187 points
*

TL;DR, the AG asked for a bench trial, Trump’s defense team didn’t respond, and so Trump gets a bench trial. It’s possible that a jury trial would have been disallowed in this particular case under New York law, but the defense didn’t even bother to ask.

Whelp, that’s on your people, Donald. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

permalink
report
reply
75 points

You know you messed up when you run through so many good lawyers that the only people who are still willing to defend you are total goofballs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

My understanding is, with possibly one or two short term exceptions, he hasn’t even had mediocre attorneys for years now. None of the big firms have wanted anything to do with him since before he was president.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

There was a good LegalEagle video the other day where he ranked all of Trumps lawyers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lhy5Y8xVHS0

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Trump is going to be calling public defenders. Better call Saul.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Call Jacob, and Ronnie🎶!

(Sorry, only folks in Los Angeles will get that. But that’s a lot of folks.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

“The Best People.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

AKA racists

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Well, who wants to work for a known rapist and fraudster?

People who don’t give a fuck about the law, that’s who.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

How deeply satisfying

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

This is just so he can claim, later down the line, that it wasn’t fair because it was just one judge and not a jury blah blah

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Like a jury would prevent him from claiming bias… He already has ranted against juries and grand juries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

When you never pay your bills, you get what you pay for. Crap.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Is there an advantage is not requesting a jury for Drumps side?

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Nope.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

If Trump appointed the judge or can otherwise influence them yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
87 points

Not even remotely. Since there’s no jury, only the judge will be deciding - and this is the judge that Trump has been publicly talking shit about for months. Presumably, he only did that because he thought the case would be in the hands of a jury anyway, so it didn’t matter as much if he antagonized the judge. Whoops.

For him, it’s the worst possible scenario. For us, it’s highly amusing!

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

Presumably, he only did that because he thought the case would be in the hands of a jury anyway, so it didn’t matter as much if he antagonized the judge. Whoops.

You’re giving him too much credit. When analyzing his behavior, it always helps to think like a first grader. The judge was mean to him, so he’s being meaner back. It’s as simple as that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Ha! You’re probably right!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points
*

Yea I too like to infantilize people I dislike, this makes me feel super smug and superior. Wait what do you mean the stupid poopy head became president?

The dumbest thing you can do is underestimate your enemies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think this is likely no useful at best. For the average person, who cares, but anyone who actually wants to be predictive or cautious, it’s probably harmful. I think it’s much more likely that this is a political tool because he knows he lost already. He convinces how bad the judge is to people and then leaves the decision to the judge, which if you believe they’re incompetent then that decision is now in question. He needs the presidency to save himself, not to convince people of stuff that obviously not true.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

He knows hes screwed in every case hes facing. He intends to completely shit the bed in every case since he cant win anyway, claim ineffective counsel on appeal hopefully with judges he appointed. If this doesnt work it goes to his stacked supreme court. He already had an attorney in another case say he would be ineffective counsel in advance of the court proceedings (completely unprecedented) which kinda gave up their game plan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Seems like I’ve already read of several cases that went against him under judges he appointed. At this point I’m not even sure if the chuckleheads in the supreme court could be swayed in his favor. Considering how certain he is that everybody loves him, it’s not surprising that he thinks there’s only a very small minority of people on a witchhunt to get him. His ego couldn’t handle learning that millions of people would happily drop him on his ass if they saw him in the street.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Hoping youre correct

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

As I recently learned, you can’t appeal on the basis of ineffective counsel in a civil case. Which this one is. That rationale for appeal is for criminal cases only.

So if he planned to do that here, well… it’s not going to work out so well for him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

💀

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Alina Hahaha forgot to tick a box. Only the finest lawyers for trump.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Lmao at his female lawyers face. She looks like a deer in headlights.

permalink
report
reply

United States | News & Politics

!usa@lemmy.ml

Create post

Community stats

  • 4.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 4.2K

    Posts

  • 26K

    Comments