Meta sneakily introduced “Platform Integrity Attestation API” which basically calls home to see whether the user has a valid license to play.

This means that to run apps user has to have online connection to perform an integrity test. Whether it’s only a test on launch or continues call home like Denuvo-like DRMs is not yet clear. This could also mean that modified headsets could fail to pass this test essentially closing down the device for modifications that could damage “platform integrity”. Not all details are clear yet but this doesn’t look good.

Currently it’s optional and up to app developers to enable it.

182 points

No fucking way I’ll consider buying one now.

permalink
report
reply
71 points

My consideration was off the table after Facebook bought Oculus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Or be like me. Get one then Meta buys the company. Z_z

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Bad luck man. I would have bought a rift if Facebook didn’t ruin it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

I always wanted one, but when they made it a requirement to have and link a Facebook account to use it I completely lost interest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

I have one. Not long after I bought it, it became a brick because it forced a software update that forced a Facebook sign in to use it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That requirement has been removed for longer than it was in place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You don’t need a Facebook account. They very quickly removed that requirement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Make a dummy one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They make you send them your id…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

They took that out a while ago, that’s when I picked up the Quest 2. Honestly, it’s the best PCVR headset out there, and this article has nothing to do with PCVR, just their own platform. This won’t affect your ability to pirate PCVR games at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Guess I’ll save up for the Valve one

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

HP reverb g2 is pretty solid

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

It’s discontinued unfortunately, so don’t expect much in the way of support. But it is a great VR headset that you can get on the cheap ATM

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m really not a fan of Windows MR, both because it’s locked to Windows but also because it’s kind of temperamental, but it’s a good headset in terms of resolution at least (and comfort).

Although I will admit it’s not as buggy as it used to be so that’s a plus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Out of curiosity:

I was looking into VR headsets half a year ago and found the PICO 4 interesting as a budget option to try VR.

The Display of the G2 seems to be a lot better but costs an additional 250€. Does it really make the experience that much better and worth the bigger investment if you only want to try it out and fear that the headset will only collect dust after a month or so?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I’m just waiting for the Psvr2 jailbreak. The index is nice, but their choice of display really leaves a lot to be desired. I far preferred even the slightly smeared look of my Odyssey+ to the Index, though the index’s tracking was miles ahead of my Odyssey. PSVR is the best headset on the market, but not worth my time unless it can be used forPCVR.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Or just pay $20 for one of the ones that you stick your phone in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

My phone always overheated with those

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

It seems (seemed) like a pretty good vr headset…just it’s owned by one of the worst companies and I have no interest paying them hundreds for that level of access to my personal information.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

😂😂😂😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
93 points

…and there goes my eagerness to buy the Q3. I loathe drm.

permalink
report
reply
83 points

All the shills promised me and other doubters that something like this would never happen. I’m glad I lost all interest in Oculus the moment Facebook bought them.
Hopefully we’ll see some solid info on the Deckard this year.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Same. And it’s sad because, from what others have said, they are great vr headsets. Hopefully valve nails it with Deckard.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I so wish Facebook dropped Oculus so that someone else would do it properly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Who the fuck are buying shit from google and Facebook? No wonder fucking internet is going to shits

permalink
report
reply
27 points

Google Pixel phones are the only phones compatible with GrapheneOS, so there’s one reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

They’re also easy to unlock and relock the bootloader on

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You can relock the bootloader? Basically “unrooting” the device??

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They’re also absolutely the best phones you can buy, in my opinion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

The quest is amazing. It’s cheap and completely standalone while also giving you the ability to use it with pc vr games.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Cant figure out how to delete my own comment. Ignore me

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If you got a good PC for VR the Quest is great to use. I played HL Alyx on it which was incredible.

But the DRM BS though…at this point the Pico is looking better for standalone use

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

What DRM BS? This article? I’ve explained why it’s a whole bunch of fear mongering. There have been apps and games that require always online long before this api came around.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

So glad I avoid Meta products. I doubt they will be satisfied until they can live sell your data and display ads while you use the product.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Those are two very different things. Advertising giants don’t actually “sell” your data, it’s really not in their best interest, they make money by being the only ones with your data.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

So… they sell, lease, etc either your data or some value added bullshit services or products based on your data for a higher price due to monopoly?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

No, they sell advertment slots to advertisers with promise of higher ad interaction, a promise they can keep because they target those advertisements to users that are more likely to interact with them using user data. User data isn’t sold, leased, whatever you want to call it.

Also, technically not entirely a monopoly because there are quite a few tech giants that operate like this. Oligopoly would be the correct term.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Games

!games@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

Community stats

  • 9.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 4.7K

    Posts

  • 99K

    Comments