers going to do? Buy from someone else? Wal-Mart is already often the cheapest option around.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 22K

    Posts

  • 547K

    Comments