“we are gonna get this guy”

I count 6

permalink
report
reply
1 point

We are going to get this guy… 7

Anyway, the reported counted 4, not the police.

I assume you were trying to insult the police. (As much as i think thats cool, you have aimed at the wrong target)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We gon git dis guy - 5

permalink
report
parent
reply

“We’re” - which is one word - is a contraction of “we are”. The update is 5 words.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

“we’re” is one word.

“Gonna” is slang, but still one word. You’d probably be better breaking that into “going” and “to”.

But still, the sentence is 5 words.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points
*

i bet this will become the first public example of the state surveillance being used to protect our oligarchy from us and; given the democrat’s obstinacy when it came to constructive criticism during the election; americans will treat it as another nothing-burger like they did with the genocide and it’ll become yet another nail in the coffin of the american empire’s decline; besides the election, ukraine’s defeat, afghanistan withdrawal, iraqi wmd’s, etc.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

ukraine’s defeat

Tankie moment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

yes, it’s tankie to spell out reality in the united states.

sometime i wish this were reddit so i could do remind me next year

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

No it’s a tankie thing to say Ukraine lost when the war is ongoing. You just want Putin’s dictatorship to have more land.

Down with Russian imperialism.

Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So is this what people keep talking about when they say they see a lot of tankies in lemmy?

Cause me reading that, OP was implying the likely defeat given current trend, I did not take it as a support of Putin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

yeah the democrats did it. ffs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

this will become the first public example of the state surveillance being used to protect our oligarchy from us

This feels hyperbolic.

The state protects the status quo, including whoever has money. I wouldn’t limit it to surveillance. If we’re just talking about the US, there’s the Battle of Blair Mountain, all of COINTELPRO, Watergate (I think?), etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

the difference is that it’s in the news and has widespread appeal.

those examples were either done surreptitiously or were only academic exercises in privacy; this is real-world application of that academic theory that has the chance of not being suppressed or ignored due to its notoriety.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

the first public example of the state surveillance being used to protect our oligarchy from us

What do you think it has been used for up to this point?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

it’s been done surreptitiously or academic masturbation until now

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The government knows when you masturbate The government knows when you feel alone And it’s getting late and you’re sitting at home

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

That’s actually 6 words.

permalink
report
reply
11 points
*

The reality is: Unless he fled the country he was always going to be caught. That is the point of living in a surveillance state. It was just a matter of time.

As a thought exercise, imagine a bathroom. Ten people go in. One person flips their jacket inside out. Ten people come out. Do you suddenly lose that one person who now has a green jacket instead of a red one? No. You realize the person with a green jacket never “entered” and know something was up.

And now extend that to every single traffic camera, security camera, and so forth in the city and in the country. Because now that “bathroom” is a camera at every major exit in and out of Central Park as well as places where the shrubbery is low enough that you can hop a fence.

And yes, that is a VERY large amount of data. If only we had spent the past few decades learning to represent things as graph problems, how to use computer vision to automate recognition, and so forth.

It was obviously dramatized (and is fascinating from a production standpoint and how much effort they put in to keep the nazi from killing anyone…) but Person of Interest wasn’t some dystopic future. It was, if anything, underestimating what is already possible.

So… here is hoping that ridiculously handsome G went straight to the airport and flew to a non extradition treaty country. Probably didn’t though and is probably going to get picked up at a bus station.


Also: For all the gun nuts who think you rae going to use your closet full of AR-15s to scream “WILDCATS” and fight off the fascists or invaders or whatever? They’ll have access to those cameras too and will be able to figure out what house or cave you are hiding in and send a few drones. So… yeah

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

Unless he fled the country he was always going to be caught

On an unrelated note, they finally found D.B. Cooper

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

Eh. Read up on some of the other big mysteries (stuff like The Somerton Man). Every few years someone who has made it their career/identify has some irrefutable evidence that is either refuted or determined to not be that unique. Or it has been solved for decades but nobody cared enough to make it official and the people writing books/doing talk shows benefit from a “mystery”.

And in this case? McCoy had already been arrested for a similar crime and is long dead. Nobody really cared to keep searching.

But also? We have a LOT more cameras these days and a LOT more ability to process that data without human intervention.


Also, just to make it clear: even if the shooter escaped the country, they are going to be identified (flying on a fake ID is a lot harder and you can bet all the passengers are being checked against the pictures). But it won’t be US cops that catch him (probably just as dead if he doesn’t completely disappear though).

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

This reminds me of the kid from die hard 3 “look around all the cops are busy, it’s christmas you could steal city hall”

Edit: Found it this one https://youtu.be/47YCsqVhgCQ?feature=shared

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 22K

    Posts

  • 553K

    Comments