Does it feel like your X account belongs to you and you can do whatever you want with it? Thatā€™s not true, according to a new court filing from the social media company formerly known as Twitter. Itā€™s an argument that X is making in order to throw a wrench in The Onionā€™s recent purchase of InfoWars, the conspiracy theory media company run by Alex Jones. And itā€™s a great reminder that you donā€™t actually own what you think you own in the digital age.

31 points

Elon Musk parody accounts no longer required to advertise themselves as parody, since they really are Elon Musk now.

permalink
report
reply
48 points

The Onion should allow Musk to block the sale of the Twitter handle, then sue Alex Jones for falsely advertising the sale of an account he canā€™t sell and sue Twitter for infringing on their trademark of the InfoWars brand.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Alex Jones had no say in what was being sold. The Court seized his assets and sold them to pay the people he owes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Not supporting Musk here, but there is some truth to the claim in the headline.

One major danger we currently have is everyone thinking that social media platform accounts are property. They simply arenā€™t ā€“ at least, not yours. If the company decides to terminate your account, they can do that. It will be supported by the TOS. You do not own it.

You also donā€™t own data you put on it. Post a bunch of photos to FB? They own them and can do whatever they want with them.

The danger is that these things are so ubiquitous they appear like information utilities, but they are not. They are corporate services wholly owned by their respective corporations. It is something that makes federated systems stand out from the crowd (not that you own an account there either, but there at least is not a single centralized corporate owner).

More people need to be made aware of this.

permalink
report
reply
114 points

So if X-itter accounts were to threaten persons or places that were in the interest of the state to protect that responsibility lies on Musk?

permalink
report
reply
95 points

Gee wizz, I donā€™t think you understand Capitalism at all. Musk gets the profits and you get the liability.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

If only he were also trying to sue advertisers that no longer want to do business with him. It would be the perfect storm of what is good comes to me and what is bad is yours.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I still donā€™t understand how the fuck that worked. Why would any company risk doing business with shxitter after that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes. Thatā€™s why you face criminal charges and if you dont moderate

permalink
report
parent
reply
92 points

Time to commit crimes with ā€˜ourā€™ Twitter account

permalink
report
reply
39 points

upload full length movies on there, newer ones preferably. itā€™s elonā€™s fault since he owns it all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

probably a good tactic

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.zip

Create post

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. Use original link

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you canā€™t argue your position without attacking a personā€™s character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

Community stats

  • 3.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.7K

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators