3 points

LOL, that’s cute. Reddit doesn’t even know my real email address.

permalink
report
reply
65 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
43 points

Silly nonsense. Just cause I said I downloaded something isn’t proof I did it. If I said I murdered someone you still have to proof I did it especially if there is no god damn body. In other words: they have to link my comments to a download I did via vpn years ago. Yeah, good luck losers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

If they have no proof prior, they will absolutely wreck you with a comment like that linked to an account you own. That’s a confession, which you made, it is idiotic as you gained nothing admitting to it.

Only because many people don’t care, doesn’t mean it doesn’t matter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

A comment on social media is not a confession.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

They would never get a conviction on the statement alone though. What it probably would do, is lead to them turning over every stone in your life to find proof. They’d do that because it’s enough to arouse suspicion but not enough to get you convicted in any way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Bit of a leap there. I’m talking about confessing to murdering someone on reddit for instance cause that is what we are talking about: comments made years ago on reddit. Yeah, sure, maybe someone will tell the cops and they will have to investigate you based on your comment about murdering someone, but then what? Sure, it will have consequences for me, but they cannot convict me based of a single comment and nothing else. How the hell is that going to hold up in any court?
And now think back on what we are actually talking about: comments admitting to having illegally downloaded some content. I would assume they won’t even try to start investigating that. Like how on earth are you going to get proof of that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Alright buddy, that’s a horrendous example. You’re comparing MURDER to downloading End Game…

Here’s the real comp, go into the police station with a grin and say I just littered 3 towns away in a park, I threw a candy wrapper on the floor, it even has my fingerprint! But you’ll never catch me coppers!

They’d shrug and ask you to leave. No-one is starting a manhunt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Actually no. Pretending to have committed a crime is a crime itself. At least here in Germany.

Also: saying you committed a crime is basically the same as a confession and can definitely be used against you

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The lawsuit does not involve Germany in the slightest

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Also keep in mind that at least in Germany the act of just downloading something is not illegal. Only the uploading/seeding of content is. So just admitting to having downloaded something is not admitting to a crime at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Pretending to have committed a crime is a crime itself

Gotta listen to some Götz Widmann haha.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I… don’t think that’s true.

I’d expect to get convicted if I make a (reasonable) confession of murdering someone who vanished, even if there is no single other bit of evidence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You won’t. It happens all the time. Youd be amazed how many people try to claim credit for crimes they didn’t commit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Not if you made that confession outside of any prosecution process and then withdrew it saying you were just making shit up, I wouldn’t think.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Right, if you go to the police and confess to the murder of someone who vanished you are going to be in trouble. But we are talking about some reddit comments “confessing” to downloading something illegally. I could have been more specific with the example though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Been teaching my kid this. Do what you’re expected to do, follow directions from teachers and parents, so that when you do something you’re not supposed to and if you get caught, they won’t even believe you did it. Hide in plain site and cover your tracks by thinking of what you’d look for trying to catch someone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

It’s like people are forgetting that piracy is actually illegal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

They’re just lying about pirating to look cool.

I highly doubt there are any actual pirates on here, it’s just users being edgy. A bunch of dorks that don’t even own a boat role playing badass pirates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’d like to be that variety of pirate, at least in the older style. Not so much a modern nautical pirate though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Does a canoe count?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I think many people just couldn’t care less about pirating and believe the companies can’t figure out who they are. For example, I discuss pirating stuff pretty openly on my reddit account. But every single comment I make, I consciously make sure to not reveal enough for people to dox me.

I also don’t have Facebook which is how most people figure out identities.

“Hmm, they’re an underwater welder from a specific small town and they have three sons. Well this is the only Facebook profile that matches that so I bet it’s this person” type of thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You are only truly anonymous if you always use a VPN or Tor. If not, Reddit has your IP and the ISP knows who is behind the IP. If LE knocks at Reddit’s door with a warrant, they will give them your IP, with which they go to the ISP to get your name.

they’re an underwater welder from a specific small town and they have three sons

You would be suprised of how much less info than that is needed to ID a person. There are studies about ID’ing people via their favorites and last-watched lists on netflix.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

What is illegal for Americans is not illegal everywhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
  1. I’m not American either.
  2. The vast majority of countries in the world have copyright.

