This meme is from 2004. History repeats itself.

179 points
*
87 points
*

It’s important to note that the real disparity may be even far worse.

OCHA-OPT (the committee gathering this data) is strict about verifying validity of Palestinian casualties, requiring two independent, verified and non-affiliated sources. Casualties in Israel, however, they trust the media at face value. They also exclude a lot of Palestinian casualties even when verified in certain situations. Example, and I quote them:

People who were killed or injured in conflict-related incidents that took place in Israel and did not involve residents of the oPt are also excluded.

oPt (occupied Palestinian territories) are the areas that Israel does not directly oversee. So most of Israel is not oPt by their criteria.

Israel is notorious for restricting journalists reporting on Israeli crimes, and has murdered journalists countless of times, like last year the Christian Palestinian Shireen Abu Akleh reporting on the forced expulsion of Palestinians from Sheikh Jarrah (so not even in a war zone area). This causes many casualties to go unverified and thus undocumented.

And Israel has been caught lying before about its own casualties, like the 40 beheaded babies.

Take that as you will.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

That 2023 number is about to get way more lopsided.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Wouldn’t be surprised if it ends up the same ratio as 2014

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They’ve got a long road ahead of them to kill that many people but i admit the thought occurred to me as well. There does seem to be a ratio being followed here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

So seriously, fuck the closet racist xenophobes masquerading as defenders of freedom and democracy here. Tools of the state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Didn’t look like you’re replying to anyone supporting Hamas.

Also, there is an alternative #2 in your scenario. “Know your enemy would lose too much western support too readily if they were to fine on all the civilian targets they would like to”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Imagine how things may go if Israel attempted to use Jews as human shields against Hamas.

You mean like putting many settlements and civilians right on the border of Gaza, a concentration camp and active war Zone? Or allowing a rave dance to occur at the gates of a concentration camp and active war zone, and next to a military base that would be targeted by Hamas? And sprinkle in some IDF tanks while you’re at it.

Wait, we don’t have to imagine it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
110 points

It isn’t anti-Semitism to criticize israel, it’s just noticing the obvious.

permalink
report
reply
64 points

There are criticisms that are antisemitic. This isn’t one of them, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The only one I can think of is the idea that the Jews made up the Holocaust to guilt the West into giving up Israel… Which is indeed antisemetic, and asburd

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

My favorite was when Bernie Sanders was called antisemitic for criticizing Israel. His response was something along the lines of “It isn’t antisemitic to criticize a right-wing government in Israel.” It must’ve taken all the patience in the world to not add “you fucking toolbags”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m not a Christian, but if Bernie was the second coming…

I’d be only slightly surprised

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Fascists get away with conflating Judaism and Zionism because they don’t teach that Zionism has absolutely nothing to do with Judaism, and actually goes against a lot of their values. It’s actually been around for quite awhile; you know the crusades, when they went around killing a bunch of civilians to set up settlements? Those were Christian Zionists.

That’s why it’s anti-semitic to conflate the two. One is a religion and the other is a fascist genocidal colonialist movement. So next time you see some german lady shouting down a holocaust survivor for calling out Israeli apartheid (yes, this literally happened, and it was the Jewish guy who got punished) you’ll see it for what it is. It’s not complicated, it’s a clear cut case of modern day nazism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Amen, who was it who said that the way to find out what group is getting away with too much bullshit is to look at what group you’re not allowed to criticize in any Circle?

permalink
report
parent
reply
100 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
76 points
*

No. Hundreds of thousands will die in response to hundreds dying. The comic is still fully accurate even if “a single missile” is still condemnable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Shall we begin an era of endless terror by proving it works?

Just look at the US military, we already have

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I felt just like this after 9/11. I don’t know enough about your country to tell you what the right thing to do is. But I wish that the USA could go back in time and just gradually assassinate Al Queda with the CIA instead or something. Those occupations were doomed from the start.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Where did I mock the victims? Do not put words in my mouth. Can you not make a half-sound argument without lying?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

It IS NOT a disproportionate representation. THAT’S THE POINT.

