84 points

Guaranteed if original Star Trek came out today, it would be decried as “woke” and “DEI” and there would be outrage over it from the usual culture warriors.

permalink
report
reply
49 points

Okay, I’ve finally looked up what DEI means… Diversity, equity, and inclusion are things people are berated for??

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

It’s not what DEI means. It’s about what it stands for.

Conservatives don’t want to be told to treat people with decency. They want to treat however the fuck they want, and then tell you that you aren’t treating them decently.

It’s about wielding power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

This is what they mean with those “My rights don’t end where your feelings begin” bumper stickers. The only right they’re losing is the right to being a bigoted asshole.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

YES, it’s insane. It’s like saying “be a decent person” and people going “Fuck you, commie bastards, I do what I want.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

From 2020 on we’ve seen that telling people “hey wear the most basic of facemasks when you’re out in public because the morgues are running out of space all over” causes them to start screaming at the Walmart greeters and throwing tantrums like children. We are still stupid apes in a lot of ways

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

DEI is the current iteration of affirmative action, that’s all.

The problem with DEI is that it’s an imperfect solution that only came about because racists and other bigots couldn’t behave themselves. Forcing the hiring of specific demographics isn’t going to result in the best possible outcomes in every case but those groups also need opportunities even though they’ve been systemically given worse educations and have been generally shat upon. Removing race we’d also probably hire the white man more often but not because they’re inately better, but rather because they are simply more likely to be able to afford to have pretty looking resumés compared to disadvantaged minorities.

We wouldn’t need DEI in the first fucking place except people like an old boss, who saw an immigrant classmate of mine’s resumé come up and because of his African last name said “no thanks I want to keep jobs in Canada”, need to be forced to do the right thing. They create the problem and throw temper tantrums when we try to fix it. These people are obstacles and it’s getting tiring.

TL;DR: They feel as if they have a point because DEI can result in a more qualified person being turned away, which I get feels unfair. However, they refuse to acknowledge the fact that said person was only more qualified because we make it so difficult for minorities to fucking do anything. I’m getting so sick of right-wing bullshit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Also, DEI is trying to diversify the points of view in the workplace. Homogeny of thought is NOT better when it comes to problem solving. Varied voices can create amazing solutions to problems one didn’t know really existed. If allowed, it builds creativity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

The outrage the far-right spun over DEI is by trying to portray it as hiring vastly underqualified applicants simply because of their belonging to an underrepresented group (often even being portrayed as vastly underqualified because of their race as white supremacist rhetoric). Of course in reality this wasn’t true and it was just a foghorn for racism/an ethnic slur, but that’s how it started.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

A lot of people seem to use “DEI” as a stand-in for the “n-word.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Same people who couldn’t pronounce “affirmative action” without scare quotes and italics.

“It’s these “Affirmative Action” people…”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

My brother in Christ…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Yeah, I’ve heard it called “Didn’t Earn It” and the idea is that people are given preferential treatment in job or services based on their ethnicity and not their qualification. As with all things the truth is somewhere in the middle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

No, it isn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Counterpoint: As long as they consider the women “hot” they will accept them as part of the franchise.

Nichelle Nichols I think was probably hot enough to not draw their ire.

Those culture warriors are somehow always okay with women they view as “fuckable.” Women only have value in their eyes if they want to sleep with them by their looks alone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Just out of curiosity, what do you think is more progressive: a spaceship where all female crew is forced to wear miniskirts, a bridge crew that has exactly one woman, the part in the pilot where “Orion sex slaves” are introduced in the horniest possible way, or the married producer who was cheating on his wife with the only two relevant female cast members?

The 1960s was a long time ago. While there are a lot of TOS that aged very well, the idea that the show would be decried as woke is straight up delusional.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Cow pies. “Original Star Trek” clearly referred to TOS.

If OC meant a modern rendition of classic trek, they wouldn’t be speaking in hypotheticals. They’d just refer to SNW by name.

