253 points
*

So on one hand they’re cluttering user feeds with the spammiest, scammiest ads they can and on the other hand they’re rolling out paid subscriptions to remove ads.

Cause a problem; sell the solution. Transparent scumbags.

permalink
report
reply
59 points

Didn’t they also remove some of the things that indicated a post was “sponsored” or whatever?

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

Pretty sure that’s illegal under EU law

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Something being illegal under EU law is used as an ace in the hole for some reason. These multi-billion companies will pay the fines in the EU and continue operating. On the off chance they roll back these changes in the EU, they’ll keep using them in the US, China, Russia, wherever.

Only thing that’ll stop this is global laws against it, which is impossible because of bribery. Oh sorry, lobbying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

Yes, though it was unclear if that was a feature or a bug. Since their dev team was decimated, the site has been struggling to even do basic maintenance and security updates. It’s entirely possible that was a bug, especially since it only appeared to be happening with certain users and servers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I remember when Circuit City fired the employees that were costing them the most money. https://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Lessons-in-how-Circuit-City-s-job-cuts-backfired-3298517.php

They eventually went bankrupt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

The author of the article determined that these ads are coming from the trashy ad networks that brought you such classic clickbait ads as “Doctors hate this one weird trick” and “[Current President] has slashed auto insurance rates in [your state], here’s how” that you see at the bottom of low quality news articles. So, it’s not just that X has spam ads, but they aren’t even directly selling them, which the article summarizes is a sign of desperation to get any ads, no matter how shit in quality, no matter how low paying to X they are, on the platform. At least the low tier news sites have the decency to identify them as ads and label the ad networks that is putting them up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well on our way to All-Despising Baby Skull

permalink
report
parent
reply
-63 points
*

I despise Twitter’s leadership as much as the rest, but increasing ads is not at all a “cause a problem” situation Twitter doesn’t owe you ad-free usage of their platform. So no, not a scam/scummy behaviour, just bad value.

And you don’t owe Twitter your patronage. So just move on from it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points
*

You do realize that the actual issue is that this is kind of thing is going to be normalized, so that it can spread like a plague across the corporate-touched internet, objectively making the entire thing as a whole objectively worse… right?

Because it sure doesn’t seem like it with that reply.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

Reddit is already following in footsteps of twitter. unsurprising but worrying because they could influence other companies to do the same

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

increasing ads is not at all a “cause a problem” situation

Tech executives would disagree with you - creating a problem that users have to buy their way out of is one of the most popular business models going at the moment. The mobile gaming industry, for example, is basically $140B worth of intentionally created frustration.

There’s been so much written about this obviously scummy practice. It’s everywhere.

It’s either naive or disingenuous to suggest they’re not obviously trying to annoy cash out of people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

It’s my bandwidth. If I don’t want to use it to download ads, I don’t have to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

They are allowed to try and monetize in various ways, but there are still ethical standards that are just consistently not followed in online advertising (like doing due-diligence to make sure the company advertising isn’t some sort of transparent scam). But this change seems to be stepping away from one of the standards that is actually a legal mandate, properly labeling adverts and sponsored content as such.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Even if X wasn’t trying to make a profit. They still have cost to cover.

I don’t use it. Never have. Never saw any value in it.

I still have yet to understand Elon’s strategy with it but it’s his billions to waste.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

It’s actually not his billions. He borrowed billions to finance the purchase. There are talks of the banks stepping in to protect their investment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
128 points

The easiest way to block these ads is to stop using X.

permalink
report
reply
37 points

It’s a simple spell, but quite unbreakable

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

And yet, my friends keep linking me to X.com even though I told them not to send me porn unless it’s really really good!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

No porn could be good enough to get me on twitter

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
106 points

How much would it cost to show 2girls1cup as umskipable ad to musk fanboys? Asking for a friend…

permalink
report
reply
11 points

That would be…

… priceles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
96 points

the new ad format also doesn’t disclose … that it is even an advertisement at all.

Well, that’s clearly illegal in most places. Ads have to be somehow identifyable as ads, because of misinformation (ads lie, who thought?). Just wait for the court case.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

Im starting to think that is their game, doing whatever is illegal until caught by a court of law, and then find ways to do it without getting caught.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Or the fine is so small it’s just a “cost of doing business”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well they clearly aren’t normal posts, so I guess they’re obviously ads?

Also Twitter is one man who hates laws now, so most places might need to see about enforcing that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
81 points
*

It blows my mind that there are people dumb enough to remain on that shit platform. There’s no excuses. If you remain, you’re in support of that trash.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

You preaching to the choir buddy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

that’s lemmys specialty

the linux bros have to talk to the choir nobody else wants to talk to them

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Many people will cry about Musk ruining the only place on the internet to get news and stay current

Like give me a fucking break lol, that was never the case and it sure as hell ain’t the case now. These morons are so sure he bought it just to kill it, as if that’s some great loss.

