Open source projects create corposhit because the developers working on them work for corporations who pay them to create the corposhit. The fact that they’re open source is just so that the corporation can benefit for free from contributions by developers outside the company. That’s all.
What’s #cat-v?
Considered harmful.
It’s the IRC channel for https://cat-v.org/
There are some very clever people there with very specific ideas and opinions about computing.
I open the site and see:
‘The Internet is not for sissies.’ – Paul Vixie
It’s always important to make a good first impression or whatever.
I think it’s achieving the intended goal of gatekeeping the site to 50+ year-old graybeards with narcissistic tendencies and a persecution complex which have decanted over the decades into a nasty brew of unfiltered bitterness.
Maybe. Got any ideas? 🤷
Clones are also great for publicity and awareness. People are searching for alternatives to (insert program here).
I think there are examples of projects getting criticized for not recreating the corposhit. Take GIMP — sure some folks really like it, but there are huge swaths of people who basically just say, “why doesn’t it work like Photoshop?!” and get very frustrated with its different approach.
Personally, I like Google Photos — the interface, not the product — so when Immich came along and basically cloned it, I was really happy (I think Immich is fantastic, and at this point calling it a Photos clone is kinda offensive tbh — it’s way cool).
Some corposhit just sucks, yeah, but some is actually well thought out — no shame in taking the concept and running with it, IMHO.
I’ve never used either, honestly, so I’m pretty sure I’m not entitled to an opinion, but I do know that every time someone says they ‘use’ or ‘like’ GIMP all I can imagine is the dude from Pulp Fiction going, “Eh, it’s a living!” with a defeated sort-of shrug (a la the wooly mammoth-cum-showerhead from the Flintstones)
I mean, either way, you do you and all, I don’t kink/platform-shame
