188 points

Great, now criminally charge him.

permalink
report
reply
90 points

Nope, they’ll hire him at another county no problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Yup. Looking forward to hearing about that in a few months.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Yeah, Adams county just a bit further south from Circleville would LOVE to hire this guy

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

At another state*

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Nah, that’s too far. Probably his same city will hire him back after everything calms down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
84 points

Asshole should be charged

permalink
report
reply
42 points

Absolutely. Assault on an unarmed civilian, clear unnecessary use of force on video, over a stop for a mud flap.

Why didn’t the prosecutor charge him yet? The video isn’t enough evidence?

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Presumably he was fired for forgetting to turn his camera off. Not for the action itself.

It’s a PR move to try to limit fallout.

Full on criminal investigations take ages, so the firing comes now and by the time the prosecution gets round to criminal charges the police force can have distance themselves nicely in that time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The state cops were there too and told him not to do it. I’m guessing that was also a factor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

While criminal investigation does take time, yes, that doesn’t stop them from arresting people ahead of time if there’s even a moderate amount of evidence. I mean, that’s never stopped police from arresting “suspicious” black people (eg, someone who simply happened to be black in an area where a crime was allegedly committed by another black person; even if they look nothing alike). Police consistently treat themselves with kid gloves while treating people of colour as hyper dangerous and must be immediately arrested (or shot).

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Bingo, they intentionally fired him in such a way that union arbitration will get him a reinstatement where he’ll get letters of recommendation and a lateral to another department.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

He’ll be a new hire in a neighboring County in a couple of months.

This is a resume builder for a lot of cops

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Exactly, it should be fired, charged, loss of required policing license if found guilty (or if a police license board decides so, even without conviction)

Currently I’ll take just fired and charged, since we don’t have policing licenses as of yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Which is really strange because clearly they’re a liability that will attract future lawsuits and misconduct. There’s a reason hospitals don’t hire doctors and nurses who got fired from other hospitals for bad behavior. But cops don’t pay out those lawsuits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Costs will be paid by city or county taxpayers, as the case may be. So no financial pain will ever be felt by the department that hires a shit bag like this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It may look like you’re exaggerating to the casual observer, but as an Ohioan, this exact same scenario happened in my county and the county next to me. An officer handcuffed a mentally disabled woman and drug her down the stairs by her ankles, face down, and roughed her up a bit. He was fired from the Wayne County sheriff’s dept and hired onto the Holmes County sheriff’s dept the next week.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

good. charge his ass. police shouldn’t be able to break the law and get away with it

permalink
report
reply
27 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
3 points

I agree that he should be arrested, convicted and spend a good amount of time in jail. But just out of curiosity, what’s the penalty for someone whose dog severely injures someone? Of course police dogs should be held to a higher standard and it varies by city/country, but is the average person responsible legally or civilly if their dog injures someone? I hope someone in this community has an idea, I’m very curious

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I figured as much. I’m hoping an internet lawyer will find my comment lol

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 387K

    Comments