Meta sneakily introduced “Platform Integrity Attestation API” which basically calls home to see whether the user has a valid license to play.

This means that to run apps user has to have online connection to perform an integrity test. Whether it’s only a test on launch or continues call home like Denuvo-like DRMs is not yet clear. This could also mean that modified headsets could fail to pass this test essentially closing down the device for modifications that could damage “platform integrity”. Not all details are clear yet but this doesn’t look good.

Currently it’s optional and up to app developers to enable it.

0 points

Boycott Meta regardless of this

permalink
report
reply
2 points

This effectively kills beat saber custom maps, which is a large part of quest users. Currently, the custom maps mod already requires hoops to be jumped through but this is possibly way worse.

permalink
report
reply
-9 points
*

Lolol only if the beat saber devs willing implement the API that prevents sharing. Christ even on here assholes don’t read. It’s a optional API and OP is just socially engineering your rage.

Dance for your master you lazy Muppet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The article you’re replying to literally says that it’s not likely going to be used to stop that in beat Sabre.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Who the fuck are buying shit from google and Facebook? No wonder fucking internet is going to shits

permalink
report
reply
12 points

The quest is amazing. It’s cheap and completely standalone while also giving you the ability to use it with pc vr games.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Cant figure out how to delete my own comment. Ignore me

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If you got a good PC for VR the Quest is great to use. I played HL Alyx on it which was incredible.

But the DRM BS though…at this point the Pico is looking better for standalone use

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

What DRM BS? This article? I’ve explained why it’s a whole bunch of fear mongering. There have been apps and games that require always online long before this api came around.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Google Pixel phones are the only phones compatible with GrapheneOS, so there’s one reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They’re also absolutely the best phones you can buy, in my opinion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

They’re also easy to unlock and relock the bootloader on

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You can relock the bootloader? Basically “unrooting” the device??

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points
*

Liiiiiitle bit of an outrage attempting title.

The API is being added, it’s optional for developers, and the person that is quoted in the article even says that it’s not really going to be used for that.

Also there’s never been anything stopping developers from making their games “always online” to begin with, so this changes nothing.

This is like saying steam requires always online simply because an api exists for online checking drm.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Not a fair comparison to Steam as it allows indefinite-ish offline access as long as you check in once. This new Quest restriction has nothing like this. It’s more similar to DRM systems like Denuvo that call home on startup or during play time. The API also checks device integrity which means access to apps could be disabled for modified devices and Steam does nothing of sort.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

The comparison was that the ability to enforce always online exists in steam, just like it will here. Neither will mandate it.

The ability to do this isn’t only being added now, it’s just that meta have made an api for it that developers can use if they want instead of writing their own.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Honestly I’m not as optimistic as you are. Official API gives implicit permission for DRM. Right now if an APP did this it would be review bombed and suffer backslash. With official API it’ll slowly normalizes DRM and suddenly everything requires online.

Quest is getting more closed with every release - remember when Facebook login was not required? The whole dev ecosystem is getting more complex with every update. This seems like an up-coming trend especially now that Quests main competition will be an extremely closed ecosystem of Apple. This will give Quest permision to basically lock down more.

My bet is that a year in most of the apps will have this DRM though I’d love to be proven wrong. I love my Quest 2 and only use it to draw/sculpt when I travel and that would basically kill the device for me so I might be a bit over protective of my hobby here but it really sucks when you buy a thing and somebody else tells you how to use it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah, but people love finding new reasons to rant about Meta (as if there weren’t enough already)

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

yea, this article is intentionally rage baiting. I hate meta as much as the next guy, but 1) im shocked there wasnt any DRM for their apps already, and b) this just opens an API for apps.

Im just not going to buy games with DRM, same as steam.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

“Meta announces optional API to allow developers to get paid”

It’s painful how much you editorializing the article. You are basically fox news.

permalink
report
reply

Games

!games@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

Community stats

  • 9.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 4.7K

    Posts

  • 99K

    Comments