For years, Google Maps has been a go-to tool for millions worldwide, seamlessly integrated into search results for instant access to directions, locations, and more. But if you’ve noticed something missing recently, you’re not imagining things. Due to European Union regulations, Google has been forced to remove its Maps functionality from its search results, marking a significant shift in how we interact with the tech giant’s ecosystem.

337 points

Talk about hyperbole…

Google Maps is over!

No, the integration in the search results when searching the web might be gone, but you can still go to https://maps.google.com/ and find what you need.

This is not a significant shift with how we are interacting with Google, it is a minor change.

Calm down.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

Holy shit! Top comment right there! I read the headline and thought “Geez, that’s going to leave a massive hole in the maps market. There is no clear runner to fill that role. That probably means we’ll see a few years of innovations as competitors try their best to come up with that new killer feature that makes their maps the best.”

No.

None of that. Google.com will just act slightly different on their search pages.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*

A hyperbole would be to make a point, an intentional exaggeration for emphasis or generalization.

This is just a lie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Sell your Google stocks now. This is the nail in the coffin!

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

This is not a significant shift with how we are interacting with Google, it is a minor change.

Eh… Most people (Not the tech literate ones) interact with the internet nearly wholly using the Google search bar. To the point where many have NO idea where to put a URL in their phone to actually go straight to a website and often just google the url and click the first link.

For those people, this will be a significant shift.

permalink
report
parent
reply

To underline this statement: Microsoft Bing is trying to spoof Google UI when people search Google.com.
Most tech literates do not understand the workflows of ppl who have no clue. Having done a shitton of 1st Level Tech Support for an ISP in my youth has given me the mostly useless ability to know how the clueless use their computer.

I wish i could forget most of that bullshit tho, it brought me far too young to the conclusion that humanity is a long way from becoming immune to snake oil vendors, scam artists and con men because most people don’t have a fucking clue what they are doing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

“Google maps is over …there! It used to be here, now it’s there. Go click a link or something, like we did in the old days.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Click a link? Oh you young whippersnapper! We used to have a note with written domain names or even IP addresses that we would type in if we wanted to go somewhere online.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’ve had Google Maps added as a search option for years. Because I use Qwant for search, and the maps functionality in Qwant sucks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

It’s cumbersome to change habits if you just wanna search for X but can’t have the shortcut to the location in the results.
Now I need to double search.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

It is but it’s also better for consumers.

Google dominates search by bundling lots of services in one place and destroying all competition. They want you tied in to all their services and to never leave. You ar ethe product and they want to sell every bit of data they can and sell you to advertisers.

The tech giants keep abusing market dominance to dominate new markets. Microsoft bundled Internet Explorer with windiws and destroyed the browser market. Then Google search sites and android aggressively pushes Chrome and now dominates the browser market. Microsoft bundles Teams in Office and destroys Slack; one of many egrarious actions by Microsoft over the years. Apple forces all browsers on iOS to use Safari - so you can’t bypass the Apple app and service marketplace - their 30% cut is too important.

Regulation is needed to break up the domination of these tech monopploes. By separating navigation from search, people get back in the habit of using other services for navigation results.

That might be Google maps, or that might be Bing maps or OpenStreetMaps. But Google can’t use bundling to make consumers too lazy to leave.

It’s a start. A minimal inconvenience for users benefits everyone longer term.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

It could be handled better by forcing Google to offer choices for map providers as they literally already for browsing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I agree, it is a slight annoyance, but that is all it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Or you could switch to another search engine such as Kagi or DuckDuckGo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
88 points

I understand the why of this but this is not an improvement. I suppose search engines should ask you which maps provider you want and then show results based on that.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

I suppose search engines should ask you which maps provider you want and then show results based on that.

