It’s been nice to see ordinary Americans open up to life in China but everyone is acting blind to their censorship. Makes me thankful for the fediverse and being able to self host my own instance.

1 point

One of the most cringe things I’ve ever read.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Well you’re just rude.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

You should move to China and stop posting in English comms if you feel this way.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I did the moving to China bit almost 24 years ago. I still post in English comms. Weird, that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

the real name of this app in chinese is “Little Red Book”

surprised?

permalink
report
reply
4 points

This is a mistranslation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Of what? It’s called 小红书. Oh I guess that’s more English! Interesting

permalink
report
parent
reply

No, it’s an accurate translation. It just doesn’t mean what people think it means because they don’t know what the Chinese call the so-called “Little Red Book” of Mao’s quotations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

You’re right.

But also if you wanted to be a pedant you could argue that translation is not the mere act of literally converting the words from one language to another, but also concerns considering the cultural contexts of the languages and how best to convey the information such that the closest understanding is achieved. In this case you would want to avoid the linguistic connotation that exists in the target language but not the source language. So one could argue that “rednote” or possibly “red booklet” are maybe the most accurate translations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I can read Chinese. Maoist thought and censoring of Mao should not be connected lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

good point. i think i misunderstood your initial title

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sorry! :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I still don’t understand the title.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

In English, Mao’s book is called the “little red book” but that’s not the case in China. The direct translation of what they call it in China is “red treasure book”. As such, the name of the app only seems like a Mao reference to people who translated xiaohongshu into English.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s interesting. I also see in the app it’s sometimes called 小红薯 lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I’ve noticed a very pro-China shift on Lemmy since Trump became president. Yeah, Trump is awful, but it’s not like that makes China or Russia better. It makes them all bad.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Pro or anti X nation state rhetoric is rarely helpful. I fully agree that blind support of another country just because it’s not the US is just silly. I don’t know what you mean by all bad. How’re you labeling all three of those countries?

Have you been to China? The thing that is affecting so many US users on xiaohongshu is waking up to how many aspects of Chinese daily life and society are actually better than the supposed best country in the world. This has been my experience on my most recent of many times in China. It shocking how many issues and stressors exist in America that don’t in China.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t know what you mean by all bad. How’re you labeling all three of those countries?

Do you have your head under a rock? Over the past few years China has been putting the Uighur people in concentration camps while Russia has been invading and genociding Ukrainians.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

No, China hasn’t. There has been no evidence.

We know how much information should get out of a state with complete control over the flow of information, via Palestine and Ukraine’s respective genocides. Instead of any of that, we have vague, contradictory accusations from Islamic extremists. The uighur people control Xinjiang, and thanks to investment it’s flourishing.

China killed Islamic extremism via education and improving material conditions; that’s not acceptable to the West, so they made up a story.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

No, because I don’t fall for the propaganda. I’ve met one of the NYT reporters on that and their sources were three Ugyhurs and trust me. I’m guessing you don’t speak Chinese and have zero knowledge of it besides MSN?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The westerner that has never been to China and doesn’t speak a word of mandarin is gonna lecture us on China.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

ZENZ ZENZ ZENZ

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

I think to each their own. My wife spent two weeks in China for work, and she’s still traumatized from it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I think to each their own. My wife spent two weeks in China for work, and she’s still traumatized from it.

What

Edit: oh his wife just can’t handle new experiences.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

You definitely need to tell us what happened with your wife. Can’t just write something like that and leave it hanging!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

It shocking how many issues and stressors exist in America that don’t in China.

Youth unemployment, falling birth rates, spotty healthcare infrastructure, bad working conditions

Which ones does China not have?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Great whataboutism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

China is good actually.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

That started well before he became president.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Awwww, you poor thing.

They didn’t see you as a useful idiot so they leveraged their hatred for what you are and banished you.

Leopards are hungry on both sides of the line.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Well yeah, Mao Zedong is kinda like Chinese Muhammad or Chinese Charlemagne (not supporting the guy, but still). Were you not expecting to catch some passionate attention? I mean, I’d also ask that of everyone; China is kind of known for censoring things, like Italians and cheese or Icelanders and their elves, so it’s weird to see people think the equivalent of “I’m going to a flock of crows dressed up as an owl because it’s exercising freeeeeeeedom!”

I don’t “support” that from a Chinese government perspective, as their journey for power and reach, like a lot of territorial groups, involved lots of death and domination over things that couldn’t “ethically” be owned, but from a service owner’s perspective, I mean, if it’s rightfully the child of your own two hands, it’s just your right to ban as you wish.

permalink
report
reply

Casual Conversation

!casualconversation@lemm.ee

Create post

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you’ll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won’t be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There’s a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it’s vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a “controversial” message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a “spammy” message must be applicable to four purple answers before it’s allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it “would be a copyright violation if the info was art” as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar’s Number) or less, it’s considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

Community stats

  • 3.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 719

    Posts

  • 16K

    Comments