37 points

systemd is a FANTASTIC set of tools, well integrated into the environment, and allows powerful configurations to be set very easily. Anybody arguing for the “old ways” has never had to set up a complex network environment using an interfaces file and a million other configuration tools.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

The debate isn’t even funny anymore, it ended completely IMO when Debian decided on systemd, despite heavy propaganda with wild promises about how amazing they planned to make upstart. Promises that were never gonna happen, and some of the problems they promised to solve, had been left unsolved by upstart developers for years. Some of them allegedly because they were basically impossible to solve in upstart, because the basic design concept is flawed, just like other init systems based on the System V legacy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I love how well received pipewire was/is compared to the drama systemd and Wayland got.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

That’s because all the audio drama focused on PulseAudio.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Don’t even mention anything about Nvidia. Basically it’s just a call for an infinite flamewar between everyone and one guy

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Who in the Linux community would say anything positive about NVIDIA?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Hardware is pretty awesome. Everything else, no so much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Yeah because they refuse to work with the open source community lol. Don’t care how great their stuff is if they’re borderline openly hostile towards Linux.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Back before AMD Radeon Open Source drivers became good, the best options were widely considered to be Intel for Open Source that worked, or Nvidia for performance with proprietary drivers. AMD was basically considered the worst option you could choose.

Personally I have always used AMD anyway since 2005 on Linux, but that’s because I’m a somewhat extreme political user, and I don’t like Nvidia for multiple reasons. My wife however uses Nvidia, because she was less stubborn, and AMD worked poorly when she tried it.

IMO AMD is the way superior choice on Linux today.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

CUDA is great.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t get why so many find it OK to tie their development to 1 vendor? I suspect CUDA will die off in favor of a more open and flexible option.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Wayland + Nvidia = 💥

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I can’t tell if you’re saying Wayland + Nvidia is da bomb, or Wayland + Nvidia will fuck your system up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

From my experience with Nvidia, it’s both.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Weirdly enough, I’ve never been happier with Linux since I discovered Wayland with Fedora. I’m one year on my Linux journey at this point, my desktop never felt so polished. It actually feels like a competitor to Windows and MacOS now (at least for me) and yes, I use NVIDIA under Wayland

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

But Linus said something funny ten years ago, that means it’s 100% true for everyone forever!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

And that said one guy is actually an alt account of someone who was banned a long time ago, so the guy is literally evading a ban, and yet Michael is doing jack shit about it. Guess it works on his end as it is “hurr durr interaction”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I have tried several times to find a convincing answer as to why systemd bad hur dur, but I could never find one that says precisely why. I’d love it if someone could ELI5 it for me.

permalink
report
reply
38 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

This is easily the most comprehensive and informative reply to the issue with systemd I’ve seen so far. Thank you for the response, I can see why their increasing dominance is alarming.

I’m certainly not at liberty to pass judgment on whether it deserves its current reputation, since I barely know enough to make it work to my needs. But I would be most interested to see how things play out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Imagine if SystemD incorporates some form of DRM to ensure “compatibility” and “authenticity”, like how Google is trying to control the Web and Android (if you have followed the recent news). And SystemD is based out of RedHat, which should be plenty alarming already

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Thank you, that was an excellent reply. I vaguely knew there were arguments over systems, but had no idea of the details.

What you say about their overly large power, though: if they make a bad choice, and enough people agree it’s a bad choice, can’t a new project just fork systemd and take it in a good direction?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

It’s systemd or bust because it’s so much better than any other init system.

Also, your post glosses over the biggest issues people have with systemd. The lead developer was a complete fucking asshole and rubbed people the wrong way. Imo, that’s where most of the hate stems. The guy was a tool and the initial backlash spiraled from there.

But I guess being a jerk and being a sea-changing dev go hand-in-hand. Eg stallman, Torvalds, etc

Also, my favorite thing about the gnu diehards complaining that systemd does too much and doesn’t follow the unix principals… Emacs enters the chat. It also enters the email, text editor, ide, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

What ive heard is the “linux philosophy” argument. Its just doing too many things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

this comment shows how the word of mouth actually distorted the argument

its not the linux philosophy but one sentence of the unix philosophy (linux is not unix)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_philosophy

Make each program do one thing well. To do a new job, build afresh rather than complicate old programs by adding new “features”

besides being over 40 years old at this point

fun fact the linux kernel would actually not really fit this since it is an monolithic kernel

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Ah sorry, unix not linux. I didnt think of that before, it seems so obvious that linux kernel isnt doing one thing well, it does everything ever, kind of well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

because it’s not 90’s shell script thus it’s bloat. What is your difficulty with understanding it? /s

permalink
report
parent
reply

I had that attitude for a while but as I got used to it yeah, it’s easily superior. I wouldn’t go back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Basically every tech publication. In Germany heise.de is the largest publication, usually with very interesting and balanced, but the comments are deliberately hidden away. They are a place where the worst of the internet lives apparently.

permalink
report
reply

linuxmemes

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:
Community rules
  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

Community stats

  • 7.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.2K

    Posts

  • 66K

    Comments