105 points

A modest proposal: If a majority of 51,89% for and 48,11% against was enough to push through with Brexit, maybe 55% vs. 30% should also be a clear votum to start talking about a new EU membership.

permalink
report
reply
93 points

The problem isn’t just re-joining the eu. New contracts would be formed that would be far less advantageous for Britain than they previously had. Which would start this whole circus again :(

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

This whole thing was so predictable even to high school me, it’s ridiculous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

I’m one of those morons who thought it was such a sure thing, we’d obviously stay that I was “too busy” to vote. Nothing but regret

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I honestly think that’s very wrong and one of the last brexiteer arguments that still seems to be believed by reasonable people.

Under the old terms, the UK was one of the largest net contributors to the EU. And also one of the countries absorbing the most immigrants. In fact, the exemptions they got were all quite reasonable.

Without the exemptions, the UK would have been an even bigger net contributor and would have had even more immigrants.

Just from pure self-interest, the EU would be foolish to demand more than the old terms. In fact, with smart negotiating, I am sure the UK could get even more exemptions than they used to have.

And we, the EU, know this. The war in Ukraine is expensive af. The UK is already helping above and beyond what we could expect from them. The EU economy isn’t doing all too great either.

The mutual benefits of the UK rejoining will be billions if not trillions of extra economic output on both sides. It would be billions extra budget for the EU.

Why would we drive a hard bargain to squeeze out the Brits?

Friendly terms that make the British politicians look good and that make the UK public feel like winners and which provide direct short term economic benefits are the way to do it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

Unfortunately it is highly unlikely. The EU would not be being punitive in requiring the UK to play by the same rules as everyone else, it would be playing by its own rules and being fair.

They require countries to join the eurozone when ready and they require signing up to the common agricultural policy etc. Member states that did not get to opt out or rebates would not be willing to allow a new member to have those benefits and any country can veto a country joining. It could only be on the same terms as everyone else.

I dont see the UK rejoining for a generation. The Euro, the CAP and immigration remain highly toxic topics in the UK and would derail any attempt to rejoin.

Also leaving the EU has not been as harmful as we thought. Im not saying its been a positive thing but it hasn’t been anywhere as disasterous was being made out on the remain side of the debate. A reduction in growth while the economy is still growing is not being felt by people. Covid also massively muddied the water - some of the side effects of leaving have been attributed in peoples minds to the pandemic instead.

And the biggest issues in the UK - public services and immigration - have little to nothing to do with the EU. So its just not part of the mainstream political discourse 9 years after the vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

Without the exemptions, the UK would have been an even bigger net contributor and would have had even more immigrants.

When a new country joins the union there’s always a grace period where countries can say “freedom of movement doesn’t apply to them, yet”. This is to avoid migration waves while still kinda poor countries catch up in terms of living standards which then reduces migration rates naturally.

The UK never made use of that. Westminster never used the mechanisms the EU gave them to control the flow of immigration. So, kindly, fuck off with your bollocks. This is precisely the kind of thing why the rest of the EU is apprehensive of the UK rejoining. The rest of Europe doesn’t like to play scapegoat for Etonians.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It’s funny how such a small amount of text can fill somebody with so much hope. Thank you stranger for bringing a little light :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Anything above their old terms would send a very bad signal to any EU members. There are arguments to be made anywhere between “same rules as new states” and “old rules all the way”, but more than that means setting the EU up for other states to follow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Still better than being alone

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Nah, it means the UK wouldn’t rejoin. Voters wouldn’t vote for joining the EU if that meant the Euro and the common agricultural policy and so on. The question will not even be asked for a generation as its so toxic and divisve.

The EU needs to stop worrying about the UK and focus on its own problems. If i were still an EU citizen I’d be far more bothered by the behaviour of Hungary, the rise of the AFD in Germany and the chances of Le Pen being French president. The EU doesn’t seem well equipped for those problems. The UK is not the EUs problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

The EU doesn’t even think that much anymore about the UK. And the UK isn’t that important anymore, and they struggle to accept that. Maybe they should focus on getting basic utilities working again for their citizens (like Water and Health) and less about telling everyone how great they are.

If you leave the bigger London Area, most parts of Eastern Europe look more prosperous and advanced

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

This time, however, the right-wing ones are taking place in America and the UK… The exit from the EU has helped the right so much to weaken democracy in the West… then in combination with Trump… the beginning of the trade war… bringing more and more people closer to the right. You mention AfD and Co? Look at how broken and corrupt systems in US and UK are first

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

…maybe the EU citizens should be asked first IF they want the brits to come back in the first place?

and if they do - under what conditions. Don’t forget the fact the Brits really have burned-down the bridges and threw every little bit of bullshit at the EU and several of the coutries, including their leaders. So - if they want to come back, they should think about a way to redeem themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

It’s not about redemption or something like that. EU membership is a process and open to all european countries. If UK wants to join again, we don’t need an apology from the population.