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points

Nichelle Nichols was at one point thinking of quitting the show but stayed because MLK Jr. himself told her how important her character was.

permalink
report
reply
42 points

And without Nichelle Nichols on Star Trek, she wouldn’t have been hired by NASA and then we wouldn’t have had Sally Ride, so she is a legitimate space hero.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

She thought about leaving because she didn’t feel like her character got to do enough - a common sentiment of supporting actors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

It was TNG that really established an ensemble cast formula; TOS was Kirk-Spock-McCoy and the rest. It took TNG a couple seasons before they got the idea of a true ensemble cast where everyone gets to star in some episodes. TOS wouldn’t have had more than one episode starring Reginald Barcklay with Geordi and Dianna in supporting roles, but TNG had at least two.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

TOS wouldn’t have had more than one episode starring Reginald Barcklay with Geordi and Dianna in supporting roles, but TNG had at least two.

Three, even. Horny holideck, barkley gets his groove on, and transporter cuddles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

“Shatner figured it out? Shatner? This is a real low point. Yeah, this one hurts.”

permalink
report
reply
29 points
*

“When I have a problem that phasers can’t solve, I just kiss a beautiful alien. Then suddenly, I have a completely different problem!” - Jason Tiberius Kirk

Edit: I may have drifted into the Kelvin timeline…

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

“I’m a legit snack” - Nyota Uhura

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

More like the main course 😏

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

They didn’t have everything figured out back then. For one, they bullied Spock for what we could only describe today as his neurodiversity.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

There will never come a time in which we have everything figured out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Yes but that doesn’t mean we should never look back and see how far we’ve come, just as we look forward and see how far we have to go.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And new people who haven’t figured out yet are born all the time!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

excuse me, i have a degree in bullshit. We have figured out everything. 1+1=2. The rest is left as an exercise for the reader.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

The message I got from McCoy was that humans got along because they found new people to be racist against instead of each other

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

It helps when every other planet is a severely flawed monocolutre.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I think that’s the real message of Star Trek in general!

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

And TOS/ENT in particular

ENT gets bonus points for shran calling humans “pink skins” when Travis is right fucking there on the bridge

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s a simple enough message to even get it from Warhammer 40k - Gender? Skin colour? Disabilities? Doesn’t matter, pick up a Lasrifle and start shooting xenos

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

McCoy called Spock “green-blooded” on multiple occasions - and once a “hobgoblin”. And I would call the Vulcan penchant for logic a cultural trait, not neurodiversity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

And there will be things that are being created today that’s considered progressive that in 20 years, will be considered as missing the mark.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

You should see the episode when a woman body swapped with Kirk, and how the Enterprise crew suspected something was wrong

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The one I always feel like I need to warn people about is the treatment of Rand in The Enemy Within. Particularly since that happens so early in the series.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

McCoy was racist as shit and would not only have been cashiered, he probably would have been charged for hate speech

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

They were even more upfront about it in TOS for some issues too.

I remember many instances where they say “We have women in our crew in the future.” It’s not like DISCO flaunted around saying “we don’t hate gay people in this ship.”

Like I understand that DISCO isn’t everybody’s favorite, and sure it has some issues, but all the flak it got for being “woke” and “preachy” was weird to me.

Part of Kirk’s whole thing was preachy speeches, and Picard had many moments too.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

I quite agree STD wasn’t everyone’s favourite, in any case it wasn’t mine, although I really tried. But whining about it being woke was just stupid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Saying discovery is woke with their crew split in two parts, the queer ones all packed together and then the “normal” ones, seems like a stretch.

The gay couple basically adopts the non binary one who is in a couple with the trans one, are friends with the gay engineer, but barely even talk to the rest of the crew? Ah and sex scenes between straight people but the most the gay couple gets is sitting next to each other, brushing teeth and a small kiss (not that it’s a bad thing on its own, it forced the writing to actually show a relationship and not just a bunch of sex, which is positive)

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That did really bother me, shoehorning all the queer people into their own little box after being far more progressive in previous seasons. Literally anyone else on the crew could have adopted Adira (who I didn’t really care much for as a character anyway, she was basically SNW Uhura but not as good an actor), but they had it be Stamets and Culber. How about making it, say, Detmer?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

How about making it, say, Detmer?