I am very sorry you fail to realize what death Israel will doll out in response, but this comic is completely accurate in the proportions displayed.

You LITERALLY have fighter jets and bombers striking back against … paragliders with guns…

Again, NO ONE except fucking losers are saying Hamas did anything good. That doesn’t make murdering dozens of thousands of Palestinians OK.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

I don’t think disproportionate response doctrine from countries like the US and Israel should come as a surprise after more than half a century of conflict. Why murder 100 innocent people of your opponent when you know they will murder 1000 innocents of your people in response?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The issue isn’t whether anyone is surprised by it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It may not be a surprise but it’s still disgusting and worth calling out.

Take 9/11 for an example, in response to a few thousand dying, America invaded Iraq (who was not even responsible) and killed several orders of magnitude more people. As well as looting their wealth, subordinating their government and economy to American interests, and effectively occupying them for two decades. Anytime an American says “never forget” they should be reminded how thoroughly soaked in blood they are.

Likewise, when zionists shed crocodile tears for a few hundred dead festival goers who were depraved enough to go raving only a few short kilometers from the world’s largest concentration camp. They must be reminded of what they have done to Palestine. Invasion. Displacement. Occupation. Ethnic cleansing. Apartheid. Imprisonment. Genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

When it comes to war, there can be no holdbacks because hesitation means life or death.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

So anyone who follows the Geneva Conventions is a doomed fool?

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

“history repeats itself” as in the people who only condemn needless killing when Hamas does it, but ignore the Palestinian cause the rest of the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-29 points

It’s almost like motivation, methods, intentions, and circumstances matter and not just body count. For example, intentionally targeting civilians to maximize civilian deaths is not the same as accidentally killing civilians with collateral damage while trying to minimize civilian deaths.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points
*

Guess which side this is, then:

Scores of people, mainly women and children, have been killed in multiple air strikes on the main road connecting north and south Gaza, as people carried out an Israeli order to flee their homes.

According to the Ministry of Health, at least 70 people have been killed in three separate air strikes on the road, with the latest killing at least 40.

The Israeli army said in a statement on Friday that civilians must leave Gaza City in the north, and that they would not be allowed to return “until we say so” and until “a statement is issued allowing this”.

However, locals have reported a number of attacks on the Salah al-Din Road since then. Survivors, speaking to local media, implored others not to make the journey for fear of being targeted by the Israelis.

“Do not leave,” a distraught survivor of the attacks told local media.

“They bombed the convoy. They bombed it on Salah al-Din Road. They bombed the ambulances.”

Another survivor said the attacks were a “direct targeting of women and children”.

“I was in the truck. There were about 200 people. 90 percent were women and children. We took the main road that the entire world knew we were taking. My entire family were with me. Out of nowhere, they dropped a bomb. Everything was black and I lost conscience for 10 mins,” they told local media.

“When I woke up I saw a mother lying with her baby, whose brain was right next to him. I heard the ambulances then they bombed again. I took cover and after a few minutes tried to check the damage, then they bombed again.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

When Israeli soldiers are bragging about raping and torturing people, it’s very clear what their intentions are

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

while trying to minimize civilian deaths

If that’s what they’re trying to do, they really fucking suck at it.

And the motivation, methods, intentions, and circumstances don’t matter a bit to the victims and their loved ones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

While they do certainly look different, the end result of a death by malice or by ignorance is the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yes, it’s not a perfect caricature, Crimea river

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Rules of the internet: you can safely discard everything that comes before the “, but”

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

If ignoring context helps you feed your bias, go for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The soundness of your argument should not depend on your stance. It is a common tactic to state that you are “pro-X” but criticize X, because people are more likely to sympathize with your criticism that way. The commenter you replied to is simply reminding us of this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-35 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Ignoring of course the countless children they kill who aren’t part of hamas. The ratio of children to adults killed by Israel can only be reached by doing it on purpose.

