-9 points

Ever seen girl math?

“If I preload my Starbucks account with $25 and I go to Starbucks the following week, my order was free.”

“Spending money abroad doesn’t count because it’s a different currency.”

Things aren’t mathing as they should.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

As I recently learned,

“If I return clothes to the store (store credit), but then buy new clothes (using that store credit), those new clothes are free. (No new money spent)”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They aren’t free but they are a sunk cost so you might as well

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

What makes this “girl” math?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Anecdotally, I’ve only heard women use that sort of argument IRL. Kinda falls in the, “This widget is 80% so I’m saving money!”

Well, no, not if you didn’t have to purchase the widget in the first place.

Men are hardly immune, but in my experience it’s more so women.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Stupid people standing on soapboxes saying stupid shit.

Back in my day, people had to dedicate years of their life before they were given the opportunity to stand in front of hundreds of people and tell them things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Brutha - they call it standing on a soapbox for a reason. And soapboxes havent physically been a thing for a real long time. Wait’ll you bear about “stumping”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Sexism 👉👉

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

ah yeah girl math where

“common irrational human psychology” + “deepseated hatred of women” = whatever the fuck this take is

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

well it’s ambiguous. Its also a sloppy way of expressing an increase by 80 percentage points.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

That’s not sloppy, that’s simply wrong

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Fair enough, I’m inclined to agree. It’s a relatively common error though, still leaving it ambiguous outside of circles where you expect people to express themselves with mathematical precision.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

I think it’s ambiguous and the 90% actually makes more sense. If you increase something by 5m you are taking the original value and adding 5m to it. For multiplication you should probably avoid the word increase and say scaled by instead. 10% scaled by 180% is 18%.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

People got this wrong about inflation as well. In 2020 there was actual deflation, and in 2021 there was very minimal inflation, meaning prices were still largely lower or similar as 2019. Then we saw 9% inflation in 2022. Total inflation in 2024 vs the 2019 benchmark was around 15%. Or 3% average per year, which is barely over the baseline. People just hear 9% inflation, completely missing the fact that this was a YoY number relative to the Trump recession.

permalink
report
reply
-1 points

Drag doesn’t know exactly what the problem is, but the official inflation figures cannot be right. Housing is so much more expensive. Food is more expensive. And it’s not 9% more expensive. Drag knows they say the math takes into account the price of rent, but they’ve gotta be lying somehow. It’s impossible that the cost of living is rising so much faster than inflation. Those should be the same. If they’re not the same, someone’s math is wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I keep track of my grocery bills going on 10 years now and 14-15% is spot on for what I buy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Housing is more than 15% more expensive

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

And then there was that bogus article that said Argentina had lowered it’s inflation to 2% and you find out in the article that’s monthly inflation and the yearly figure was like 190%.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If they managed to decrease from 190%/year to 2%/month (which is 27%/year) that’s still an impressive result. Not as impressive to publish when you want to make a click bait.

I’m not sure how to put that to percentages thought, is it 86% and 143 percent points decrease?

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

It’s really pretty simple - if something increases by 80%, you add 80% of whatever it already is… one dollar becomes $1.80… one percent becomes 1.8 percent.

Most people don’t understand it because they’ve seen it done wrong so often, the wrong way seems right.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

I’m quite willing to bet that 70% of the population has no clue that percentages, fractions, and decimals are the same thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think you can increase that by about 7.5/10%

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Is that 7.5 percent or 7.5 percentage points though? :/

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Then odds show up to the party and upend everything we thought we understood.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That’s about 60% more than expected

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You mean 38 percent points higher ?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.7K

    Posts

  • 93K

    Comments