137 points

30 days??

permalink
report
reply
29 points

I am assuming she is serving those 30 days in a freezer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Yeah, reading the article, I expected it to say that it was only 30 days, because they realized, she has psychological problems. Punishment doesn’t usually help with that. But I also expected this article to say that the baby will be taken into custody by the state until therapy concedes. And there’s just no mention of any of that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-35 points

A shit reason. She needa to be thrown in an insane asylum for 30 years. See if that helps her psychologucal problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Sounds like you need to take a trip there first buddy. Maybe learn how to spell on the way, jarjar

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Or we could, I don’t know, maybe try to treat her? I would rather live in a world where we treated all mentally ill people, even dangerous ones, with compassion than one where we just lock them up and throw away the key. I personally think that we, as a society, have a moral responsibility to lift each other up, but even if you look at it from a selfish point of view, it still makes sense. For example, it’s possible that someday, you might have a mental break, maybe due to a tragic event or brutal experience, and will need help and wouldn’t you rather be treated kindly rather than being locked away and forgotten about?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Because that’s what we should be doing with people who are mentally ill? Take a look at yourself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

And what will that actually achieve? Beyond costing a fuckload of money and satisfying those that get their dicks hard at the thought of human suffering?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Maybe the judge mistakingly put days instead of years

permalink
report
parent
reply
99 points

And another mother got two years for giving her daughter abortion pills.

Don’t EVER let them tell you it’s to protect the children.

permalink
report
reply
-7 points

What are you driving at?

Who is the “them” in this scenario?

Under what circumstances was the mother protecting children or advocating protecting children?

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

her actions were done as a test to see if the child’s father “gave a f–k at all,”

Because she obviously doesn’t…

permalink
report
reply
46 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

What. The. Fuck.

permalink
report
reply
-3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Fail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Authorities said while the officer was taking McDonald to jail, she said that her actions were done as a test to see if the child’s father “gave a f–k at all,” adding she waterboarded her baby to try and make Neal come back to the apartment.

So she decided to extend the toxic relationship she has with her child’s father to their child. WTAF?! What an absolute piece of shit person.

I read the article hoping to see that she had lost all rights to the child. But nothing about that was mentioned. So she probably hasn’t lost any parental rights.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

She’s not going to lose all rights that fast. My wife’s mom left her alone for days as a toddler drinking toilet water and allowed her to be abused by her johns (no idea if she sold her or was just too fucking high to put a stop to it) and it took years for her to lose all rights. Parents are given a lot of chances to get their shit together even when anyone else would look at them and know that wasn’t ever going to happen.

That’s why when I hear stories about people getting their kids taken away for playing alone in the back yard or walking up the street, I suspect there’s a lot more to those stories. That’s a huge amount of effort and they aren’t going to do that shit over something so minor. But of course the government is going to be all no comment about those things so we only ever hear the side saying how ridiculous it is. That’s right - it’s ridiculous. So why would you believe it went down that way?

I dunno. Kids get such a fucking raw deal. They have no choice who they’re born to and even lots of well intentioned parents fuck it up, to say nothing of people like this crazy fucking bitch in the article.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

It really just depends on the department and agent. Some are willing to go through the effort, but not all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

There’s also no shortage of morons who believe so strongly in the ideal of “family” that they think a kid with an abusive family member is better off than a kid with a kind stranger.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That’s a great point. It does usually take a long time, doesn’t it. Hopefully the media attention will fast-track things in this case. But it probably won’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 21K

    Posts

  • 523K

    Comments