30 points

Now do Jared Kushner.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

This Kremlin propaganda outlet only cares about Jared Kushner when they’re criticizing Israel.

48 Search Results for: Hunter Biden

39 Search Results for: Jared Kushner

It would be amazing that they’ve covered private citizen Hunter Biden more than they covered Trump Admin official Jared Kushner if I were a credulous enough sucker to actually believe they were a good-faith progressive publication.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points
*
16 points
*

Literally the first thing on that list:

In Russia, Vladimir Putin’s evil genius matters less than pressures from the ultrarich, US foreign policy, and the ravages of the neoliberal Yeltsin years.

[Okay, Putin might be bad, but the real villain is the US and the more liberal regimes that preceded him]

And you only have to get to the fifth article to find one that flat-out denies the fact of Russia’s interference in US elections.

This is what Kremlin propaganda aimed at the US left looks like, “sure Russia is bad, but the accusations against them are lies and it’s really NATO and the US that are responsible for everything bad that has ever happened involving Russia”

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Hunter Biden isn’t relevant to anything. He’s a nobody.

permalink
report
reply
-26 points

You don’t want your 1.4 million dollars back? I mean I care about tax evasion especially from the rich.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

You don’t want your 1.4 million dollars back?

He has since paid his back taxes, so this isn’t a valid argument.

"In the year after he disclosed a federal investigation into his “tax affairs” in late 2020, President Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, paid off a significant tax liability, even as a grand jury continued to gather evidence in a wide-ranging examination of his international business dealings, according to people familiar with the case.

Mr. Biden’s failure to pay all his taxes has been a focus of the ongoing Justice Department investigation. While wiping out his liability does not preclude criminal charges against him, the payment could make it harder for prosecutors to win a conviction or a long sentence for tax-related offenses, according to tax law experts, since juries and judges tend to be more sympathetic to defendants who have paid their bills."

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/16/us/politics/hunter-biden-tax-bill-investigation.html

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Then let the IRS do their job…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

This is Biden’s Justice Department bringing the indictments, it’s their function to do this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

That’s not even how taxes work dumbass.

Go yell at Willy Nelson.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

The rich evading taxes is theft. Unfortunately you’ll probably see where these pathetic evasions end up in November… a complete inability to respond to these ridiculous issues the Repubicans are attracting people with, it’s like 2016 all over again. Good luck with winning the online debate wars while you lose everything else. After WW2 all the citizens of Germany shared blame, so it will be for Americans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Hunter Biden, the president’s problematic son, has finally been indicted for his years of tax evasion. Only in an egregiously unequal society like ours do the children of the rich and powerful get away with corruption for as long as Hunter Biden has.

I guess my old coworker who made $35k a year and evaded their taxes for more than 30yrs was just lying.

Fuck off with this “OnLy ThE rIcH CaN eVaDe TaXeS.” Lots of people do it without getting audited. There’s plenty of reasons to be pissed off about the two tiers of justice, but this Hunter Biden angle is just ignorant and smacks of Republicans clutching their pearls as they try to build public momentum for their impeachment bullshit.

permalink
report
reply
-16 points

It’s going to be a major election issue for Republicans like it or not, do you give them that by pretending it’s not a thing?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

No. I choose not to engage, because that’s what they want. They don’t care about acting in good faith, and they aren’t interested in sussing out the facts or nuance.

ETA: I wasn’t directing the “fuck off” at you, OP, but at the author of the article.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

I choose not to engage, because that’s what they want.

They do want you to roll over and not have a response, having a simple reasoned reasoned response that’s actually describing what’s going on without the conspiracy is far better. It shows you understand more and aren’t angry or shy to address it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Holy shit, I bailed on Jacobin Mag when the Ukraine War started and they cried “Both sides!” on every other piece, but this is a new low.

permalink
report
reply
-7 points

Hope you hate it <3 I love sharing Jacobin cause they generate a lot of interaction and agitate people’s status quo notions. Marxist view of Russia is like that, mistaken for “both sides” analysis (which breaks American’s brains) cause they don’t understand the materialist view of anything. Blame lack of education and their shitty news media for that. Anyway enjoy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

“It’s a Marxist analysis of Russia!”

No, it’s just apologism for imperialism while claiming anti-imperialism. Imagine being this brainrotted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

That makes no sense ^. Anti-imperialism requires criticizing America’s global actions and you interpret that as pro-Russia. Simple as that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 449K

    Comments