127 points

Maybe it’s because I’m just very sensitive to these sorts of issues but when somebody fires a black man because they think he’s “woke”, it makes me believe that they didn’t fire him because he was woke. They fired him because he was black.

2nd. Is Trump just out there firing the people that will stand up to him ? If yes, we are in for a world of pain, this may not be how dictators are made, but it’s how they sustain their power 

permalink
report
reply
98 points
*

Is Trump just out there firing the people that will stand up to him ?

How is this even a question? Yes, of course that’s what he’s doing. He’s literally following the playbook right wing think tanks wrote before the election. They’ve stated openly that this is all part of their plan. Purge the government of everyone but loyalists, and then act with impunity because the people whose job is to act as a check on executive power will rubber stamp everything.

God, Americans should be panicking right now and you’re all just sleepwalking into this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

Because a vast majority are fucking idiots. Everyone, with any sense, was yelling into the void between their ears about project 2025. Ads about it were everywhere, too. Stupid Stupid Stupid fucks.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Panicked and panicking, I felt helpless

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Alone, there’s not much you can do. That’s why you need to organize. Find other people and groups to join with. Not only do you have more power as a group, but you have other people so you feel less alone and isolated.

Organize. Resist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

As Tucker Carlson might say “I’m just asking the question “

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

You are not wrong on either. This is exactly how a dictatorship begins. I only hope that the American public can see this for what it is. But I doubt it. Literacy is not a strong point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I’m still hoping that James Bond like character from the British government will take him out for us, but that might just be because I’m in the middle of a James Bond movie marathon

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

And there’s nothing wrong with that. Enjoy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The Iranians wanted to kill him for murdering their general but were waiting on him to lose the election so security would lapse.

Figures.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well, the British did burn Washington DC once before 🤷‍♀️

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I hope it’s Idris Elba. Dude was born to be the next Bond, maybe that’s the real reason he couldn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The issue is I think enough of us want that. A “benevolent” dictator. They are already too lost and I think the only possible education will be difficult, painful, and generational in length.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

My evaluation is that a small percentage of Americans want a dictatorship, and a large percentage don’t but are not aware that the steps are being taken, because they think that the institutions of their government are immutable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

They pronounce “Woke” with the hard R

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Donald Trump has no fucking clue what is going on other than what is being whispered in his ear by the people who are orchastrating this whole thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Exactly why I keep saying in other threads that this problem doesn’t die with Trump. The damage is done, and the whisperers just need a new puppet once Trump kicks the bucket.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

DUH

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points

THESE ARE ALL IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES!

Congress needs to step up and keep filing articles of impeachment. Get the republicans on record defending every criminal act, and then beat them in the midterms.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

Congress is controlled by the same party as the president. Why the fuck would they even introduce impeachment articles?

The only way out of this is through means that cannot be mentioned due to this .world instance rules.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

At the very least to signal that they think it is wrong. To make the Republicans go on record saying they condone it.

And not only that, make everything they are doing in Congress just that much harder. Those small sabotage of the other harmful work they are doing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

Impeachment? Midterms? Those words are meaningless now. The system has been broken and dismantled. You can’t vote your way out of fascism. The fight needs to be fought on every front, including those ones, but they will not save you.

The only way out is for the population to rise up in mass protest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think well get 4 impeachments for Trump over his next 8 years in office. They’ll probably all fail

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

All the top officers have been in the military for over 20 years. They have seen Presidents come and go, and are loyal to their fellow service people. Even if they like Trump, firing for political reasons isn’t going to go down well.

permalink
report
reply
35 points

Genuinely, I do think the only way out of this is starting to look like a military coup by some sort of cadre of non-insane officers from across the services. Based on the performance and reactions of every single part of the government - specifically including the alphabet agencies - I don’t think we’re going to snap out of fascism any other way.

It looks like the legislative and judicial branches, and all of the agencies, have simply decided to do nothing and follow the rules while Trump just gives illegal directives that are then enacted by eel-on-musk’s imbecile intern wünderkinds, and everyone just stands around saying “I’m just following orders”. It’s fucking embarrassing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Trump is going after senior military officers AND Social Security AND doing an end run around Congress all at once. I just hope that he doesn’t have enough fingers for the dike.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

I hope the dykes have enough fingers for triggers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Problem is I don’t see any person in military doing this. They’re been brainwashed to love their country and their president since birth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

and their president

During training we are very specifically taught that nothing is above the constitution, including the president. We are obligated to refuse illegal orders.

If it stuck with me, hopefully it stuck with a few of the people still in service.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I have zero special knowledge, but generic history would suggest that at least some in the officer class, regardless of political leaning, will not be down with the current trajectory.

no idea what this may look like, but my worthless analysis portends something brewing ahead and it may be wise to consider possibilities and prep accordingly. fuck these “interesting times”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Well, yeah. When you’re planning a military coup against a fascist regime you don’t announce it ahead of time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Even independent LGBT orgs have immediately given up on supporting trans people, just from the threat of the loss of federal funding. It’s sickening

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

I don’t want to destroy any illusions, but I don’t believe that much resistance can be expected from the military. The command principle applies here and the president is the Commander-in-Chief. I don’t see why any civil disobedience could be expected here in particular. Besides, it’s not as if those who actually make up the majority of soldiers would have much say in military affairs. If that were the case, there might be a chance, but the military is also run by old, greedy, white men - just like any other US institution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

They’re not going to necessarily be the saviors of democracy but there’s actually a pretty clear demarcation between career politicians and career soldiers. There’s a reason “oblivious politician forces military to make strategic blunder” is a trope.

Usually their goals align with maintaining US hegemony but much less so when the Commander in Chief is selling the nation to foreign adversaries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

But like DEI. Meritocracy, and other things Fox News told me

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points
*

That’s nice, we can set it beside the “Thursday night massacre” of the DoJ that happened last week. Only slightly higher, so we get a nice two-level effect with a path going down the middle and HOLY FUCKING SHITBALLS WHY AREN’T THERE MILLIONS OF US RIOTING IN THE STREETS RIGHT NOW‽‽

permalink
report
reply
37 points

About 97% of my coworkers have no idea any of this is even happening. I’d imagine the majority of the US public has no clue what is happening.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Because Muricans are sheep dressed in chicken hawk costumes

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Would be helpful to people who currently don’t know, and to people in the future, if you link to the Thursday night massacre of the doj, Google only showed me articles talking about the Friday one

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

need a leader

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You know why we aren’t rioting…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well, my algorithm says everything is peachy

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Sounds like all these people need to get together and lead armed forces in an uprising and coup the president…

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Or elect a Congress that will remove him

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Sure but I feel way more satisfaction watching him destroyed in some manner

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 19K

    Posts

  • 525K

    Comments