GiveSendGo stands firmly behind its decision to host content related to Mangione.

“We believe every person is entitled to due process in a court of law — not in the court of public opinion,” Alex Shipley, GiveSendGo’s communications director, said in a statement. “To be absolutely clear, we do not support or condone vigilante justice. However, people have a constitutional right to a strong legal defense, and access to that defense should not be reserved only for the wealthy or those who fit a particular narrative. Our role is to give individuals and their communities the opportunity to fundraise for that defense, because true justice is served when everyone has equal access to a fair trial — regardless of the verdict.”

87 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
33 points

Classic case of lemmy liberals moving the goalpost. “They’re only doing good when they’re helping further my agenda” gtfoh with that stuff

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Someone who knows enough about language to be a commissioned grammar cop should also know that “Liberals” ≠ the Left.

Liberals aren’t the ones decrying th hypocrisy of bad actors. That’s the Left.

An example of typical liberals is the .world admins and mods making it forbidden to discuss jury nullification and removing factual and relevant criticism of Dem leadership, labeling it “misinformation”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

First of all, grammar police ≠ political scientist. Secondly, you probably meant “…decrying the hypocrisy of ‘good faith actors’…”, and quite frankly I don’t care who’s doing the decrying. It’s shifting the goalpost to fit one’s agenda, and if i had to extend that argument to “The Left”, i would.

Furthermore, removal of discussions on jury nullification does not signify the actualisation of any political agenda (jury nullification is a democratic process in and of itself, so it would not serve the mods well if they WERE indeed furthering an agenda). The actions of the mods can simply be viewed as damage control if not anything else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

They’re focusing too much on the payment site. Yes, they have fun raised some very questionable people, but I would also argue that Luigi is a very questionable person at this point.

The focus really needs to remain on the fundraising.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

As a leftist I agree.

Although I don’t agree with them fund raising for Rittenhouse, I respect their decision and I wouldn’t want them to fund for Luigi but not someone I don’t agree with. That’s a double standard that we call out the right for and I think we should practice what we preach.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

Exactly the point succinctly put. You either accept fundraising for all types of criminals or reject it. There’s no in between. It is on the donor to determine whether they would donate or not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

So you don’t think he deserves the same quality of defense as Kyle Rittenhouse?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

You choose how much to pay them from a list. The lowest is $3. So, that’s the “chunk” it’s added on to the donation amount. The only thing the fundraiser loses is whatever the transaction fees are. Which is probably like 3% plus ~$0.25 each

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You can actually write in a $0 tip to the platform

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Oh, that’s nice. Hmm

permalink
report
parent
reply
112 points

I don’t really care. People should be allowed to crowdfund for legal defense fees. Taking away that ability would only further hurt poor people and enable the wealthy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

GoFundMe is scared. The other people need publicity so they’re willing to host it. I’m not a fan of that crowdfunding site, because of their religious background, but I’ll donate if this is the only outlet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Wait why didn’t a gofundme for Rittenhouse violate their ToS??

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-50 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
-52 points

Because a large amount of people have convinced themselves that he’s a working class hero, when realistically he was well on track to become exactly the sort of corpo techbro they despise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Nah screw that. The governor of New York should give him a full pardon. He did nothing wrong. He’s a latter-day John Brown.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

You have nothing but your bias to prove that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-32 points

I’m not sure what bias you think I have here. He’s got a rather extensive and public social media presence, much of which has been backed up and preserved and is accessible for anybody interested to review. His personal interests, Ivy League education, past experiences, are all very well known at this point. Not to mention his family’s significant wealth; his uncle owns a country club and he was set to receive a $100M inheritance from his grandmother.

It’s really hard to see him as anything other than a typical, affluent New England yuppie who lost his marbles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Right, except he didn’t do that, did he.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I don’t care if he’s an extraterrestrial or a gerbil, eating the rich is awesome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

And tbh, a gerbil eating the rich would be adorable 😁🥰

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Maybe he was on track for that or maybe he would have taken a different path, we don’t actually know. But it doesn’t matter because what did happen is he became radicalized against corporations (or at least corporate healthcare) and took action. What he did and what he believes now are far more important than who else he could have become.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

a millionaire

Citation needed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

It’s unclear so far, how much he specifically has.
His family however, is quite wealthy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

I’ve been waiting for which kind of angle they will take to attack Luigi’s character to get people to change their mind about him.

It appears that they are going with the “but he was rich” strategy in hopes that would somehow turn people against him. Comment sections will probably be flooded with this shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Yeah. Hell, even if he IS extremely rich and privileged, that just makes him the GOOD kind of class traitor: the kind with enough privilege to not HAVE to care, but also enough empathy and desire for justice to care anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

100 million from his grandmother, but devided between multiple family members

https://www.the-sun.com/news/13081111/ceo-assassin-luigi-mangione-powerful-family-wealth/

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

His family is actually very rich but I’d still donate as a statement (if it wasn’t on GiveSendGo)

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

If I was Aaron Schwartz’d, I’m certain my family would read the headlines on Fox News and be immediately convinced that I am somehow a bad person and deserve to be in prison as punishment

Just because your parents have lots of money, doesn’t mean it will go to your defense fund.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

Because when people see how much he can fundraise, they might be more willing to do it themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

You too can invest in a brighter future

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I’m investigating some new lighting for my home. I just want to be sure I install it correctly. I don’t want to burn my house down by improperly wiring. I’m also seeing how other people have installed new lights, so I can learn from their successes and mistakes. It’s all very new to me. I didn’t grow up in a house of electricians. But I do know it’s important to measure twice and cut once… so to speak.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Previously, when the chance that most of those fundraiser listings were made by scammers, I wasn’t too concerned with them being removed.

Now that he has a lawyer, surely there’ll be an official listing that will remain. /s

permalink
report
reply
80 points

Well fuck you GoFundMe.

“To be absolutely clear, ***^we are legally required to say that *** we do not support or condone vigilante justice.”

FTFY

permalink
report
reply
25 points

Also fuck you GiveSendGo, even if in this case they’re being kind of cool. Their normal clientele are neo nazis and alt right Conservatives [wikipedia]

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Was just going to say that often, the “Free Speech” platforms tend to be geared to being able to freely hate on people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

yeah! it’s horrible that “free speech” became code for freedom from social consequences of speech ಠ_ಠ

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I hope givesendgo has increased their security since the last time i heard any mention of them…

During the covid convoy in Canada.

I still have that donor list CSV file around here somewhere.

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 22K

    Posts

  • 547K

    Comments