203 points

The fact that he’s free speaks volumes about our failure “justice” system.

permalink
report
reply
98 points

Free is one thing. Fuckin duder is campaigning. Like what the actual fuck…

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

He doesn’t deserve the title of Duder, and the title of Duder doesn’t deserve such a stain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

I would like to issue an apology to all Duders out there. I am sincerely sorry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Not only that…there’s a good chance he is going to WIN again. What the fuck is anything?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yes, and if he was locked up without due process, it would say something else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

They lock people up without due process awaiting trial all the time though right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Depends, there’s certainly a good argument to be made that the bail system is flawed, etc. But trump was arraigned and is out on bail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

They lock people up without due process awaiting trial all the time though right?

No. No they literally do not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

If he wasn’t wealthy and white he’d be behind bars right now awaiting trial.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He’s wealthy and orange though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*

Yes, rich people pay bail all the time. We shouldn’t we make a political prisoner because of that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Due process does not mean, “scott free until there’s a guilty verdict”, you utter numpty. These aren’t all civil charges.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

I suppose being rude makes you feel good, strong, and right.

I know he’s rich, but a 200k bail is not Scott free. People pay bail all the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

The wheels of justice grind very slowly. The bigger the case, the longer it takes to build.

But yes, I’m getting impatient. There should be consequences for trying to overthrow the government.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yes, fair. I want an air tight case, and that takes time. It’s frustrating. But a flimsy case would be worse. Putting him directly into jail would be worse and set a terrible precedent. People seem eager to fall head first into his narrative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

“Justice delayed is justice denied”, especially if it’s delayed long enough for the defendant to dismantle the justice system itself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

He should have been arrested on the spot and thrown into gitmo while the courts decide what to do with the body.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I just want him to get the same treatment I would get if I committed a serious crime in broad daylight.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sure, we’ll all be waiting for a verdict with baited breath.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Also about the failure of our national security apparatus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
113 points

It sounds like one or two guys booing…? Falling for news like this is how you grow complacent and not have the voter turnout that you expect.

permalink
report
reply
49 points
28 points
*

Yes, it’s all bullshit and it’s designed in these ways for their target audience. I actually posted another similar one further down on this thread as well.

It’s meant to cause division to drive outrage and profits, and everyone just gobbles it up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
*

Someone needs to get their hearing checked. The embedded video in the tweet clearly has many overlapping boos, both men and women.

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1728567448100569088/pu/vid/avc1/480x270/gMMdbNq-v4fYi52Q.mp4

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I heard a mix of boos, cheering, and random noise. So you could make a headline that says either and it would still be “technically” true. The best kind of truth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

You didn’t report anything that wasn’t already reported. The booing is definitely more prominent.

And saying it was just one or two guys is just dumb.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

Nah, it’s bait news. Getting booed at a football game is not the same as getting booed by a handful of people as you drive through an area near the stadium.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Voters are voters. Boos are boos. Especially to Trump.

And you still apparently need a schedule a checkup or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes one video of Trump being booed will stop thousands from voting for some reason

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Probably not, but it hasn’t really kicked into gear yet. There will be many more. It happened in 2016 did it not?

Also check this out https://www.counton2.com/news/south-carolina-news/donald-trump-draws-cheers-in-nikki-haleys-backyard-at-clemson-south-carolina-football-game/

The current state of news media is garbage. All of it. The intent is not disseminating information, it’s twisting and controlling it to fit a narrative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

Title is misleading. There are definitely boos, but the headline makes is seem like a majority were boos vs a mix of boos and cheering.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Video sounded like uproarious cheers mostly. It’s a southern crowd.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The video inside the stadium was mostly cheers the groups that posted up by the entrance to boo him as he drove in was more boos. It’s a Clemson South Carolina game. It would be absurd to think a majority of people booed him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Steven Cheung, a spokesman for Trump, told a Newsweek editor in an email to “step away from your computer on a Saturday night and come to an event sometime to experience the electric Trump effect.”

That troll is so far up his own ass it’s difficult to imagine how he still manages to be up Trump’s ass.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

Imagine being him and thinking, “Mm, yeah. I gotta be his promoter.”

Then again, a former Trump Org finance person broke down in tears last week, because he’s sad they got caught committing fraud, and it makes him stressed that there’s all these lawyers and investigators poking around. Some of these people are beyond help.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The kind of electricity you get by putting pennies on a 40 amp fuse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

A turducken of windbags maybe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

The ratio of boos:cheers for any candidate is not worth reporting on.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

The rise of fascism is so passeé! /s

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 388K

    Comments