Fucking losers, it’s a shit slice of social media, walk away ffs. Twitter is not now nor has ever been special.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Twitter was absolutely special when it came out. It was the first (or at the very least first successful) social media designed for mobile use. It also had large effects on how people thought about and used social media, and had big impacts on the ways various companies and people interact on social media.

I’ve never particularly cared about twitter personally, I used it a handful of times here and there, and I agree that currently and for a while it’s been a pretty shit slice of social media. But saying it was never special is a stretch at best.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Where do I go for hyperlocal updates from advocates in my area in subjects I’m engaged in? How do I get the word out about the projects I’m working on in those subjects? Calling me a fucking loser for staying somewhere that’s the only place to do some things is not going to accomplish anything but make me think you don’t know what you’re talking about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I used to use the excuse of using Twitter to get my news, but I gave up after the rebranding. Now I just go to the news organizations’ websites.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

Literally cannot get hockey updates from any other platform. Those journalists just simply have not moved to another platform.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Sports media all around is still heavily invested in Twitter and has shown no signs of even looking at alternate platforms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I think I saw one guy on Threads, but he had to stop posting there because simply nobody saw his posts there and there was no engagement from his colleagues.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Google it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Google what exactly? Specific contract details or bits from interviews which are, in many cases, posted behind paywalls (The Athletic) outside of the little bits that they put on Twitter? Literally just cannot get that information otherwise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-45 points
*

I’ve asked for a compelling reason to leave many times before, and so far people have failed to provide me one, but since you’re so smart, lets hear it it then.

EDIT: Downvote if you can’t come up with a good reason

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

You seem like the target demographic, actually.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The lax restrictions on nazi speech. It’s now part of the platform. The platform tacitly endorses hatred. Your attention legitimizes the platform and the nazis. It’s time to walk away, you have a moral obligation.

I get it you have an addiction to the website. We need to start talking about social media addiction without sneering. It’s a dopamine release machine and we are big stupid apes. I’m here on lemmy because it is like methadone to get me off Reddit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

I spend probably less than an hour a week on twitter compared to 2 to 3 hours a day on lemmy and 3 to 5 hours a day on youtube so addiction definitely, but not to twitter.

When it comes to the nazi, or just overall right wing content, it’s only something I hear people talk about but haven’t ever experienced myself. Those things don’t appear on my feed. It’s 99% porn and 1% cat videos.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*
  • it’s a failing platform run by one of the most chaotic people in existence; everything you make there will literally or figuratively go up in smoke, from the posts to the connections
  • everything you make there is currently lining the pockets of a racist, lying nationalist
  • it’s losing money at an alarming rate while being beholden to the debt caused by the leveraged buyout that sold out to the aforementioned chaotic bro, meaning that they’re increasingly desperate to make money and will take more and more morally dubious deals in order to stay afloat
  • the racism is a feature, not a bug, tacitly and overtly endorsed by the current owner
  • the misinformation is a feature, not a bug, tacitly and overtly endorsed by the current owner
  • the nationalism is a feature, not a bug, tacitly and overtly endorsed by the current owner
  • they’re systematically stripping user control and transparency out of the platform, from ads and targeting to user blocking to outgoing links
  • they’re absolutely going to keep putting every useful feature behind Twitter Blue or whatever they’re calling it these days
  • uptime might be stable for now, but as soon as more bills become due it’s going to tank again
  • a venerable and respected platform has been reduced to this in a matter of months because of one man’s ego and hubris
  • the longer you delay in building a new platform and new habits only makes it harder for you to do so when all this finally does become too much for you

These are only eleven reasons. I have many more, some personal and some universal. If at all possible, get off of Twitter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Well I can grant you that me continuing to use twitter likely somewhat profits people I don’t have much respect for, but then again I’m posting gay porn so there’s slight irony there too.

The other reasons you listed are mostly stuff other people are experiencing, but not me. There’s no politics in my twitter feed. No nazies, no racism, no nationalists, no Elon Musk, no ads… just porn and the occasional cat video.

I must also point out that it’s quite apparent from your message, that you have a strong personal bias involved here. I don’t have that same emotional reaction to this. Social media is shit by definition and I don’t see twitter as any different from the rest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

I’ll let you know when I start seeing ads

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*

Lets just take a moment to appreciate the fact, that you were already calling me dumb, and now you’re telling me to fuck off, and another user is calling me retarded yet somehow it’s me acting in bad faith.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 543K

    Comments