Hello everyone! I know that Linux GUI advanced in last few years but we still lack some good system configuration tools for advanced users or sysadmins. What utilities you miss on Linux? And is there any normal third party alternatives?

3 points

I’ve been using linux for over 25 years and I don’t understand this post. One of the strengths of linux is that you don’t need a gui to do sysadmin.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

And one of the weaknesses is that you require the command line. Choice is good

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think I’m 30 years in, and I came to mention I haven’t used the GUI since ~97.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

For sysadmin stuff? Or for daily use?

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

I generally don’t miss anything graphical, once I learn how to do something from the cli I rarely feel the need to do it graphically anymore as it’s usually a lot slower

The obvious one would be Photoshop and paint.net of course but krita does the trick

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I maybe need to correct my post. I am talking about system utilities like Device Manager or something else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Why would I want gui for those things? CLI is often a better interface. Being able to grep lsusb rather than scanning a gui for an entry is much better. It’s easier to pipe to an email as well. Screenshots don’t allow copy/paste…

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

As a newcomer to CLIs, GUI are great because you don’t need to know what you’re looking for. I can just open the devices window, and they’re all there, with most of the extra hardware stuff that’s not actually a real device already cleaned out.

To do the same with a CLI would take me 10 minutes of looking up what the hardware commands are, 5 minutes figuring out flags, and 30 minutes researching entries to see if they’re important. Even just a collapsible list would make that last step so much easier. And no, I can’t grep for what I need, because I don’t know what I need, I just know something in there is important with a vague idea of what it might look like.

Once I figure that all out for one thing, the best I can do is write that to a notes file so I don’t need to search so far next time, but there’s a good chance that I’ll need a different combination of commands next time anyway.

Not hating on CLIs, just wishing I could figure out how to use them faster.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

👆 exhibit A of why Linux can be difficult for newcomers

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Hmm, what does lsusb do?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Lshw, lsusb, etc and grep do that

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I personally would like a systemd gui. There have been several attempts in the past, but none is maintained.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

SystemD is far too much of a poorly thought through mess to have anything like a sane GUI configuration, it doesn’t even have a sane textfile based configuration. We’re going to have to wait fir SystemD to crumble under it’s own weight and be replaced with multiple, simple, cleanly designed components before we have any hope of a sane config again. Sort of like we used to have before a certain someone/some company (depending on how conspiratorial you’re feeling) decided to come along and muck it all up.

/rant

Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk Rant. You may gather I dislike SystemD quite a lot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

For anyone else reading along: This person is talking out of their ass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I also find that calling systemd “SystemD” is a tell that someone is unfamiliar with or has a conspiratorial relationship to it. It’s named “systemd”, all lowercase (but I’m likely to capitalize it on sentence starts like a normal word). Using an ungrammatical uppercase D at the end of the word, that isn’t even something the creators claim is correct, is … a choice.

(And it’s a choice that reminds me of e.g. how rabid anti-cyclists in Norwegian can’t even spell “cyclist” correctly, but instead consistently use “bicycleist”.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Its far too convoluted. A systemd gui for… DNS? Boot services? User Services? tmp file management? Everything?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s the point. That systemd is convoluted, so a gui could help. And yes, for everything. :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Maybe the system should be made less convoluted.

I mean, do we really need a half dozen network management services, all broken in their own way and none that do everything you need?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

My point is there is no way to sanely create a GUI for something has it’s tendrils in… Everything. In fact, there’s no sane way to do any sort of UI for such a beast.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

All of those are entirely separate components; I have no idea what you’re attempting to imply here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Those are all things systemd manages… as well as logs, udev, etc etc.

What kind of gui too could you even imagine would sanely present all of that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Everything! And a virt-manager like tool for nspawn! And for the faux-cron jobs! Make it as byzantine as systemd itself

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

On openSUSE, I’ve apparently got at least this thing for looking at SystemD services:

Allows viewing the services for the different boot targets, as well as the service files. You can also start/stop services or change their start mode (on boot vs manual).

Well, and there’s a JournalD viewer with filtering:

Not the most developed GUIs, but…

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I have Emacs, and I have my NixOS configuration. That’s all the GUI system configuration I need.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Why use NixOS, when you could just use emacs?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

My Emacs needed a bootloader.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That should be our new slogan:

NixOS: Your Emacs’ bootloader.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sound volume mixer

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Pavucontrol exists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I will look into it

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If you need something advanced install EasyEffects

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.ml

Create post

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
  • No misinformation
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

Community stats

  • 6.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.6K

    Posts

  • 179K

    Comments