Now I’m not morally against piracy, pirate away. It’s just illegal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

. But to actively say, ‘I downloaded X, from Y. It worked great.’ and/or ‘I’ve downloaded loads from X, I have over a thousand X, and they all work.’ it makes me cringe.

Not evidence of a crime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I came to confess. I was the 2nd gunman on the grassy knoll.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Liar, I shot first. You were third

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think a lot of it is to do with the actual chance that the individual is going to get charged with it, big companies generally go after the Distributors and not the individuals regarding it. Plus staying online that you did something doesn’t prove that you actually did it so they would still have to get solid evidence that you actually did it which costs money A lot of times more money than they would have lost from the pirating activity in the first place which is why a lot of them just settle for sending a dmca to the ISP and the ISP for as it saying LOL you better not be doing this

permalink
report
parent
reply
155 points

The MPAA really is grasping for straws aren’t they. Ever since people were able to stream movies during the pandemic and found it was a much cheaper more enjoyable experience, they have been trying to invent ways to drive people back to the theaters. Now they are suffering major block buster busts and they have to point the finger at someone so they think, “it’s those darn Reddit pirates!” Its funny that they don’t realize they caused their own demise. But really I wonder, why specifically 2011?

permalink
report
reply
67 points

Right? Yeah, piracy is the reason people don’t go to the movies. It has nothing to do with the overpriced, nasty concessions (cold, overly salty popcorn), dirty floors, uncomfortable “reclining” seats, gimmicks (4DX, RPX, XD), staff that can’t be bothered to turn off the lights at showtime or properly configure the sound systems. All while you’re paying $15 per ticket and $30 on snacks.

These morons live in an entirely different world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The gap between reality and what corporate shills who probably don’t even use their own product think is reality is ever widening.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Not to mention the comparison between watching a movie at home, where you know it will be silent, versus the risk of having at least one (but often more) groups of people who will not shut the fuck up the whole time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Can also pause, rewind, fast forward, lie down, and more at home

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It has nothing to do with the overpriced, nasty concessions (cold, overly salty popcorn), dirty floors

Ugh, this just reminds me of all those times I went to the theater, and no matter where I walked I would hear the squish sound from my shoes coming into contact with something sticky… I do not miss that at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I think they are short staffed aka underpaid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Agreed. That means that the current business model for movie theaters is unsustainable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

It’s funny because we subscribe to the AMC A-List and go to the movies quite a bit (obviously this is in the US). But it’s because a) we have a couple of AMC theatres close by, and b) it’s just me and my spouse, no kids involved. So it’s something that to us is worthwhile (having a night out a few times a months to see a movie on the big screen). Also, we never buy concessions. I can’t imagine how an average family with a bunch of kids can just go and drop over 100 bucks on tickets and concessions on any given night.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Disagree that it’s more enjoyable than going to the theaters. There is a social aspect of going to movies with friend groups that’s hard to replicate at home. People don’t have space to fit 12 friends to comfortably watch a new release.

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

2011 is well outside the Statute of Limitations for infringement…

That’s three years with some wiggle room for ongoing infringement.

This is likely an intimidation/shakedown thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Could be that they’re looking to block similar usernames in their streaming services?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Sounds more like they’re going after Grande. Belief being the testimony would allow them to build a case that Grande incited or somehow induced privacy which would strip them from a number of legal protections that may apply to service providers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Statute of limitations??

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Only on criminal law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So piracy is a civil crime, not a criminal one? Awww 😩 All this time I thought I was cooler than I really am. (Sad arrr noises)

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Create post
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don’t submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-fi Liberapay

Community stats

  • 4.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.3K

    Posts

  • 78K

    Comments