I run a moderatly successful Subreddit (~200.000 subscribers), but I want to stop. I have no interest in moderating it anymore, but Reddit as a company has totally made it clear that it is viewing subreddits as its own property:
- As far as I know I can’t take a subreddit of this size private anymore
- If I just stop moderating, people still can post and will post problematic content that I don’t want to see online
- If i stop moderating, somebody else can “claim” the sub and will be the new moderator, which I also don’t want
Does anybody here have experience in stopping a subreddit that doesn’t lead to Reddit just placing new people in control? I’ve already removed the option for the sub to be recommended to users and for it to be shown in “high traffic feeds” (which always led to nazi showing up btw), but I also was thinking about a way to restrict who can post or to set extreme high karma requirements for posts. Or are there any other options?
I would not advise destroying a community like that. I think that would be a waste. So many people are destroying data, knowledge and human alliances, just because they lives on a website that went shitty.
I live in a shitty country. I left the country where I was born because it was shitty, and now I live in a different shitty country. Every computer I have access to has shitty software on it. The internet infrastructure is provided by shitty companies. My food is grown out of shit, and my shit is recycled by shitheads. The universe is a toilet. So what now?
Maybe give your community to someone who cares about it, while promoting an alternative that you care about.
I dislike Reddit too, but why would you want to ruin a subreddit just because you want to stop? What’s the problem with finding new mods? This logic seems similar to Reddit’s by thinking it’s your property, when it should be the community’s
Doesn’t this seem morally flawed? You moderate a sub, but don’t want to do it anymore and you can’t stand the thought of someone else doing it so you want to just ruin and destroy it? That sounds awful. No, the sub doesn’t belong to you and it doesn’t belong to Reddit either. It belongs to the members because they’re the community. I can’t even comprehend why you feel like it’s something that belongs to you. You moderate as a service to that community, not because you own it. When a pastor retires, they don’t burn down the church they preached in. That church belongs to the people and the pastor was its servant, not its owner.
Yes and no. First of all, there is nobody who wants to take over. So the option is “abandon it” vs. “kill it”. Reddits actions in regard of their mods do have consequences. And it also doesn’t belong to the community as Reddit is actively claiming ownership. So to take your church analogy: The pastor wants to quit. The bishop claims ownership and control of everything, is actively harming the community, but can’t provide a replacement priest.
And in my opinion it is better to stop projects like this instead of abandoning them as abandoned places & subreddits will get taken over by spammers, crazy people and full on nazis.
The simple answer is I don’t think you shoul. if there is a community that is so big, even if you’re a moderator that doesn’t give you the right to kill the community.
If in your opinion this community is harmful and violates the rules of reddit you can report it. But for anything else if you don’t want to be a part of it, Just don’t be a part of it.
If you would like this community to also exist in Lemmy, open a community in Lemmy, moderate it and pin it in the subreddit. But at the end of the day, it is not your place to decide if a community should exist or not, even if you personally invested a lot of time moderating it.
Eh, if they started and built that community, it’s theirs imo. They put in all the work and time to make the community and reddit reaps the benefits on their unpaid labor. Burn it down if they want.
Sorry but they signed up for it. Reddit never claims that by moderation you gain ownership. He didn’t host the community, he moderated it.
The only reason someone should be allowed to kill a community is of they are the ones hosting it (in which case they should be allowed to decide what they want to host) or if the community is harmful.
It would be like someone who decided to go everyday to the park and clean the benches, would one day decide that he is done cleaning them, so he just tajes them home. They are not his benches, they are not on his property. His contributions are great but they do not entitle him any ownership.
I see qhat you’re saying but I don’t agree. First, a park exists in a place. You can’t go to a park and just add to it like you do a digital space. And deleting the digital space you created returns things to how they were before you made changes.
Saying it belongs to the host is not a great argument either. When you make an account on Facebook or any other social media site you don’t lose control of your photos and words. Those are yours. And to continue on that path, a community created in Facebook can be deleted by the person who made it, because that community is theirs.
Sell it. There are websites for it
