He said speaking up during the address was the best way “get across to a person who uses his incivility, who uses his incivility against our civility.”

15 points

Only democrat there with a spine. Hope the rest get replaced

permalink
report
reply
64 points

Did Margie get ejected when she was behaving like a braying walrus? I didn’t see anything suggesting that she was kicked out at the time.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

She is a POS indeed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

That bitch so damn ugly dawg

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

More of this.

permalink
report
reply
73 points

The only Dem who wasn’t a coward. Either walk out with him or talk shit back to Trump instead just sitting there in pink outfits.

permalink
report
reply
256 points
*

Why didn’t every Democrat step forward and PHYSICALLY bar him from being removed. They just sat there and let him be ejected. STAND THE FUCK UP

permalink
report
reply
140 points

I thought the same thing. Then I thought about how powerful of a visual it would have been for each one of them, in turn, to cause a disruption and be escorted out. Let the cameras pan over a half filled chamber after 2 hours of meticulous protesting. That image would be in history books 100 years from now, assuming we all survive the next 4.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Trump is an old fart. He’s not going to stand up there for 6 hours speaking. If, one-by-one, every Democrat made a scene and got walked out they would’ve been there until midnight and Trump having gotten through almost none of his speech.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

they all dont want to be there, they just want to ride on the grift the gop started, and benfitting from the same donors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
81 points

But that would have put their corporate donations in jeopardy!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.

  • Benito Mussolini
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

thats exactly that, with Klabauchers just staring at her phone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Won’t someone think of the corporate donors!

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Sir, this is a retirement home congress. They might break a hip.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

Because they’re weaker than wet tissue paper.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

True, unless it comes to fighting progressives in their own party. Then they suddenly remember how to fight.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Not saying I disagree with your premise.

However, there are some strange brew rules that come into play depending on the #of reps in attendance in the house. You dwindle the dem #s enough and you end up allowing the reps the ability to run amok with the kinds of legislation they’re salivating to pass.

I’m sure this was at top of mind for some of the folks in attendance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Congressional rules are meaningless. They are not the constitution. If the Democrats are going to just sit idle because of “congressional rules” then they might as well start using the constitution as toilet paper

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

You dwindle the dem #s enough and you end up allowing the reps the ability to run amok with the kinds of legislation they’re salivating to pass.

That’s why there’s also quorum rules. There has to be a minimum of X% of the congresspeople present for anything to count and I’m 99.9% certain that all of the Dems leaving would bring the number present under that even if every single Republican was present.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Quorum is largely meaningless in Congress, both houses assume they have quorum at all times. This allows for the pro forma sessions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

First you have to call a meeting to order, you can’t do that without quorum

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I kept waiting for it! For a moment, I had a swell of hope that they were going to force the Sargeant at Arms to remove them one by one, or else block Al from being removed, something, anything with a little fucking Chutzpah, but nope. They all just sat down, shut up, and waved their stupid little signs. Good job guys, I can’t wait to see your next fundraising text.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

It reminded me, very randomly, of quote from a book about urban design and how architectural ideas are introduced and accepted by the public… or not.

From this the “principle of the second man” can be formulated: it is the second man who determines whether the creation of the first man will be carried forward or destroyed…

It was a golden chance and a room full of cowards let it slip.


The book is Design of Cities by Edmund Bacon for anyone interested.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Democrats are spineless cowards and/or complicit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

people who criticize dems from their sofa are the secret spinless trump supporters

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

How’s that party whip taste? Sounds like you’d do well in an authoritarian one-party state as long as the party pretends to be in partial agreement with you.

I hear Shanghai is lovely this time of year…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Is there a better representation of the american people who couldn’t be bothered voting in the first place??

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Even when they do something they’ll get criticized.

Every. Single. Time.

Nothing will ever be enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Are you blind? Or just intentionally dense. We are here, in this thread LITERALLY praising Al Green, a democrat, for DOING SOMETHING

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*

I mean, the OP comment I’m responding to is questioning why every other Dem didn’t do the same so…are you just intentionally dense or…?

Hence the part about “it won’t ever be enough.”

Try reading before typing next time.

Edit- down vote all you want. You know I’m right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*

Even AOC sat quietly? Why wasn’t she fucking protesting?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

She wasn’t there apparently?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well that disappointing in itself. She should been there protesting and making our voices heard.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

AOC talks a big game, but I’m not personally convinced she follows through.

Case in point, this situation. There should have been more democrats doing the same thing.

Why didn’t anyone do anything? They talk a big game on social media, but that’s it.

I’m thinking they are either controlled opposition or too enthralled to corporate donations to do anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Think what you will of the approach given this more disruptive option but she wasn’t quietly sitting, she outright refused to attend https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/03/04/aoc-not-attend-trump-address-to-congress-tuesday/81398760007/

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

If the rest of her party didn’t commit to it I don’t think she should have. Seeing one empty seat doesn’t have the same effect as walking or being escorted out. Al was the only one doing anything near what should be done on the daily.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

another armchair general calling for the dems to arm themselves and perform a revolution or else they’re nazi sympathizers

this is what civil politics in a non banana republic looks like

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

No dumb fuck. You ever read a history book? Congress used to have literal fist fights.

Defending yourselves from being ejected from your literal work place, a place YOUR constituents elected you to be at, by someone who is by not a single ounce of the definition, your boss, is not violence. It is not “arming” yourself, IT IS LITERALLY DOING WHAT YOUR OATH OF OFFICE STATES, TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED FUCKING STATES

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

no need to shout i’m right here. i imagine you prefer to settle most things with your fists. specially politics

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is very not what civil politics look like unless of course one loves the taste of boot. Mmm boots.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

so if we’re playing cliche battle are you the heroic revolutionary?

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 19K

    Posts

  • 535K

    Comments