Summary

House Democrats, led by Rep. Pramila Jayapal, introduced the We the People Amendment to overturn Citizens United, aiming to curb corporate influence in elections.

The constitutional amendment asserts that constitutional rights apply only to individuals, not corporations, and mandates full disclosure of political contributions.

Jayapal cited Elon Musk’s massive campaign spending and subsequent financial gains as proof of the ruling’s harm.

Advocacy groups praised the move, calling it necessary to combat corporate power and dark money in politics, but Republicans have not backed the proposal.

3 points

Dipshits: Dems are just as bad! They don’t want to change the system!

Dems: *prove again they want to change the system*

Dipshits: Oh yeah? Well . . . why didn’t they do it already then?!?!

permalink
report
reply
36 points

Genuinely, why didn’t they? Why didnt they do it when they had both the house and Senate? Are you somehow deluded into thinking this will actually go anywhere with the Republicans holding as much power as they currently are? This is just virtue signaling.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

When did they have the house and the senate? Literally - how many Congressional working days did they have a majority in the House and Senate?

Did you say Zero days? Because that’s the right answer. https://ballotpedia.org/Election_results,_2020:_Control_of_the_U.S._Senate

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

The house and Senate were literally both controlled by the Dems when Citizens United became a law lmfao

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Your link contradicts your point. A 50/50 split with a Democrat tie breaker is a Democrat majority.

Citizen United was decided January 21, 2010. Democrats controlled both House and Senate 2009-2010 and 2021-2022.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Have you heard of the filibuster or the fact that it’s been used by default on almost every piece of legislation for decades?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

See, this is actually a good point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Democrats could have changed the senate rules and killed the filibuster for good.

Stop using the filibuster as an excuse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Both

Sides.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Losing a finger and losing a hand are different things.

Not making excuses for dems but I am sick of this fucking empty headed fucking bill Maher horseshit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Oh NOW Dems want to overturn Citizens United… When they have no more power! 💀🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Fucking useless.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

The last time they could have made a constitutional amendment was when they had a supermajority in 1979. Two decades before Citizens United existed - but, go off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

How many times did republicans try to impeach Biden? How many times does SOPA come back? Or attempts to remove E2EE? They should keep trying on important issues like citizens united.

permalink
report
parent
reply

They will doge this question because they feel the need to simp for a party who would gladly put them into Gitmo if it meant 0.1% gains in polls.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

To be honest, the Dems have been trying to overturn Citizens United since it was decided. It’s just too difficult to amend the Constitution. And only an amendment can overturn CU.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Do the people in these comment sections not grasp how Constitutional amendments work?

It requires two thirds of the Senate. Which Democrats have not had in the past half century.

That is why Democrats didn’t try it when they had a majority. Because it would not work.

People really just want an excuse to blame Democrats for everything.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Maybe if they actually tried to do shit people would give them more power?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Maybe if they tried to pass stuff repeatedly that they knew would fail, and certainly be painted in the majority right-wing mainstream media as incompetence - the swing voters who are largely poorly politically informed (according to polls) would somehow see these failures as reason to vote for them more? I like your optimism there but it runs contrary to history

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

It’s far more complicated than that to get an amendment passed including a route that doesn’t require Congress.

Second, there is value in trying things that will fail. It sends a signal to the citizenry that this isn’t acceptable. This can be a good just as much as it can damage their reputation. In my opinion, the Dems need to rebuild a reputation that is connected to the people in some meaningful way. I don’t get the sense that Democratic leadership see that as the core issue

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We didn’t have 4/5 of state legislatures when we had Congress.

If they don’t get that it isn’t acceptable now, nothing is going to convince them.

I don’t get why failing even more would make the Democratic Party look good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Doing something that resonates with your base and, frankly, most Americans, could help. I can’t help you beyond that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points
*

Wow so brave. \s \s \s

Seriously tho. These people are phony AF. They had 4 years to actually do this. This is just political theater.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Can’t expect much from them when they owe thier position to corporations to. It’s been a dog and pony show for a long time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I mean, they had 14 years didn’t they?

Have they ever tried to pass an ammendment for this?

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 19K

    Posts

  • 525K

    Comments