Attacks and doxing make me personally MORE likely to support stronger safety features in chromium, as such acts increase my suspicion that there is significant intimidation from criminals who are afraid this feature will disrupt their illegal and/or unethical businesses, and I don’t give in to criminals or bullies

Kick a puppy
Get attacked for kicking a puppy
“These attacks make me MORE likely to keep kicking puppies, as I don’t give in to intimidation from criminals and bullies that want healthy puppies for their nefarious ends.”

-59 points
*

Kick a puppy

If you have to resort to false equivalences like these, you’re not really making the anti-WEI crowd look good.


*Edit: * There’s some massive misunderstanding about my comment.

I called it a false equivalency because it’s comparing both the measures (“stronger safety”) and the thing is supposed to prevent (doxing and bullying) to puppy kicking.

That’s just emotional manipulation done badly. We all call it out when politicians use pedophiles to warrant Internet surveillance, and now apply it ourselves? I don’t know about you, but when I see bad reasoning, I’ll call it out. Even if it’s done by “my side”.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

This is quite a bit worse than kicking a puppy. Of course, it’s horrible when puppies get kicked but ultimately they will be on. This, on the other hand would be a major set back to humanity, potentially permanent as our rights and privacy are erroded day by day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

Agree

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

That is an analogy.

The analogy being, do something objectively bad, get called out for it, double down because you don’t like getting called out for it.

No one is equivocating anti-wei people to puppies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

There’s some massive misunderstanding about my comment.

I called it a false equivalency because it’s comparing both the measures (“stronger safety”) and the thing is supposed to prevent (doxing and bullying) to puppy kicking.

That’s just emotional manipulation done badly. We all call it out when politicians use pedophiles to warrant Internet surveillance, and now apply it ourselves? I don’t know about you, but when I see bad reasoning, I’ll call it out. Even if it’s done by “my side”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No, it was not a comparison, it was an ANALOGY.

“A relationship of resemblance or equivalence between two situations, people, or objects, especially when used as a basis for explanation or extrapolation.”

The important word here is resemblance. This is an analogy showing a resemblance, not a comparison.

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

Analogies are inherently false equivalences.

It’s illustrating the problem with the argument, not equating DRM technology with puppy kicking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

Both support stronger safety features in chromium and criminals and bullies got equated to kicking puppies. That’s why it’s a shoddy attempt at illustrating their reasoning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Though, for the record, this is one of the few situations where humanity would have been better off if Google had simply paid their web engineers to go out into the world and kick animals all day long instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

I think the comment that the_lego is replying to also highlights the false equivalency of calling the anti-WEI crowd as criminals, as was not a good look for Google.

They have apologized for using the word criminals & bullies in a broader context and I appreciate that. However, the initial part of the comment is very telling of how they view those who oppose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Google must have forgotten when they sued Microsoft for trying to corner the browser market for Internet Explorer. Or maybe they are two faced.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

No no, they sued because they were behind.

Now they are not. Nothing wrong anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That was for tying IE to Windows, and it was also done while there were paid web browsers competing with them. Then they forced OEM PC makers to bundle IE or get dropped as a customer for Windows licenses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I mean “either use a Chromium browser or you can’t display or use the site” sounds pretty similar to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Couldn’t agree more

However, unlike bundling a browser by default, you’d need to get a lot of websites to agree to “be normal” and support multiple browsers properly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Then they went and made Chrome OS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Companies have only one goal, more profit. Both actions here work to that goal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Companies never sue because of idealism or values. They sue to get an advantage.

Same as Musk, who is publically harshly against government subsidies for companies. Unless he’s the recipent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Upvoted to keep attention on this thing, but that really was a vacuous article with almost no real information in it.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Yeah, I found the discussions on HN and the debates in the Google group mailing list (“Intent to Prototype: Web environment integrity API”) much more interesting, but didn’t hot link the latter in the OP post to limit brigading. Although that mail list archive is made publicly accessable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
39 points

That’s a good initiative from google to put more tracktion behind firefox again. Its userbase and amount of supporters will skyrocket!

permalink
report
reply
11 points

No, it won’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

It really won’t, but I wish it would.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You’re right that it won’t. I will say that I switched from Firefox to chrome when it was still in beta (nobody I talk to ever remembers the “goats teleported” metric). Chrome was way faster. It didn’t handle memory well, but it was the best for me for a long time. The extensions were great.

I just downloaded Firefox on all my devices and I’ve been happy so far. Not as fast as chrome or edge, but gets me closer to leaving google.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s also difficult to ‘leave’ chromium when many of the alternative browsers are based on the engine.

I love Vivaldi, but at it’s cute it’s running the Google web engine. This is also going to be part of the problem.

There are very few non-Google web engines, and even fewer being used by other browser makers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’ve been using Firefox since before they released their “Quantum” update, thankfully, and it’s been quite good for me since then. Still though, we’re going to need way more people switching to make a dent in Chromium - if it’s even possible at this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Programming

!programming@programming.dev

Create post

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person’s post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you’re posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don’t want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



Community stats

  • 3K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.7K

    Posts

  • 28K

    Comments