Summary

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky says he remains “ready to sign” a US-Ukraine minerals deal despite leaving the White House without an agreement following a contentious meeting with Trump.

Speaking in London after a European leaders’ summit, Zelensky emphasized that their fractious meeting only benefited Putin.

Refusing to discuss territorial concessions, he stated the “best security guarantees are a strong Ukrainian army.”

Responding to calls from Senator Graham that he resign, Zelensky quipped he is “exchangeable for NATO” membership, saying this would mean he had “fulfilled my mission.”

109 points

Remember when Ukraine made a deal to give up it’s nuclear weapons in exchange for security? pepperidge farm remembers.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Thanks for posting a source 😁

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Remember when the Arabs revolted against the ottomans for independence. PepperRidge farm remembers all western lies

permalink
report
parent
reply
94 points

Yeah, Zelensky was never against a mineral deal. His whole reason of not signing was because the US doesn’t want to give Ukraine assurances for where Russia breaks the peace treaty again.

Quite literally what Trump is trying to do is muscle the wealth of Ukraine away from them and leave them with nothing. If Zelensky agrees to that, thousands of Ukrainians will have died for nothing.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

I wish i could upvote you more than once!

permalink
report
parent
reply
73 points

I’m still at a loss what Ukraine would get out of this deal. It’s not weapons

permalink
report
reply
69 points

The goal is US security guarantees, as in US military enforcing any ceasefire agreement with Russia.

I don’t think that guarantee is worth the paper it is written on as long as Trump is in office, but that is the goal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Any long-term agreement with any US administration is not worth anything.

This is not even purely a Trump thing. We saw this with the Budapest Memorandum.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Taiwan is silently but furiously preparing for us to not help in the event of a Chinese invasion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

However the deal doesn’t contain security guarantees, which Zelensky was complaining about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points
*

I think it’s really clever actually:

Zelensky knows Trump secretly - although less and less secretly - roots for Putin. He pretends to offer this deal to save face, but he really doesn’t want to provide any aid to Ukraine, which is probably why he and the couch fucker were so quick to get ill-tampered and call off the negotiations at the White House on Friday: the last thing they want is to find themselves in a position to have to help Ukraine against Putin.

Zelensky is calling them on their bluff and cornering them: either they don’t sign a deal after all and Trump’s duplicitous dealings will be exposed for all to see, or they do sign a deal and Trump will have to kill Russians in Ukraine, which is bad news for his relationship with Putin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

That could be what comes out of it, but I just fear that they sign the papers, companies buy up the land to have rights to mine those minerals and then they wait until Russia wins. Cause if Trump and Putin are buddies, then they could still have those mineral rights after the war in the worst case scenario.

I can’t believe that we’re talking about scenarios like this when it comes to the USA and supporting Ukraine. Urgh…

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I have to say, I knew I wasn’t quite old enough to make it to my grave without seeing the beginning of WW3, but the last thing I expected is that it would come from the US turning into a raging fascist dictatorship.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’re forgetting a key part here. Ukraine wouldn’t be signing away it’s sovereignty. If the help doesn’t materialize then the mineral wealth doesn’t have to materialize either

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The fake plan is that US businesses would be in Ukraine processing the minerals and that would be a deterrent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

In theory that’s not too far fetched. But they are already American companies operating in Ukraine and that has never stopped Russia from bombing Ukraine. I doubt it works as a deterrent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Even weapons would be worthless. All US weapons systems have remote kill switches.

They said that a US administration could put restrictions on kit (read equipment) from the US and that if countries are “deemed not to be doing what you are told you will suddenly find out missiles won’t fire and planes won’t fly. You have got to be careful.”

https://xcancel.com/prestonstew_/status/1895160295032598549

This is a typical “anonymous sources say” type article, but its believable and in line with industry standards even for less critical equipment like trucks and tractors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

We need to drop the f-35s, get something european

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We already have, the French rafale is pretty good. They just aren’t made in sufficient numbers and you can’t ramp that up in a week

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The F-35 isn’t likely to have this problem as it’s a joint project. Any kill switch software would be evident to the project members.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

US would be forced to defend their mining assets/investments in the area.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It it was a fair deal, investment from the US to build more infrastructures, doubling their investment capacity to mine stuff.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

Any deal with the current US administration isn’t worth the paper it’s written on.

permalink
report
reply
51 points

He totally should agree to whatever, and just reneg on the deal once he gets what he wants. It’s what Trump would do anyways, fuck any actual “deal” you have with dishonorable people.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Remember in diablo II when you had to drop the item of the floor to trade and people waited for the other one to drop the item first then steal the item? That’s geopolitics in a nutshell lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That was Diablo 1. In Diablo II they had the trade window.

And besides, you don’t just drop it right next to them! You both drop your stuff a screen apart and then walk past each other to pick it up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I disagree. Democrats would likely take advantage of the agreement if they win the next election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

We don’t make deals with fascist states, we will take advantage of them if the opportunity arises.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s the beauty, it’s not just laying there. If security stops, mining stops. Make them pay for everything to setup in that deposit right between Donsk and Mariupol. Make the foreigners take all the risk and if they get bombed, they should have made a better deal.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 330K

    Comments