“Trumpism is not going to be defeated by inside-the-Beltway politicians,” he said.

-1 points

He’s also an 83 year old white man, and we learned with Biden that the democrats don’t like that.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

I don’t think he has a huge base of people asking him to run for president again. Even being a Bernie bro, I know his chance for that passed back in 2020. Hopefully, we as a society will be ready for the next person who takes up the fight.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Between the two, I like Sanders more…but I want to see AOC on the ballot, not him. And I won’t pretend it’s not ageism - I am so tired of old people running the country.

If AOC was president, Sanders would surely get an important role and continue to do great work. The presidency is a LOT of work, it ages you fast.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I agree. I think the AOC/Trump split ticket proves she has more appeal than we thought. Or at least more than I thought. I suppose I shouldn’t underestimate the power of the change candidate when the system is this broken.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Oh look. Age suddenly matters again now that we’re talking about an old progressive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Biden won because he wasn’t progressive in the slightest. It’s a sad truth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Biden was handed the 2020 primaries for that reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

If you can’t see the cognitive differences between these two then… You might be Joe Biden.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, but where will he be in 4 years? Age only goes one way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The point was it was less about democrats having an issue with age and more cognitive decline. If Biden seemed more cogent during the election then I doubt Kamala would have replaced him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Age is just one of so many things the DNC needs to focus and do better on when running candidates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

Bernie has been mobilized to do what he always does: re-direct activist energy into the Democratic Party so they can snuff it out (and bring in donations).

He is actively working against progress, while pretending to work for it.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Ascribing malice to Bernie is a very dubious (read: wrong) claim, but unfortunately in terms of results that’s basically what’s happening. Working within the two-party system is never going to produce material results.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Then you should look up footage of how Bernie treats people to his left, and attacks activists for asking him why he’s not keeping his promises.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Can you give me an example?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

the problem with ascribing ignorance over malice is that for all intents and purposes when it comes to politics, the effects are still the same

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

This dude is 100% right.

It may not be why Bernie does it but it’s why they allow him to exist. He is a pressure release valve so people angry enough to do something can follow him instead of Luigi.

Then, when the primaries are rigged against him the DNC leadership can say look, you lost fair and square! voters don’t want progress and continue serving the rich.

Meanwhile, liberals, progressives, leftists, and everything not pro fascists blame each other for losing an election that was stolen.

https://electiontruthalliance.org/clark-county%2C-nv

https://www.kkoh.com/2025/01/21/nv-sos-launches-investigations-into-election-fraud/

Around 3/4ths of theft in this country is wage theft by corporations that will never be punished. They steal trillions from us while we would be jailed for a loaf of bread in some jurisdictions.

Inflation paired with wage suppression is class warfare in a battle of attrition. Liberals that refuse to raise taxes on corporations or wages for workers just legitimize exploitation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The perma stun proceeds as planned

permalink
report
reply
5 points

well that is Bernie’s role.
Act the part full of piss and vinegar and eventually tell you to vote for the fimal corporate dem.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Don’t get mad at Bernie because the people won’t act. He can say the most correct, moral and ethical things imaginable; it doesn’t mean shit until people stand up and fight for it.

And since we’re considering roles, what’s yours? To piss on any and every semblance of progress because it doesn’t meet your exact moral criteria? lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Bernie did not have to capitulate. But he did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Come on, he’s almost gone. I admire him, but it’s sad to watch.

permalink
report
reply

Progressive Politics

!progressivepolitics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

Community stats

  • 5.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 933

    Posts

  • 3.5K

    Comments

Community moderators