I only partly live under a rock, so I’ve now heard that the Facebooks is making Threads, and it’ll talk to Mastodon.
Any idea how to keep them from taking over? Apparently, you’re a weirdo these days if you use Firefox, Brave/Qwant, and trust FLOSS > proprietary.
i saw a quote today which said the grass is always greener where you water it; so i suppose, you should keep engaging with the federated communities you want to support. After all, Meta wants engagment so chose not to engage with what you dont believe in
https://fedipact.online/ for one, but it’s important to realize Facebook isn’t the only company that tries to pull embrace, extend, extinguish. Even lemmy.ml or mastodon.social (being by far the most popular instances in their networks) are vulnerable to compromise. It’s up to the users to distribute themselves across enough instances that one individual instance can’t call the shots.
Edit: this comment changed my mind. In a nutshell, if we can’t keep a large instance controlled by “the enemy” from destroying what we’ve got, then we just have to do better next time.
Threads or whatever Meta might introduce is just a specific example of the problem with a controlling instance.
Bitcoin has to take steps to avoid a 51% attack lest the whole thing come crashing down.
Condo buyers have to make sure they are not buying into something where the developer keeps over half of the units as rentals in order to control the board.
I think the fediverse has to also guard against any one instance hosting too large a fraction of users. I’m not sure that it even takes being as big as half the users. I’m not sure what a critical mass would be, but I’m sure that a large enough instance could “go critical.”
We don’t need to do anything. They simply can’t. ActivityPub is designed that way.
This is unfortunately wrong. ActivityPub is designed much like email is. Yet virtually everybody uses Gmail and the standards Gmail enforces apply to everybody else through network effects.
Defederating is something at least. But in reality like all societal problems stemming from late stage capitalism, the only true answers are extremely illegal
Who said we’re in late stage capitalism? If you ask the libertarians, we’ve been out of any sincere capitalism since WWII.
The best way is going to constantly remind people that there’s alternative ways to see the same content.
Because most people are used to centralization and never ask themselves if there’s different ways to access the same content.
Even on Reddit, where third-party apps were wildly popular, most users were still shocked third-party apps were a thing, and many didn’t understand why someone would even want that.
It’s not gonna work unless there’s prominent users with loads of followers around to remind people it works more like email addresses than plain Threads handles.