Who? You sort of trailed off there; all I’m seeing is a blank space.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

but the most the gay couple gets is sitting next to each other, brushing teeth and a small kiss

While you’re absolutely right, I think the record should show that tooth brushing scene is one of the sexiest scenes in television history. Those two have some serious on-screen chemistry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Once again, the “don’t show too much gay” policy they seem to have forced them to show a relationship through actual intimacy, in contrast to the usual “relationship=sex” that shows usually have (which we can see with most heterosexual relationships in the same show, for example). Even the doctor that is portrayed by an actor that, let’s say, likes to show his body (most of the google results are him half naked) was not sexualized stupidly like they usually would ; a positive thing, except that it’s probably only because they don’t want to “show the gay” (Book for example is always naked and fucking).

So yeah, taken independently it’s a better relationship image than most relationships in most shows, but in the context it’s pretty horrible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s not like DISCO flaunted around saying “we don’t hate gay people in this ship.”

Well, after DS 9 it would just be repetitive. Also TNG spent a few episodes on this exact point, but it wasn’t a main topic.

But people tend to focus their complains about things being “preachy” when those things put the preach above the story-telling. DISCO absolutely had this flaw in some point or another. Never for very long, though, so it really wasn’t a main characteristic. Anyway, when a show is simply good, almost nobody gets bothered by the preaching.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The only issue disco has ever actually had is their serialized episodes. People hate on the other shit cause they’re bigots. Its still good Trek. The story is just less flexible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I just wish a single ship weren’t saving the Federation/Galaxy/Multiverse every season.

It also waffles hard between “The important part of the Federation is it’s ideals” and “Section 31 is pretty badass right?”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Section 31 is pretty badass, right?

I have to say, I hated that. It feels like C suite “promote our upcoming show” meddling, to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Have yet to see anything outside of DS9 use Section 31 well. It’s inclusion manages to turn what’s supposed to be a hopeful story of the future into just another police procedural that happens to use Star Trek™ branded props

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The single ship thing is annoying and its in Picard, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

it’s still good Trek

Everything with Pike and crew and pretty much everyone except Michael is decent Trek. Deus ex Burnham in every century Starfleet exists in is boring as shit and the nacelles not even being attached to the ship anymore is veering into Star Wars level of nonsensical ship design.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

If floating nacelles is what does it for you but you can accept people being torn apart to the atoms and rebuilt somewhere else Idk what to tell ya bud. The saucers detach and float around, idk how that is sensical as it would create unnecessary weak points in the hull of the ship. The worst parts about discovery were how they were stuck trying to tell grand stories instead of being able to focus on the characters much. They didnt have that tight A plot B plot action that Trek does. But it was far from stinky poo poo terrible like most people say.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

The only issue disco has ever actually had is their serialized episodes.

And not spending enough on light bulbs in some episodes. I wondered if my TV was broken, at one point. Lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t care about the woke nonsense. STD has very few redeeming qualities. Bad writing, bad acting. They spent little to no time flushing out the characters. I guess they didn’t have time what with the universe about to end every 10 minutes. I only watched for Anthony Rapp, Doug Jones and Michelle Yeoh. Everyone else was a stinker or didn’t get enough screen time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Fun fact: Katherine Janeway didn’t attend Starfleet Academy; she was in ROTC at the Samantha Carter School of Character Introduction.

permalink
report
parent
reply

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

!tenforward@lemmy.world

Create post

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally “othering” of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That’s okay! Just don’t let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it’s free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not ‘inspire jamaharon’

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community’s expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be “want to be added to the sidebar?” and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


Community stats

  • 4.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 47K

    Comments