Why would they ever enable choice. That’s not very capitalism

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

If they allowed users to select a default, almost everyone would select Google maps and get a better experience. By not giving the user a choice everyone loses, because Google maps is still going to be the top option. I’m surprised that this functionality either doesn’t exist already or isn’t allowed, because capitalism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Some people would not select google though. And google can’t afford people knowing that there’s competitors to Google! So better fuck everyone over by just disabling the integration.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

True. Google is using a monopoly and forcing users to use Google Maps on their platform.

There’s no competition, and everyone is worse of. It’s a long term good change by the EU.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Most browsers allow choice of search provider. If you choose Google, you’d get this, if you choose a different search engine, you’d get a different experience. People already had that choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

almost everyone would select Google maps and get a better experience.

Spoken like someone who’s never used a different map provider!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I suppose search engines should ask you which maps provider you want and then show results based on that.

Google could have done that, but they chose to go this router to inconvenience users, so that they then could blame the EU for this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-25 points

Like… and hear me out… save the preference with some sort of Cookie technology? Do you think the EU would be up for that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

I can’t tell whether you’re being intentionally ironic. Yes the EU would be up for it. The EU didn’t ban cookies. Putting it simply, you do not need a cookie banner if you aren’t tracking people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Im a web dev and I build almost all of my sites without cookie banner unless they’re really required (YouTube embeds, invasive tracking etc) and when I don’t include a banner, people usually think I forgot it.

It’s a shame that most people think the internet just has to be crap now and every site needs some dark pattern banner to track its users.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

To make it even more clear let me rephrase it:

If you want to store sth like that, it would be classified as functional and you wouldn’t even need a cookie banner for it.

Only if you want to use it to track people you need to notify them

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Pretty much. Although I continue to be annoyed this ever even needed to be asked. There’s literally a browser setting to communicate this “do not track”. EU really should’ve just forced everyone to respect it :/.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

If you want to store your map preferences, save the preferences to your account and make sure you’re logged in.

I’m not saying anything like this is preferable or whatever but there’s also little sense in removing all semblance of user experience in favour of removing power from tech giants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

You can literally store all preferences in cookies without a problem with EU legislation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

how is it over? you just type in maps.google.com like you used to type in mapquest.con

permalink
report
reply
6 points

But I still type in maps.google.com already because I don’t use Google search. But I still use maps.

Google maps is the best True dat. Double true.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Used to be, Waze is consistently better at producing faster routes now at least in the UK. I keep meaning to try out others like organic though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Waze is owned by Google now so it basically is maps now just with a different skin and some better features.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I use Waze when that matters but I’m usually using Google maps to look up stuff like what foo places are near me.

I’ll use organic sometimes too when I want directions but I don’t care that much about time.

Edit: food but it’s funny that way too

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Is this news? The “Maps” tab has been missing from my search results for a while here in Germany.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Same in Denmark

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

For users, this tight integration was incredibly convenient.

In Firefox, I have had any search starting with “gm” set up to do a Google Maps search. So “gm Omaha” will go to Omaha.

That is, I create a bookmark that’s aimed at:

https://maps.google.com/maps?q=%25s

and then in the Bookmark Manager, set the keyword to “gm”.

Kagi – which uses bang prefixes to do searches on external sites – appears to have done the same thing on the service side with “!gm”. So “!gm Omaha”. (They normally have their own, OpenStreetMap-based map thing, but if you want to do Google Maps, that’ll do it.)

EDIT: For some reason, the Lemmy Web UI seems determined to convert “%s” to “%25s” in the URL above, and I can’t seem to find an escape sequence that avoids that. It’s intended to just be “%s”.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

I use DuckDuckGo so I use !m.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

%25 is the URL encoding for 0x25 (or 37 decimal), the ASCII code for the percent sign. Basically it seems to recognize that it is a URL and then URL-encode characters that are not allowed in URLs

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Probably it should only do so if the link is actually being hyperlinked which doesn’t happen for blockquoted text, so I guess it’s probably a Lemmy bug.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thanks that’s really useful

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 591K

    Comments