You “switching sides” because you don’t like the media reporting on these murders is a joke and I can only assume a lie, because it doesn’t make sense.

The media reporting stuff doesn’t change what is happening nor the morals and ethics involved. Silly to blame the media for you choosing to support the murder of innocents.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
*

Yes the Israelis don’t kill children for throwing rocks and then call them soldiers

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I’d like to add even more context: ~45% of Palestine is under the age of 14.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

Dafuq is this meme? civilians are civilians, regardless of the country religion or whatever the duck they’re born in.

permalink
report
reply
90 points
*

If civilians are civilians…

"Amongst Israelis, 69% of those killed were civilians and 31% members of the IDF. The number of Israeli civilians killed, from attacks by Palestinian armed groups or individuals, has declined steadily, peaking in 2002 at an average of 22 deaths per month, and dropping markedly to an average of one civilian per month in 2007. 6/

In contrast to Israeli figures, however, Palestinian civilian fatalities have remained high. Palestinian civilians, killed by Israeli security forces, peaked with an average of 35 deaths per month in 2002, and again in 2004. In 2007 they dropped slightly to an average of ten civilian deaths per month."

https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-208380/

Both sides kill civilians with abandon, and Israel is markedly better at it. Major media doesn’t seem to care very much about Palestinian civilians though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-25 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points
*

Fair, but the point is that there is no side here playing by the no civilians rule, yet only Palestinians are called out for it.

The headline of the newest chapter in this shitshow for some reason is “How could Hamas attack Civilians?! Civilians?!” When the reality is that hasn’t really been a red line to the Israeli government or Hamas. Never has been.

Its evil all day, don’t get me wrong. The twisted thing is that somehow Israel is somehow perpetually marketed as being the good guys playing by the rules of engagement in spite of being no different with regards to killing non-enemy combatants.

Why are israeli civilian concert goers a global tragedy, while Palestinian civilian casualties past and present just another thursday? Why doesn’t the world lose its shit at 10 Palestinian civilians killed a month? Are Palestinians somehow universally recognized as having less value as human beings than Israelis?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

How is cutting water, electricity and bombing houses and hospitals “protecting the civilians”? Think a little bit please.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

That’s a funny way to say “Israel has continued to fire at defenseless civilians”

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

I completely agree with you. Which is why when you look at the grotesque number of civilians Israel kills every year it’s pretty easy to condem them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-41 points

Get off your high horse colonizer

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Israel is the colonizers in this instance and I’m opposing them so???

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Uh, what?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Do you somehow not realise that is exactly the point being made?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

YES, because OP is typing words that can be misconstrued as being a shill or a bigoted asshole. I’m smart enough to recognize it if you point it out, but I’m not fucking psychic, and I’m the kind of person who believes in dream prophesies so that just shows that neither potential delusion nor intelligence have anything to do with people misreading things online. It’s just human and technical limitations, but your italics are clear so: if you don’t want people to be annoyed at you, maybe respond without being condescending.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How could you misconstrue their words that way?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Jesus Christ I had to scroll through like, 10 top level comments to find someone with a measure of reason. I’m actually stunned.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Israel kills more civilians.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
9 points

sounds like something The Other Side would say

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

You don’t live in an open air prison so enjoy it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Unfortunately, those that don’t fall under what you’re describing simply don’t comment because they know it’s a massive, nuanced issue, so all you’re seeing are the loudest, least nuanced voices

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think it’s technically a thousands of years quagmire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Nope. It began in late 19th century at the earliest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

and like a football match, people are watching it happen live on youtube

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This real time information spread during the Ukrainian invasion and this, is so crazy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

I hope more of you fake nuanced people go back to Reddit.

“bro please bro it’s complicated bro you can’t oppose apartheid bro have you not considered it’s complicated bro? Please bro you have to maintain status quo”

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 259K

    Comments