Republicans are drunk with power. What a stupid fucking idea. There’s no chance of banning porn. Then they wouldn’t be able to jerk to Trans women and feel shame after.

Trans women are hot, in case that reads as though the shame is correct. It’s not.

148 points

“Obscenity isn’t protected by the First Amendment, but hazy and unenforceable legal definitions have allowed extreme pornography to saturate American society and reach countless children,” Lee said in a press release. “Our bill updates the legal definition of obscenity for the internet age so this content can be taken down and its peddlers prosecuted.”

My memory is a bit hazy, but I think this phrasing is taken almost verbatim from Project 2025.

permalink
report
reply
66 points

They are jumping the gun a little here. Project 2025 has declaring basically anything a transperson does as pornographic first then this. Guess some incompetence in execution shouldn’t be surprising from their crowd.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

I think the order of operations is almost unimportant if their opposition can only secure minor, temporary victories and nobody is truly stopping them. If anything the broad stroke of this bill could be used as cover while states quietly criminalize homosexuality and transgenderism by fiat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

When you use AI to write your bills and tell it to implement Project 2025.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Obscenity isn’t protected by the First Amendment

Is this the same Constitution that they’re pissing on with everything else? It most certainly does protect it. Do NOT use the “think of the children” shit when your actions towards children safety has been the complete opposite. Hell, I saw news today of further cuts being pursued for Medicare, as well as past things on cutting school lunches and of course the destruction of the DoE. You do NOT care about children, do not bring them into this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Actually they’ve been trying to invoke the Comstock Act constantly to force ISPs to block porn sites. This particular rallying cry is something I remember since the late Bush II years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Will no one think of the children? Whenever these people say something, the best strategy is look in the opposite direction they are pointing you. In this instance, they are working to pass child-bride full-legalization. They’re definitely thinking of the children.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Don’t forget Florida trying to weaken child labor laws. MAGA. If the mine was good enough for great grandpa, it’s good enough for you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Guns fall into children’s hands all the time, something that literally kills, and they don’t seem to give a shit about that

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Hmm. Maybe this’ll be what wakes America 🤣

permalink
report
reply
14 points

DVDs, video compression, high speed Internet, wouldn’t be the first time it was a driving force

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Don’t forget Blu-ray!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

VR, AI…

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

project 2025 became public before the elections

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Unlikely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Who’s gonna tell Ted Cruz?

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Lindsey Graham

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

who is this Bill, and what does he have against porn. does Bill not know that his other name is Willy?

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Bill is like Richard, a dick.

permalink
report
parent
reply
315 points

They don’t intend to ban anything. They’re just creating reasons to lock people up.

They are, to a man, insane authoritarian shitbags. All they care about is control.

permalink
report
reply
217 points

The plan according to project 2025 is to classify trans people existing as pornographic. Wish I was joking. Been warning people about this for a year now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
104 points

Anything related to queer identities could fall under obscenity by whatever arbitrary definitions they want to use.

No more pride or rainbow flags, no support groups for queer youth, no sex education, all of that is obscene.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Basically everything they have to say on the subject is thinley veiled homophobia and should be treated as such

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

so just like Russia

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

The original documents for project 2025 were released in 2017 well leaked in 2017. And it was talked about for about the day and disappeared and here we are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

It really made the rounds again in 2020, even to the point of breaking into the mainstream. Probably a lot more people are aware of it than you might think, it’s just the doing something about it that we’re all sticking on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Project 2025 has been happening in Oklahoma since 2017. No one gave a shit when it was the asshole of the country, but shit spreads.

Y’all get to enjoy the suffering I’ve been enjoying for the past ten years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

The text that became Project 2025 has been published every four years or so since the Regan administration.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Yup, it’s the typical conservative playbook: If you don’t like something, redefine it as something unpopular. Then target the unpopular thing, so democrats can’t oppose it without inciting “this democrat voted against a bill to protect/stop {sympathetic demographic} from {unpopular thing}” smear campaigns.

Step 1 was equating trans people with sexual predators. You keep that messaging consistent and constant. Find stories of trans people doing normal things, but spin it as if they’re dangerous. Invent stories if you need to, because debunking them takes a lot more time than inventing them…

They weren’t jogging in a neighborhood; they were casing the neighborhood. They weren’t using a public restroom; they were looking for people to sexually assault. They weren’t trying on clothes to see if they fit; they were looking to assault women and children in the changing rooms. They weren’t volunteering for the local women’s shelter; They were looking for defenseless victims. They weren’t writing a book for other trans people; They were indoctrinating kids and trying to turn them trans. Et cetera, et cetera…

Once conservative voters have started to accept that messaging, you move onto step 2:
“This bill will protect children from sexual predators” means it bans trans people from being able to pee.
“This bill will protect children from being exposed to dangerous sexual material” means it bans any kind of trans iconography by labeling it as porn.
“This bill will stop sexual predators from hiding in your neighborhood” means it requires trans people to register in a public database/wear a {pink triangle} badge.
“This bill will ensure sexual predators are kept away from the rest of the population” means it rounds trans people up into camps.

And if anybody ever tries to point out what the bill is really doing, put them on blast with the “radical left is trying to let sexual predators steal your kids and assault your women” messaging.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Sure would be nice if the not-as-conservatives could use their own tactics to flip the script on them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I disagree that it’s conservative. It’s nazi/ authoritarian/radical. For 50 odd years afer ww2 the cons knew this was a daft tactic. Prior to that (well prior to 1790 ish ) con/feudal/landowners managed their serfs and peasants, they didn’t want infighting. (outfighting, thats a different , maybe lucrative albeit lottery).

Cons are just common or garden cunts. populists are serious, they can mobilise labour .

The traditional cons wil ride the wave because they have no choice and no friends. until they realise they’ll be expropriated eventually, which the nazis won’t do until after they have critical mass. Fucking con Niemollers

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

For-profit prison system goes, “Brrrrrrrrrr!!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

That is the pragmatic and short term outcome, but I would not discount the level of power hard-line Christian nationalists have over the far right. Many of them believe “moral degeneracy” like porn is the most grave problem of western society and would be glad to “correct” it given the chance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Please don’t drag the insane down to this level. This is planned and intentional (even if there is factional opposition)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

To be fair, Control is a pretty great game

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It is.

We need more media to take advantage of the SCP Foundation. Movies, games, etc. Give the authors credit. Pay them. Because there’s a whole lot of great stuff there.

SCP-001 “When Day Breaks” would make an incredible horror movie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oh definitely, 100%

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 28K

    Posts

  • 682K

    Comments