(and, by the way: 2016 was 9 years ago. With a life expectancy of 78 years and a voting age of 18 a bigger part of those who voted for Brexit have already died. No one under 27 was even able to vote. The migrant population also had no vote here)

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I agree.

There is a lot of BS about setting an example and punishing them, but I have not seen anyone who actually knows how the process works say anything remotely like that.

It would also be a massive case of the EU cutting off it’s nose to spite it’s face. That’s just not how the EU rolls.

The normal process of joining has requirements geared towards poor peripheral countries that the UK already meets or exceeds.

The UK can join anytime it wishes and there is even a lot of room to negotiate mutually beneficial terms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Don’t put all people of the UK in the same basket please.

We are stronger if we are united. Vengeance against all for being misled by the brexit liars is not productive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

there’s some truth in your statement.

Then again - looking at Hungary for example, it’s better to leave someone outside if said somebody has clear tendencies of being a troublemaker.

A good relationship is way better than no relationship. But no relationship is ENORMOUSLY better than a toxic relationship. And the UK track record isn’t that great in that regard…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We do, but we need to set an example. You can’t have it look like some club you can just enter and exit just like that. You have got to discourage other countries from trying to leave. Essentially the UK has to come crawling back on their knees and take a bad deal that gets better for them year after year or smth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Its highly unlikely the UK will rejoin any time soon. The requirements for rejoining are much higher than those for leaving.

Rejoining would mean signing up for the Euro, and the common agricultural policy with no rebates - both those things would extremely difficult to get people to vote for here.

And I have to be honest - I did not want to leave the EU but I would not vote to rejoin. Regretting something is not the same as being for the reverse.

Brexit has not been as bad as I thought it would be. I look at the EU and the continued lack of reform and its democratic deficit and I’m kinda glad thats no longer my problem. I wish the EU all the best, but it needs to become more accountable to voters and it needs to find a way to deal with states like Hungary. Plus the rise of far right parties like AFD in Germany and the real risk Le Pen may be the next president of France honestly makes me feel safer out of the EU. How would the EU deal with far right parties in actual power? The democratic checks and balances seem so weak.

I wish the EU the best of luck with these problems. The UK has its own national problems to focus on and I feel like thats finally happening as politicians are no longer obsessing over the EU.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Your mistake: modesty.

The fuckers pushing Brexit were extremely immodest liars.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

If they want to rejoin they should break up and let the individual countries become members. So if England wants to get out again it doesn’t drag Scotland and Northern Ireland with it against their will. Those two countries voted remain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

But … why? That totally not how the EU membership process works?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You’re right, it’s unfair.

Break up Britain first.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Let’s just switch UK with Hungary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Or, let’s punch Orban in the face and have both Hungary and UK as members.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Think it was wrong today leave is different to think they should return

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

My conspiracy hat on, the only reason the right to leave was high was due to Russian interference. Now that their interests are focused elsewhere and they’re being sanctioned to high shit what you’re seeing now is the real results. Britain was never overwhelmingly for Brexit.

That’s my conspiracy anyways.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

That’s not a conspiracy IMO. Dividing the west is on their agenda clear and open.

They stopped because they got what they wanted, the UK left, what are they going to do, leave more :-) ?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Eh. Just because Russia published and distributed books to its governmental members and most useful idiots explicitly calling for a propaganda campaign to decouple the UK from the EU doesn’t mean the propaganda campaign didn’t work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Maybe it’s too early(coffee not started working) but what exactly are you trying to say please?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Since when exatcly was that a secret? Im pretty sure Nigel Farage was bought by russians a long time ago. And im pretty sure he was one of the main reasons brexit happened. Alghtough im not from uk so maybe there was someone more influential internaly in UK.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

A bunch of leavers probably died of covid.

permalink
report
reply
51 points

Hindsight is 20/20.

However in this case, it was furiously obvious that this was gonna happen even before the vote. All you needed was to inform yourself and think a little bit.

And even if you didn’t, James Acaster spelled out the simplest, most obvious and most sensible argument against Brexit ever said.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

If tea wouldn’t convince the British, nothing would

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

I keenly remember how one of the things the Leavers were pushing as a benefit of leaving the EU was to be able to get closer to the US. Oopsie…

Yet another in a long line of bollocks from the Brexiters, swallowed by a large percentage of the British Electorate (not just in the Referendum but even in Parliamentary Elections after it where they repeatedly voted the Leave leaders into Government).

Mind you, as somebody who left the country after that (I was an EU immigrant over there for more than a decade) I still look at Britain as guide for the rest of Europe, since they seem to have been 10 years ahead of most of Europe in their sliding towards Fascism (their version of it is led by millionaire/billionaire posh boys rather than nouveau riche construction magnates like in the US, but it’s still the same kind of ideology)

permalink
report
reply

Europe

!europe@feddit.org

Create post

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don’t overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don’t post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don’t troll nor incite hatred. Don’t look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia’s List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add “/s” when you’re being sarcastic (and don’t use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They’re cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don’t evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don’t show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

Community stats

  • 5K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.7K

    Posts

  • 12K

    Comments