To anyone curious: It’s barely bad enough to even be funny. It’s not a great porn flick. Pretty basic Ron Jeremy, piss poor parody that’s only really interesting because of Nintendo’s actions. There’s also a sequel.
There’s also a fuckton of porn we’ll never see. Supposedly there’s stacks of Disney stuff bored animators have drawn, things for Bethesda titles that never left the office… It’s wild, when you start running down the rabbit hole.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXeTsWGPT0w
Obligatory
And the Lord said unto the as he slid the tablet slyly to Moses “This one, this one’s for you wink wink”
Is that…Bowsette?
I know it can’t be, since the character didn’t exist when this was made, but it’s interesting that her costume looks at least as much like Bowsette’s (and not at all like Peach’s or Pauline’s) as his looks like Mario’s.
It’s probably just ‘Sexy Latex Peach’.
… Which basically is what Bowsette is anyway, in terms of character concept.
What would be a lot more funny would be if this included an anthropomorphized (or not) Birdo, who is basically a pink Yoshi with giant tubular appendage for a face, who wears a bow, and was canonically described as male but ‘thinks he is a girl’ and ‘would rather be called Birdetta’ in the Super Mario 2 manual.
That game came out in 88, could possibly be before this porno lol.
That name always bugged me. “Peachette” was so called because she was a combo of Peach and Toadette. A combo of Peach and Bowser would be “Peachser” or something like that.
Bowsette just sounds better than Peachzer or Bowpeach, that’s why it spread so quickly.
That reminds me of that My Life as a Teenage Robot “parody.”
I’d enjoy seeing a real ideological debate on the ethicality of sexualizing a cartoon teenage robot between intelligent and informed parties and whether or not said robot can even be considered “underaged”. I’m not taking a stance, I just want to watch other people do so
I mean, at the root of it all, you’ve got to ask why paedophilia is wrong in the first place
Is it the individual’s obsession with youth-like appearances or naivety? Not necessarily, as both of those things can fairly easily be emulated in older (legal) individuals
I’d argue it’s wrong simply because of the impact you’re having on the victim. You are effectively giving them ptsd for the rest of their life, destroying any childhood they may have left, even if consensual, as they can hardly be expected to understand what they’re agreeing to
But a robot? Well, I don’t know if this line of thought can even apply to them. On one hand, we don’t know her actual age (I think); she may be entirely legal
On the other, if she can fully emulate a younger teen mind, then how is raping her any different from raping a human?
Can you even consider them equivalent, when you can wipe her entire memory?
Can you even quantify her age?
Questions for later
I’d like to hope everyone agrees it’s wrong. She had “the mind of a teenager” but I think she hadn’t had sentience that long. Maybe someday they’ll make robots take a test to see if they’re ready.
The title of the show literally states that she’s a teenager and people will go “would”
